Literature DB >> 24440363

Feasibility of computerized adaptive testing for collection of patient-reported outcomes after inpatient rehabilitation.

Alex W K Wong1, Allen W Heinemann2, Ana Miskovic3, Patrick Semik3, Thomas M Snyder4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of computer adaptive testing (CAT) using an Internet or telephone interface to collect patient-reported outcomes after inpatient rehabilitation and to examine patient characteristics associated with completion of the CAT-administered measure and mode of administration.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of patients contacted approximately 4 weeks after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Patients selected an Internet or telephone interface.
SETTING: Rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=674) with diagnoses of neurologic, orthopedic, or medically complex conditions.
INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: CAT version of the Community Participation Indicators (CAT-CPI).
RESULTS: From an eligible pool of 3221 patients, 674 (21%) agreed to complete the CAT-CPI. Patients who agreed to complete the CAT-CPI were younger and reported slightly higher satisfaction with overall care than those who did not participate. Among these patients, 231 (34%) actually completed the CAT-CPI; 141 (61%) selected telephone administration, and 90 (39%) selected Internet administration. Decreased odds of completing the CAT-CPI were associated with black and other race; stroke, brain injury, or orthopedic and other impairments; and being a Medicaid beneficiary, whereas increased odds of completing the CAT-CPI were associated with longer length of stay and higher discharge FIM cognition measure. Decreased odds of choosing Internet administration were associated with younger age, retirement status, and being a woman, whereas increased odds of choosing Internet administration were associated with higher discharge FIM motor measure.
CONCLUSIONS: CAT administration by Internet and telephone has limited feasibility for collecting postrehabilitation outcomes for most rehabilitation patients, but it is feasible for a subset of patients. Providing alternative ways of answering questions helps assure that a larger proportion of patients will respond.
Copyright © 2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Outcome assessment (health care); Rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24440363     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.12.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  4 in total

1.  Applying Computerized Adaptive Testing to the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ): A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Tessa Magnée; Derek P de Beurs; Berend Terluin; Peter F Verhaak
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2017-02-21

2.  A Mobile Health App for the Collection of Functional Outcomes After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Li Li; Jia Huang; Jingsong Wu; Cai Jiang; Shanjia Chen; Guanli Xie; Jinxin Ren; Jing Tao; Chetwyn C H Chan; Lidian Chen; Alex W K Wong
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.773

3.  Computerized adaptive testing to screen children for emotional and behavioral problems by preventive child healthcare.

Authors:  Meinou H C Theunissen; Marianne S de Wolff; Jacqueline A Deurloo; Anton G C Vogels; Sijmen A Reijneveld
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 2.125

Review 4.  Remote Follow-Up Technologies in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Brandon G Smith; Stasa Tumpa; Orla Mantle; Charlotte J Whiffin; Harry Mee; Davi J Fontoura Solla; Wellingson S Paiva; Virginia F J Newcombe; Angelos G Kolias; Peter J Hutchinson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 4.869

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.