Literature DB >> 24440984

Comparison of delayed matching-to-sample performance in monkeys and children.

John J Chelonis1, Andrew R Cox2, Michael J Karr3, Patricia K Prunty4, Ronald L Baldwin2, Merle G Paule5.   

Abstract

Although research has consistently demonstrated that accuracy on a variety of memory tasks decreases as delay increases, relatively little research has been conducted to quantify this relationship across development in humans or directly compare rates of forgetting between humans and monkeys. This study utilized a delayed matching-to-sample (DMTS) task to compare the relative contributions of proactive interference and attention on the rate of forgetting in monkeys and children. The performance of 1125 children from four to fourteen years of age and 10 adult rhesus monkeys was compared. For this DMTS task, a shape was displayed on the center one of three press-plates. After a delay, the subjects were required to match the original shape with one of three choice shapes to receive a banana-flavored food pellet for monkeys, or a nickel for children. A modified power function provided an excellent fit for the data for monkeys and children. The forgetting rates in children decreased with age, and the forgetting rates for monkeys were most comparable to those of younger children. The data also suggest that proactive interference did not significantly contribute to the forgetting rates for monkeys or younger children. Further, the monkeys appeared to attend to the task at a level similar to that of younger children as evidenced by the similarities in response latencies. The results from this study indicate that the rate of forgetting in monkeys, as well as the mechanisms underlying this rate, appears to share more similarities with that of younger children than of older children. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Children; Delayed matching-to-sample; Forgetting; Monkeys; Proactive interference

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24440984     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  5 in total

1.  Remifentanil maintains lower initial delayed nonmatching-to-sample accuracy compared to food pellets in male rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Blake A Hutsell; Matthew L Banks
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Neurodevelopment of children exposed to anesthesia: design of the Mayo Anesthesia Safety in Kids (MASK) study.

Authors:  Stephen J Gleich; Randall Flick; Danqing Hu; Michael J Zaccariello; Robert C Colligan; Slavica K Katusic; Darrell R Schroeder; Andrew Hanson; Shonie Buenvenida; Robert T Wilder; Juraj Sprung; Robert G Voigt; Merle G Paule; John J Chelonis; David O Warner
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Sexually dimorphic associations between prenatal blood lead exposure and performance on a behavioral testing battery in children.

Authors:  Francheska M Merced-Nieves; John Chelonis; Ivan Pantic; Lourdes Schnass; Martha M Téllez-Rojo; Joseph M Braun; Merle G Paule; Rosalind J Wright; Robert O Wright; Paul Curtin
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.763

Review 4.  Towards a comparative science of emotion: Affect and consciousness in humans and animals.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Paul; Shlomi Sher; Marco Tamietto; Piotr Winkielman; Michael T Mendl
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Dimension of visual information interacts with working memory in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Daniel J Fehring; Alexander J Pascoe; Zakia Z Haque; Ranshikha Samandra; Seiichirou Yokoo; Hiroshi Abe; Marcello G P Rosa; Keiji Tanaka; Tetsuo Yamamori; Farshad A Mansouri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.