Literature DB >> 24442792

Non-destructive evaluation of chlorophyll content in quinoa and amaranth leaves by simple and multiple regression analysis of RGB image components.

M Riccardi1, G Mele, C Pulvento, A Lavini, R d'Andria, S-E Jacobsen.   

Abstract

Leaf chlorophyll content provides valuable information about physiological status of plants; it is directly linked to photosynthetic potential and primary production. In vitro assessment by wet chemical extraction is the standard method for leaf chlorophyll determination. This measurement is expensive, laborious, and time consuming. Over the years alternative methods, rapid and non-destructive, have been explored. The aim of this work was to evaluate the applicability of a fast and non-invasive field method for estimation of chlorophyll content in quinoa and amaranth leaves based on RGB components analysis of digital images acquired with a standard SLR camera. Digital images of leaves from different genotypes of quinoa and amaranth were acquired directly in the field. Mean values of each RGB component were evaluated via image analysis software and correlated to leaf chlorophyll provided by standard laboratory procedure. Single and multiple regression models using RGB color components as independent variables have been tested and validated. The performance of the proposed method was compared to that of the widely used non-destructive SPAD method. Sensitivity of the best regression models for different genotypes of quinoa and amaranth was also checked. Color data acquisition of the leaves in the field with a digital camera was quick, more effective, and lower cost than SPAD. The proposed RGB models provided better correlation (highest R (2)) and prediction (lowest RMSEP) of the true value of foliar chlorophyll content and had a lower amount of noise in the whole range of chlorophyll studied compared with SPAD and other leaf image processing based models when applied to quinoa and amaranth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24442792     DOI: 10.1007/s11120-014-9970-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photosynth Res        ISSN: 0166-8595            Impact factor:   3.573


  7 in total

1.  Inherent limitations of nondestructive chlorophyll meters: a comparison of two types of meters.

Authors:  O A Monje; B Bugbee
Journal:  HortScience       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.455

2.  Evaluating the relationship between leaf chlorophyll concentration and SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter readings.

Authors:  J Uddling; J Gelang-Alfredsson; K Piikki; H Pleijel
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Simultaneous estimation of chlorophyll a and lipid contents in microalgae by three-color analysis.

Authors:  Chia-Hung Su; Chun-Chong Fu; Yet-Chung Chang; Giridhar R Nair; Jun-Liang Ye; I-Ming Chu; Wen-Teng Wu
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Genetic analysis of cold-tolerance of photosynthesis in maize.

Authors:  Y Fracheboud; C Jompuk; J M Ribaut; P Stamp; J Leipner
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.076

5.  Effect of High Temperature on Photosynthesis in Beans (II. CO2 Assimilation and Metabolite Contents).

Authors:  C. Pastenes; P. Horton
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Exploring the relationship between reflectance red edge and chlorophyll content in slash pine.

Authors:  Paul J. Curran; Jennifer L. Dungan; Henry L. Gholz
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.196

7.  Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter.

Authors:  J Markwell; J C Osterman; J L Mitchell
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.573

  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  Comparative Metabolomics study of flavonoids in the pericarp of different coloured bitter gourds (Momordica charantia L.).

Authors:  Hongmei Zhang; Xuan Du; Jizhu Yu; Haijun Jin; Na Liu
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2022-07-29

2.  A nondestructive method to estimate the chlorophyll content of Arabidopsis seedlings.

Authors:  Ying Liang; Daisuke Urano; Kang-Ling Liao; Tyson L Hedrick; Yajun Gao; Alan M Jones
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 4.993

3.  PlantSize Offers an Affordable, Non-destructive Method to Measure Plant Size and Color in Vitro.

Authors:  Dóra Faragó; László Sass; Ildikó Valkai; Norbert Andrási; László Szabados
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Land-based crop phenotyping by image analysis: consistent canopy characterization from inconsistent field illumination.

Authors:  Joshua Chopin; Pankaj Kumar; Stanley J Miklavcic
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 4.993

5.  Overcoming Physiological Bottlenecks of Leaf Vitality and Root Development in Cuttings: A Systemic Perspective.

Authors:  Uwe Druege
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  How Does Mechanical Pearling Affect Quinoa Nutrients and Saponin Contents?

Authors:  Sifeddine Rafik; Mohamed Rahmani; Juan Pablo Rodriguez; Said Andam; Amine Ezzariai; Mohamed El Gharous; Salwa Karboune; Redouane Choukr-Allah; Abdelaziz Hirich
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-03

7.  Seasonal variations of leaf and canopy properties tracked by ground-based NDVI imagery in a temperate forest.

Authors:  Hualei Yang; Xi Yang; Mary Heskel; Shucun Sun; Jianwu Tang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.996

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.