Literature DB >> 24441672

The UK Lung Screen (UKLS): demographic profile of first 88,897 approaches provides recommendations for population screening.

Fiona E McRonald1, Ghasem Yadegarfar, David R Baldwin, Anand Devaraj, Kate E Brain, Tim Eisen, John A Holemans, Martin Ledson, Nicholas Screaton, Robert C Rintoul, Christopher J Hands, Kate Lifford, David Whynes, Keith M Kerr, Richard Page, Mahesh Parmar, Nicholas Wald, David Weller, Paula R Williamson, Jonathan Myles, David M Hansell, Stephen W Duffy, John K Field.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The UK Lung Cancer Screening trial (UKLS) aims to evaluate low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer population screening in the United Kingdom. In UKLS, a large population sample ages 50 to 75 years is approached with a questionnaire to determine lung cancer risk. Those with an estimated risk of at least 5% of developing lung cancer in the next 5 years (using the Liverpool Lung project risk model) are invited to participate in the trial. Here, we present demographic, risk, and response rate data from the first 88,897 individuals approached. Of note, 23,794 individuals (26.8% of all approached) responded positively to the initial questionnaire; 12% of these were high risk. Higher socioeconomic status correlated positively with response, but inversely with risk (P < 0.001). The 50- to 55-year age group was least likely to participate, and at lowest cancer risk. Only 5% of clinic attendees were ages ≤60 years (compared with 47% of all 88,897 approached); this has implications for cost effectiveness. Among positive responders, there were more ex-smokers than expected from population figures (40% vs. 33%), and fewer current smokers (14% vs. 17.5%). Of note, 32.7% of current smokers and 18.4% of ex-smokers were designated as high risk. Overall, 1,452 of 23,794 positive responders (6.1%) were deemed high risk and attended a recruitment clinic. UKLS is the first LDCT population screening trial, selecting high-risk subjects using a validated individual risk prediction model. KEY
FINDINGS: (i) better recruitment from ex- rather than current smokers, (ii) few clinic attendees ages early 50s, and (iii) representative number of socioeconomically deprived people recruited, despite lower response rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24441672     DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)        ISSN: 1940-6215


  41 in total

Review 1.  Next steps and barriers to implementing lung cancer screening with low-dose CT.

Authors:  D R Baldwin; E L O'Dowd
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Lung cancer screening-low dose CT for lung cancer screening: recent trial results and next steps.

Authors:  Emma Louise O'Dowd; David R Baldwin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  The narrow path to organized LDCT lung cancer screening programs in Europe.

Authors:  Eugenio Paci
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Biomarkers of risk to develop lung cancer in the new screening era.

Authors:  Thomas Atwater; Pierre P Massion
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

5.  An official American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians policy statement: implementation of low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening programs in clinical practice.

Authors:  Renda Soylemez Wiener; Michael K Gould; Douglas A Arenberg; David H Au; Kathleen Fennig; Carla R Lamb; Peter J Mazzone; David E Midthun; Maryann Napoli; David E Ost; Charles A Powell; M Patricia Rivera; Christopher G Slatore; Nichole T Tanner; Anil Vachani; Juan P Wisnivesky; Sue H Yoon
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 6.  Lung cancer screening: identifying the high risk cohort.

Authors:  Michael W Marcus; Olaide Y Raji; John K Field
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Implementing lung cancer screening in the real world: opportunity, challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Robert J Optican; Caroline Chiles
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

Review 8.  Risk factors assessment and risk prediction models in lung cancer screening candidates.

Authors:  Mariusz Adamek; Ewa Wachuła; Sylwia Szabłowska-Siwik; Agnieszka Boratyn-Nowicka; Damian Czyżewski
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

9.  Should Never-Smokers at Increased Risk for Lung Cancer Be Screened?

Authors:  Kevin Ten Haaf; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 10.  [Lung cancer screening - risk stratification : Who should undergo screening?].

Authors:  L Beer; H Prosch
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.