Literature DB >> 24442841

When do patients with hand illness seek online health consultations and what do they ask?

Jan Paul Briet1, Michiel G Hageman, Robin Blok, David Ring.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several websites allow people to post health questions and get answers from doctors. Knowing more about what patients seek from these websites might help in-office educational efforts, but little is known about what occurs on these sites. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: This study addressed whether patients seeking advice online already have seen a physician, the type of questions asked, if they are dissatisfied with their doctor, the characteristics of the physicians who respond, and the content of their answers. This study documents the circumstances and content of questions asked about hand illness, the characteristics of the physician responders, and their responses.
METHODS: One hundred thirty-one hand surgery-related questions from an online health consultation website were reviewed retrospectively. The timing of and reason for the consultation, the content of the questions, the specialty of physician responder, and the content of the responses were recorded.
RESULTS: Sixty patients (46%) were seeking information before seeing a doctor, 21 (16%) after a medical encounter, and 19 (15%) after hand surgery. With increasing contact with providers, patient queries transitioned from diagnosis, to treatment, to prognosis, and potential complications. Patients who had seen a doctor often expressed dissatisfaction (16 of 37 patients [43%]) as did those who had hand surgery (seven of 26 patients [27%]). Between one and eight doctors (average, two) answered each query. Most of the answering physicians were hand surgeons. The information they provided predominantly addressed diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Online consultations are most common among patients who have not seen a doctor, but also reflect uncertainty and dissatisfaction after seeing a doctor. Although online health consultations might support patients' quest for information and understanding, and the potential for multiple answers from different doctors creates the possibility for increased balance and breadth of opinions, the quality of the information and cost-effectiveness of this approach are uncertain and need to be evaluated carefully in future studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24442841      PMCID: PMC3940746          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3461-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  22 in total

1.  Predictors of patient satisfaction.

Authors:  J L Jackson; J Chamberlin; K Kroenke
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Medical online consultation service regarding maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Christiane Brockes; Jan Samuel Schenkel; Rachel Neuhaus Buehler; Klaus Grätz; Sabine Schmidt-Weitmann
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  The 'Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale' (MISS-21) adapted for British general practice.

Authors:  Richard Meakin; John Weinman
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.267

4.  Medical telephone triage and patient behaviour: How do they compare?

Authors:  Steffan Niemann; Andreas Meer; Christian Simonin; Thomas Abel
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 2.193

5.  Catastrophizing is associated with pain intensity, psychological distress, and pain-related disability among individuals with chronic pain after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Judith A Turner; Mark P Jensen; Catherine A Warms; Diana D Cardenas
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey.

Authors:  Laurence Baker; Todd H Wagner; Sara Singer; M Kate Bundorf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Between strangers: the practice of medicine online.

Authors:  Tracy E Miller; Arthur R Derse
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  An eight-year study of internet-based remote medical counselling.

Authors:  G Labiris; I Coertzen; A Katsikas; A Karydis; A Petounis
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.184

9.  What are patients seeking when they turn to the Internet? Qualitative content analysis of questions asked by visitors to an orthopaedics Web site.

Authors:  Kristen S Shuyler; Kristin M Knight
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2003-10-10       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Reasons for consulting a doctor on the Internet: Web survey of users of an Ask the Doctor service.

Authors:  Göran Umefjord; Göran Petersson; Katarina Hamberg
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Web Use for Symptom Appraisal of Physical Health Conditions: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Julia Mueller; Caroline Jay; Simon Harper; Alan Davies; Julio Vega; Chris Todd
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Impact of Scientific Versus Emotional Wording of Patient Questions on Doctor-Patient Communication in an Internet Forum: A Randomized Controlled Experiment with Medical Students.

Authors:  Martina Bientzle; Jan Griewatz; Joachim Kimmerle; Julia Küppers; Ulrike Cress; Maria Lammerding-Koeppel
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  A "Third Wheel" Effect in Health Decision Making Involving Artificial Entities: A Psychological Perspective.

Authors:  Stefano Triberti; Ilaria Durosini; Gabriella Pravettoni
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-04-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.