Literature DB >> 24442595

Looking for age-related growth decline in natural forests: unexpected biomass patterns from tree rings and simulated mortality.

Jane R Foster1, Anthony W D'Amato, John B Bradford.   

Abstract

Forest biomass growth is almost universally assumed to peak early in stand development, near canopy closure, after which it will plateau or decline. The chronosequence and plot remeasurement approaches used to establish the decline pattern suffer from limitations and coarse temporal detail. We combined annual tree ring measurements and mortality models to address two questions: first, how do assumptions about tree growth and mortality influence reconstructions of biomass growth? Second, under what circumstances does biomass production follow the model that peaks early, then declines? We integrated three stochastic mortality models with a census tree-ring data set from eight temperate forest types to reconstruct stand-level biomass increments (in Minnesota, USA). We compared growth patterns among mortality models, forest types and stands. Timing of peak biomass growth varied significantly among mortality models, peaking 20-30 years earlier when mortality was random with respect to tree growth and size, than when mortality favored slow-growing individuals. Random or u-shaped mortality (highest in small or large trees) produced peak growth 25-30% higher than the surviving tree sample alone. Growth trends for even-aged, monospecific Pinus banksiana or Acer saccharum forests were similar to the early peak and decline expectation. However, we observed continually increasing biomass growth in older, low-productivity forests of Quercus rubra, Fraxinus nigra, and Thuja occidentalis. Tree-ring reconstructions estimated annual changes in live biomass growth and identified more diverse development patterns than previous methods. These detailed, long-term patterns of biomass development are crucial for detecting recent growth responses to global change and modeling future forest dynamics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24442595     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-014-2881-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  17 in total

1.  Evidence for a recent increase in forest growth is questionable.

Authors:  Jane R Foster; Julia I Burton; Jodi A Forrester; Feng Liu; Jordan D Muss; Francesco M Sabatini; Robert M Scheller; David J Mladenoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Forest responses to increasing aridity and warmth in the southwestern United States.

Authors:  A Park Williams; Craig D Allen; Constance I Millar; Thomas W Swetnam; Joel Michaelsen; Christopher J Still; Steven W Leavitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Testing the assumptions of chronosequences in succession.

Authors:  Edward A Johnson; Kiyoko Miyanishi
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Aboveground net primary production decline with stand age: potential causes.

Authors:  S T Gower; R E McMurtrie; D Murty
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  The strategy of ecosystem development.

Authors:  E P Odum
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-04-18       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Contributions of land-use history to carbon accumulation in U.S. forests.

Authors:  J P Caspersen; S W Pacala; J C Jenkins; G C Hurtt; P R Moorcroft; R A Birdsey
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-11-10       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Trends in bole biomass accumulation, net primary production and tree mortality in Pseudotsuga menziesii forests of contrasting age.

Authors:  S A Acker; C B Halpern; M E Harmon; C T Dyrness
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.196

8.  Historical forest baselines reveal potential for continued carbon sequestration.

Authors:  Jeanine M Rhemtulla; David J Mladenoff; Murray K Clayton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Size-specific tree mortality varies with neighbourhood crowding and disturbance in a Montane Nothofagus forest.

Authors:  Jennifer M Hurst; Robert B Allen; David A Coomes; Richard P Duncan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Quantifying variation in forest disturbance, and its effects on aboveground biomass dynamics, across the eastern United States.

Authors:  Mark C Vanderwel; David A Coomes; Drew W Purves
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 10.863

View more
  6 in total

1.  Climatic Stress during Stand Development Alters the Sign and Magnitude of Age-Related Growth Responses in a Subtropical Mountain Pine.

Authors:  Paloma Ruiz-Benito; Jaime Madrigal-González; Sarah Young; Pierre Mercatoris; Liam Cavin; Tsurng-Juhn Huang; Jan-Chang Chen; Alistair S Jump
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Future forest aboveground carbon dynamics in the central United States: the importance of forest demographic processes.

Authors:  Wenchi Jin; Hong S He; Frank R Thompson; Wen J Wang; Jacob S Fraser; Stephen R Shifley; Brice B Hanberry; William D Dijak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Tree demography dominates long-term growth trends inferred from tree rings.

Authors:  Roel J W Brienen; Manuel Gloor; Guy Ziv
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 10.863

4.  Aboveground biomass increments over 26 years (1993-2019) in an old-growth cool-temperate forest in northern Japan.

Authors:  Mahoko Noguchi; Kazuhiko Hoshizaki; Michinari Matsushita; Daiki Sugiura; Tsutomu Yagihashi; Tomoyuki Saitoh; Tomohiro Itabashi; Ohta Kazuhide; Mitsue Shibata; Daisuke Hoshino; Takashi Masaki; Katsuhiro Osumi; Kazunori Takahashi; Wajirou Suzuki
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.629

5.  Multilevel analysis of dendroclimatic series with the R-package BIOdry.

Authors:  Wilson Lara; Stella Bogino; Felipe Bravo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Forest disturbances and climate constrain carbon allocation dynamics in trees.

Authors:  Guillermo Gea-Izquierdo; Mariola Sánchez-González
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 13.211

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.