BACKGROUND: Prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) is serious complication of valvular replacement surgery, and increased levels of anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) are associated with thrombosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of aCL in the development of PVT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied the aCL IgM and IgG levels in 114 patients with PVT and 80 healthy patients with prosthetic valves without PVT or a history of thrombosis. All patients underwent detailed transthoracic, transesophageal echocardiographic and clinical examinations. Blood samples were obtained after transesophageal echocardiography. Tests were repeated 12 weeks apart in patients with aCL IgM or IgG positivity. RESULTS: The mean age, sex, presence of atrial fibrillation and cardiovascular risk factors, elapsed time after surgery, and prosthetic valve type and location were similar between patients with PVT and those without. Ineffective anticoagulation was significantly higher among patients with PVT (p < 0.001). The aCL IgM values were significantly higher and positive (> 40 MPL) in the PVT group compared with the control group (10.58 ± 15.90 MPL to 3.70 ± 2.30 MPL, p < 0.001; 7.0 to 0 %, p = 0.016, respectively). The aCL IgG values were significantly higher and positive (> 40 GPL) in the PVT group compared with the control group (12.04 ± 17.58 GPL to 3.83 ± 2.56 GPL, p < 0.001 and 7.9 to 0 %, p = 0.01, respectively). According to international consensus documents, 16 patients had antiphospholipid syndrome. Ineffective anticoagulation and aCL IgM and IgG positivity were independent predictors of PVT in logistic regression analysis (multivariate r(2)= 0.648; p < 0.001, OR= 21.405, 95 %CI= 8.201-55.872; p = 0.008, OR= 1.322, % 95CI= 1.076-1.626; p = 0.005, OR= 1.288, 95 %CI= 1.079-1.538). CONCLUSION: Since the presence of aCL IgM and IgG positivity may cause a tendency toward PVT, these values should be examined in all patients with PVT.
BACKGROUND: Prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) is serious complication of valvular replacement surgery, and increased levels of anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) are associated with thrombosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of aCL in the development of PVT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied the aCL IgM and IgG levels in 114 patients with PVT and 80 healthy patients with prosthetic valves without PVT or a history of thrombosis. All patients underwent detailed transthoracic, transesophageal echocardiographic and clinical examinations. Blood samples were obtained after transesophageal echocardiography. Tests were repeated 12 weeks apart in patients with aCL IgM or IgG positivity. RESULTS: The mean age, sex, presence of atrial fibrillation and cardiovascular risk factors, elapsed time after surgery, and prosthetic valve type and location were similar between patients with PVT and those without. Ineffective anticoagulation was significantly higher among patients with PVT (p < 0.001). The aCL IgM values were significantly higher and positive (> 40 MPL) in the PVT group compared with the control group (10.58 ± 15.90 MPL to 3.70 ± 2.30 MPL, p < 0.001; 7.0 to 0 %, p = 0.016, respectively). The aCL IgG values were significantly higher and positive (> 40 GPL) in the PVT group compared with the control group (12.04 ± 17.58 GPL to 3.83 ± 2.56 GPL, p < 0.001 and 7.9 to 0 %, p = 0.01, respectively). According to international consensus documents, 16 patients had antiphospholipid syndrome. Ineffective anticoagulation and aCL IgM and IgG positivity were independent predictors of PVT in logistic regression analysis (multivariate r(2)= 0.648; p < 0.001, OR= 21.405, 95 %CI= 8.201-55.872; p = 0.008, OR= 1.322, % 95CI= 1.076-1.626; p = 0.005, OR= 1.288, 95 %CI= 1.079-1.538). CONCLUSION: Since the presence of aCL IgM and IgG positivity may cause a tendency toward PVT, these values should be examined in all patients with PVT.
Authors: A Tincani; F Allegri; M Sanmarco; M Cinquini; M Taglietti; G Balestrieri; T Koike; K Ichikawa; P Meroni; M C Boffa Journal: Thromb Haemost Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: M Galli; P Comfurius; C Maassen; H C Hemker; M H de Baets; P J van Breda-Vriesman; T Barbui; R F Zwaal; E M Bevers Journal: Lancet Date: 1990-06-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Mehmet Özkan; Sabahattin Gündüz; Murat Biteker; Mehmet Ali Astarcioglu; Cihan Çevik; Evren Kaynak; Mustafa Yıldız; Emrah Oğuz; Ahmet Çağrı Aykan; Emre Ertürk; Yusuf Karavelioğlu; Tayyar Gökdeniz; Hasan Kaya; Ozan Mustafa Gürsoy; Beytullah Çakal; Süleyman Karakoyun; Nilüfer Duran; Nihal Özdemir Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-02
Authors: Clive Kearon; Jeffrey S Ginsberg; Michael J Kovacs; David R Anderson; Philip Wells; Jim A Julian; Betsy MacKinnon; Jeffrey I Weitz; Mark A Crowther; Sean Dolan; Alexander G Turpie; William Geerts; Susan Solymoss; Paul van Nguyen; Christine Demers; Susan R Kahn; Jeannine Kassis; Marc Rodger; Julie Hambleton; Michael Gent Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-08-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Steven R Levine; Robin L Brey; Barbara C Tilley; J L P Thompson; Ralph L Sacco; Robert R Sciacca; A Murphy; Yimeng Lu; Teresa M Costigan; Candi Rhine; Bruce Levin; Douglas A Triplett; J P Mohr Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-02-04 Impact factor: 56.272