Michael D Zwank1, Benjamin M Ho2, David Gresback3, Logan H Stuck4, Joshua G Salzman5, Wendy R Woster6. 1. Emergency Medicine Department, Regions Hospital, Saint Paul, MN, USA; University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Electronic address: michael.d.zwank@healthpartners.com. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA. 4. HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Bloomington, MN, USA. 5. Critical Care Research Center, Regions Hospital, Saint Paul, MN, USA. 6. Emergency Medicine Department, Regions Hospital, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with renal colic commonly present to the emergency department (ED) and are usually treated with analgesics, antiemetics and hydration. Computed tomographic (CT) scan is commonly utilized in evaluating patients with suspected renal colic. OBJECTIVES: We compared diagnosis and treatment plans before and after CT in patients with suspected renal colic with the aim to evaluate how often changes in diagnosis, treatment and disposition are made. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we enrolled a convenience sample of clinically Stable ED patients older than 17 with suspected renal colic for whom CT was planned. Exclusion criteria were: chronic kidney disease, urinary tract infection, recent CT and history of previous kidney stone. Pre-CT and Post-CT surveys were completed by the treating provider. RESULTS: The discharge diagnosis was renal colic in 62 of 93 enrolled patients (67%). Urinalysis showed blood in 52 of these patients (84%). CT confirmed obstructing kidney or bladder stone in 50 patients. There were five cases of alternative diagnoses noted on CT scan. After CT scan, 7 patients had changes in disposition. Sixteen providers felt that CT would not change management. In these cases, CT offered no alternative diagnosis and didn't change disposition. CONCLUSION: CT scan didn't change management when providers did not expect it would. This indicates that providers who are confident with the diagnosis of renal colic should consider forgoing a CT scan. CT scan did occasionally find important alternative diagnoses and should be utilized when providers are considering other concerning pathology.
BACKGROUND:Patients with renal colic commonly present to the emergency department (ED) and are usually treated with analgesics, antiemetics and hydration. Computed tomographic (CT) scan is commonly utilized in evaluating patients with suspected renal colic. OBJECTIVES: We compared diagnosis and treatment plans before and after CT in patients with suspected renal colic with the aim to evaluate how often changes in diagnosis, treatment and disposition are made. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we enrolled a convenience sample of clinically Stable ED patients older than 17 with suspected renal colic for whom CT was planned. Exclusion criteria were: chronic kidney disease, urinary tract infection, recent CT and history of previous kidney stone. Pre-CT and Post-CT surveys were completed by the treating provider. RESULTS: The discharge diagnosis was renal colic in 62 of 93 enrolled patients (67%). Urinalysis showed blood in 52 of these patients (84%). CT confirmed obstructing kidney or bladder stone in 50 patients. There were five cases of alternative diagnoses noted on CT scan. After CT scan, 7 patients had changes in disposition. Sixteen providers felt that CT would not change management. In these cases, CT offered no alternative diagnosis and didn't change disposition. CONCLUSION: CT scan didn't change management when providers did not expect it would. This indicates that providers who are confident with the diagnosis of renal colic should consider forgoing a CT scan. CT scan did occasionally find important alternative diagnoses and should be utilized when providers are considering other concerning pathology.
Authors: Carlos Nicolau; Michel Claudon; Lorenzo E Derchi; E Jane Adam; Michael Bachmann Nielsen; Gerhard Mostbeck; Catherine M Owens; Christiane Nyhsen; Spyros Yarmenitis Journal: Insights Imaging Date: 2015-05-21