Literature DB >> 24440326

Relation of prenatal diagnosis with one-year survival rate for infants with congenital heart disease.

Lydia K Wright1, Alexandra Ehrlich2, Nanci Stauffer3, Cyrus Samai3, Brian Kogon3, Matthew E Oster4.   

Abstract

Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects (CHDs) is increasingly common, but it is still unclear whether it translates to improved postoperative outcomes. We performed a retrospective cohort study of all infants (aged <1 year) who underwent surgery for CHDs from 2006 to 2011 at a single institution. Primary outcomes were in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates. Secondary outcomes were readmission within 30 days of discharge, postoperative length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, unplanned reoperation, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use. We used chi-square analyses, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models to compare outcomes. Of the 1,642 patients with CHDs, 539 (33%) were diagnosed prenatally. Patients with prenatal diagnoses were of a younger age and less weight at the time of surgery, had greater Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery scores, and were more likely to be white, to have an identified syndrome, or to be born at term. Compared with those diagnosed postnatally, those diagnosed prenatally had a significantly higher unadjusted 1-year mortality rate (11% vs 5.5%, respectively, p = 0.03). Controlling for weight, surgical severity, race, age at surgery, prematurity, and the presence or absence of genetic syndrome, patients with prenatal diagnoses had significantly greater mortality at 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio 1.5, p = 0.03), as well as significantly longer intensive care unit and hospital stays. Infants with CHDs diagnosed prenatally had worse outcomes compared with those diagnosed postnatally. Prenatal diagnosis likely captures patients with more severe phenotypes within given surgical risk categories and even within diagnoses and thus may be an important prognostic factor when counseling families.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24440326     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.11.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  10 in total

Review 1.  Prenatal Counseling of Fetal Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Caroline K Lee
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-01

2.  Association of Prenatal Diagnosis of Critical Congenital Heart Disease With Postnatal Brain Development and the Risk of Brain Injury.

Authors:  Shabnam Peyvandi; Veronica De Santiago; Elavazhagan Chakkarapani; Vann Chau; Andrew Campbell; Kenneth J Poskitt; Duan Xu; A James Barkovich; Steven Miller; Patrick McQuillen
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 16.193

3.  Timing and Mode of Delivery in Prenatally Diagnosed Congenital Heart Disease- an Analysis of Practices within the University of California Fetal Consortium (UCfC).

Authors:  Shabnam Peyvandi; Tina Ahn Thu Thi Nguyen; Myriam Almeida-Jones; Nina Boe; Laila Rhee; Tracy Anton; Mark Sklansky; Maryam Tarsa; Gary Satou; Anita J Moon-Grady
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Trends in Preterm Delivery among Singleton Gestations with Critical Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Daniel A Castellanos; Keila N Lopez; Jason L Salemi; Alireza A Shamshirsaz; Yunfei Wang; Shaine A Morris
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Disparities in the prenatal detection of critical congenital heart disease.

Authors:  G D Hill; J R Block; J B Tanem; M A Frommelt
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Prenatal Diagnosis Influences Preoperative Status in Neonates with Congenital Heart Disease: An Analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database.

Authors:  Michael D Quartermain; Kevin D Hill; David J Goldberg; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Marshall L Jacobs; Sara K Pasquali; George R Verghese; Amelia S Wallace; Ross M Ungerleider
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 1.655

7.  The significance of an integrated management mode of prenatal diagnosis-postnatal treatment for critical congenital heart disease in newborns.

Authors:  Xiaohui Zhang; Shaoru He; Yumei Liu; Jing Zhong; Yunxia Sun; Manli Zheng; Juan Gui; Ruixi Wang; Bowen Feng; Jianling Mo; Minqiao Jian; Caisheng Liu; Yijing Liang
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-04

8.  Impact of prenatal diagnosis on survival of newborns with four congenital heart defects: a prospective, population-based cohort study in France (the EPICARD Study).

Authors:  Babak Khoshnood; Nathalie Lelong; Lucile Houyel; Damien Bonnet; Morgane Ballon; Jean-Marie Jouannic; François Goffinet
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Comparison of the 1-year survival rate in infants with congenital heart disease diagnosed by prenatal and postnatal ultrasound: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Bing Han; Yi Tang; Xueling Qu; Chuanjun Deng; Xing Wang; Jie Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Survival in Children With Congenital Heart Disease: Have We Reached a Peak at 97%?

Authors:  Zacharias Mandalenakis; Kok Wai Giang; Peter Eriksson; Hans Liden; Mats Synnergren; Håkan Wåhlander; Maria Fedchenko; Annika Rosengren; Mikael Dellborg
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 5.501

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.