Mike T John1, Daniel R Reißmann2, Leah Feuerstahler3, Niels Waller3, Kazuyoshi Baba4, Pernilla Larsson5, Asja Čelebić6, Gyula Szabo7, Ksenija Rener-Sitar8. 1. Department of Diagnostic and Biological Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA. Electronic address: mtjohn@umn.edu. 2. Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA. 4. Department of Prosthodontics, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan. 5. Centre of Oral Rehabilitation, Prosthetic Dentistry, Norrköping, Sweden. 6. Department of Prosthodontics, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia. 7. Department of Prosthodontics, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary. 8. Department of Prosthodontics, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A desideratum of oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) instruments - such as the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) - is that they accurately reflect the structure of the measured construct(s). With this goal in mind, the Dimensions of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (DOQ) Project was proposed to investigate the number and nature of OHRQoL dimensions measured by OHIP. In this report, we describe our aggregate data set for the factor analyses in the project, which consists of responses to the 49-item OHIP from general population subjects and prosthodontics patients from 6 countries, including a large age range of adult subjects and both genders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The DOQ Project's aggregate data set combines data from 35 individual studies conducted in Croatia, Germany, Hungary, Japan, Slovenia, and Sweden. RESULTS: The combined data set includes 10778 OHIPs from 9348 individuals (N=6349 general population subjects, N=2999 prosthodontic patients). To elucidate the OHIP latent structure, the aggregated data were split into a Learning Sample (N=5173) for exploratory analyses and a Validation Sample (N=5022) for confirmatory analyses. Additional data (N=583) were assigned to a third data set. CONCLUSION: The Dimensions of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Project contains a large amount of international data and is representative of populations where OHIP is intended to be used. It is well-suited to assess the dimensionality of the questionnaire.
PURPOSE: A desideratum of oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) instruments - such as the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) - is that they accurately reflect the structure of the measured construct(s). With this goal in mind, the Dimensions of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (DOQ) Project was proposed to investigate the number and nature of OHRQoL dimensions measured by OHIP. In this report, we describe our aggregate data set for the factor analyses in the project, which consists of responses to the 49-item OHIP from general population subjects and prosthodontics patients from 6 countries, including a large age range of adult subjects and both genders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The DOQ Project's aggregate data set combines data from 35 individual studies conducted in Croatia, Germany, Hungary, Japan, Slovenia, and Sweden. RESULTS: The combined data set includes 10778 OHIPs from 9348 individuals (N=6349 general population subjects, N=2999 prosthodontic patients). To elucidate the OHIP latent structure, the aggregated data were split into a Learning Sample (N=5173) for exploratory analyses and a Validation Sample (N=5022) for confirmatory analyses. Additional data (N=583) were assigned to a third data set. CONCLUSION: The Dimensions of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Project contains a large amount of international data and is representative of populations where OHIP is intended to be used. It is well-suited to assess the dimensionality of the questionnaire.
Authors: Saila Sutinen; Satu Lahti; Nigel M Nuttall; Anne E Sanders; Jimmy G Steele; P Finbarr Allen; Gary D Slade Journal: Eur J Oral Sci Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 2.612
Authors: Mike T John; Daniel R Reissmann; Asja Čelebić; Kazuyoshi Baba; Dóra Kende; Pernilla Larsson; Ksenija Rener-Sitar Journal: J Dent Date: 2016-06-25 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Ira Sierwald; Mike T John; Oliver Schierz; Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann; Daniel R Reissmann Journal: J Orofac Orthop Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 1.938
Authors: M T John; D R Reissmann; L Feuerstahler; N Waller; K Baba; P Larsson; A Celebić; G Szabo; K Rener-Sitar Journal: J Oral Rehabil Date: 2014-06-09 Impact factor: 3.837
Authors: M T John; L Feuerstahler; N Waller; K Baba; P Larsson; A Celebić; D Kende; K Rener-Sitar; D R Reissmann Journal: J Oral Rehabil Date: 2014-06-09 Impact factor: 3.837
Authors: Daniel R Reissmann; Antje Erler; Christian Hirsch; Ira Sierwald; Carolina Machuca; Oliver Schierz Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Mike T John; Stella Sekulić; Katrin Bekes; Mohammad H Al-Harthy; Ambra Michelotti; Daniel R Reissmann; Julijana Nikolovska; Sahityaveera Sanivarapu; Folake B Lawal; Thomas List; Sanja Peršić Kiršić; Ljiljana Strajnić; Rodrigo Casassus; Kazuyoshi Baba; Martin Schimmel; Ama Amuasi; Ruwan D Jayasinghe; Sanela Strujić-Porović; Christopher C Peck; Han Xie; Karina Haugaard Bendixen; Miguel Angel Simancas Pallares; Eka Perez-Franco; Mohammad Mehdi Naghibi Sistani; Patricia Valerio; Natalia Letunova; Nazik M Nurelhuda; David W Bartlett; Ikeoluwa A Oluwafemi; Saloua Dghoughi; Joao N A R Ferreira; Pathamas Chantaracherd; Ksenija Rener-Sitar Journal: J Evid Based Dent Pract Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 5.267