Literature DB >> 24440937

Comparison of lamivudine plus adefovir therapy versus entecavir with or without adefovir therapy for adefovir-resistant chronic hepatitis B.

Seong Hee Kang1, Hyung Joon Yim, Hae Rim Kim, Keunhee Kang, Sang Jun Suh, Hyun Jung Lee, Eileen L Yoon, Ji Hoon Kim, Yeon Seok Seo, Jong Eun Yeon, Kwan Soo Byun.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND GOALS: Data regarding the management of adefovir (ADV) resistance are still limited. The aim of this study is to investigate treatment outcomes of rescue therapy in ADV-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. STUDY: CHB patients who began rescue therapy due to documented genotypic resistance mutations to ADV between October 2006 and July 2012 were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were included in this study. Most patients had history of lamivudine (LAM) resistance. Treatment response was evaluated at 3-month intervals up to 12 months. The cumulative rate of complete virologic response (CVR) in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients (HBV DNA<60 IU/mL) was 15.9%, 27.2%, 28.9%, and 31.7% after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of rescue therapy. Thirty-five patients were treated with a combination of LAM plus ADV (LAM+ADV group) and 28 patients were treated with entecavir (ETV)-based therapy (ETV with or without ADV therapy, ETV±ADV group). The cumulative CVR rate was significantly higher in the ETV±ADV group than in the LAM+ADV group at month 12 (46.4% vs. 20.6%, respectively, P=0.040). Multivariate analysis showed that pretreatment serum HBV DNA levels at <6 log10 IU/mL (hazard ratio: 34.109, P=0.001) and type of rescue therapy (hazard ratio: 4.944, P=0.036) were associated with CVR.
CONCLUSIONS: Lower baseline HBV DNA level and ETV±ADV therapy were the important predictive factors for CVR in ADV-resistant CHB patients. This study suggests the need of early switching to a rescue therapy such as ETV±ADV at the time of low-level viremia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24440937     DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  5 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness Comparison Between the Response-Guided Therapies and Monotherapies of Nucleos(t)ide Analogues for Chronic Hepatitis B Patients in China.

Authors:  Keng Lai; Chi Zhang; Weixia Ke; Yanhui Gao; Shudong Zhou; Li Liu; Yi Yang
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  A different inhibitor is required for overcoming entecavir resistance: a comparison of four rescue therapies in a retrospective study.

Authors:  Guosheng Yuan; Chengguang Hu; Yuchen Zhou; Junwei Liu; Huaping Huang; Yuan Li; Dinghua Yang; Fuyuan Zhou; Yong-Yuan Zhang; Yuanping Zhou
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-06-18       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of lamivudine, telbivudine, and entecavir in treatment of chronic hepatitis B with adefovir dipivoxil resistance.

Authors:  Guiliang Wang; Yan Liu; Ping Qiu; Shu-Feng Zhou; Linfang Xu; Ping Wen; Jianbo Wen; Xianzhong Xiao
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 4.162

4.  Delayed Reduction of Hepatitis B Viral Load and Dynamics of Adefovir-Resistant Variants during Adefovir plus Entecavir Combination Rescue Therapy.

Authors:  Yang Wang; Shuang Liu; Yu Chen; Sujun Zheng; Li Zhou; Fengmin Lu; Zhongping Duan
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Lamivudine-resistant rtL180M and rtM204I/V are persistently dominant during combination rescue therapy with entecavir and adefovir for hepatitis B.

Authors:  Yang Wang; Shuang Liu; Y U Chen; Sujun Zheng; L I Zhou; Fengmin Lu; Zhongping Duan
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 2.447

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.