Literature DB >> 24442554

Effects of a hinged expansion screw for median mandibular distraction treatment on the lower first molars regarding tooth inclination and intermolar transverse distance.

Alfred Peter Muchitsch1, Heinz Winsauer, Brigitte Wendl, Margit Pichelmayer, Elma Kuljuh, Marie Therese Navysany, Markus Muchitsch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to assess the extent to which median mandibular distraction via a cemented and screw-retained full-coverage splint appliance employing a hinged expansion screw causes inclination changes in the lower first molars and widens the dental arch.
METHODS: Our study included 17 patients (12 females and 5 males; average age 16 years and 3 months) who presented with transverse space deficits and pronounced dental crowding. Baseline and final mandibular casts reflecting the situations before and after 6 weeks of median distraction therapy were created, scanned, and matched via their coordinate systems. Perpendiculars were drawn at the geometric centers between the cusp tips of teeth 36 and 46 and projected against the frontal plane. The intersection angles yielded single-tooth and total inclination values for both molars, and the difference between the intermolar distances measured at the geometric centers of both teeth provided the amount of transverse expansion.
RESULTS: An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of >0.99 was obtained in a series of three measurements. After distraction treatment, the total inclination values between teeth 36 and 46 changed by +2.93 ± 9.14°. The corresponding single-tooth inclinations changed by +0.68 ± 6.32° and -2.25 ± 4.33°, respectively. Both molars underwent similar degrees of buccal or lingual tipping. Compared to a mean expansion of +6.9 ± 1.83 mm at the distraction screw, a distance increase of only +3.77 ± 1.27 mm along the transversal connecting teeth 36 and 46 was recorded. Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.336 between total tipping and intermolar expansion (p=0.187) and -0.426 between total tipping and patient age (p=0.088).
CONCLUSION: Expansion amounts were approximately twice as long at the expansion screw as between the first molars. This V-shaped expansion pattern was due to the hinged connections between each expansion screw and the full-coverage splints. The buccal and lingual tipping of molars measured may be due to varying heights of the posterior alveolar ridge during mixed dentition or to anatomy-related differences in the expansion-screw position. In all cases we observed a mainly parallel opening of the distraction gap on the vertical plane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24442554     DOI: 10.1007/s00056-013-0191-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  19 in total

1.  Tooth-borne distraction to widen the mandible. Technical note.

Authors:  B Niederhagen; B Braumann; S Bergé; J J von Lindern; T Appel
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Long-term skeletal and dental effects of mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  M Del Santo; C A Guerrero; P H Buschang; J D English; M L Samchukov; W H Bell
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Condylar displacement related to mandibular symphyseal distraction.

Authors:  Stanley Braun; J Alexandre Bottrel; Harry L Legan
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 4.  Enamel reduction procedures in orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  P Emile Rossouw; Andrew Tortorella
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  Intraoral widening and lengthening of the mandible in baboons by distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  W H Bell; M Gonzalez; M L Samchukov; C A Guerrero
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis: review of three techniques.

Authors:  A Alkan; M Ozer; B Baş; M Bayram; N Celebi; S Inal; B Ozden
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  Dental stability and radiographic healing patterns after mandibular symphysis widening with distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Young-Wook Chung; Ki-Chul Tae
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Mandibular widening by intraoral distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  C A Guerrero; W H Bell; G I Contasti; A M Rodriguez
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.651

9.  Effects of transmandibular symphyseal distraction on teeth, bone, and temporomandibular joint.

Authors:  Tayfun Gunbay; M Cemal Akay; Aynur Aras; Murat Gomel
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Various anchorage approaches in unilateral mandibular molar distalization using a fixed lingual arch appliance.

Authors:  Gero Kinzinger; Ulrike Fritz; Peter Diedrich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.938

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.