Literature DB >> 24440121

Pre- and post-stimulus EEG patterns associated with the touch-induced illusory flash.

Jan B F van Erp1, Tom G Philippi2, Ksander N de Winkel2, Peter Werkhoven3.   

Abstract

Pairing two brief auditory beeps with a single flash can evoke the percept of a second, illusory, flash. Investigations of the underlying neural mechanisms are limited to post-stimulus effects of this sound-induced illusory flash. We investigated whether touch modulates the visual evoked potential in a similar vein, and also looked at pre-stimulus activity. Electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded over occipital and parieto-occipital areas of 12 observers. We compared bimodal EEG to its unimodal constituents (i.e., the difference waves) and found significant positive deflections around 110 ms and 200 ms and negative deflections around 330 ms and 390 ms from stimulus onset. These results are similar to those reported for the sound-induced illusion, albeit somewhat later. Furthermore, comparison of the EEG activity between those trials in which the illusion was perceived and those in which it was absent revealed that the phase of pre-stimulus alpha was linked to perceiving the illusion or not. We conclude that touch can modulate activity in the visual cortex and that similar neural mechanisms underlie perception of the sound- and touch-induced illusory flash and that the phase of the alpha wave at the moment of presentation that affects perception.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Alpha; EEG; Illusion; Illusory flash; Multisensory; Pre-stimulus

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24440121     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  3 in total

1.  Individual differences in alpha frequency drive crossmodal illusory perception.

Authors:  Roberto Cecere; Geraint Rees; Vincenzo Romei
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  How to Evaluate Phase Differences between Trial Groups in Ongoing Electrophysiological Signals.

Authors:  Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 3.  Effects of Aging in Multisensory Integration: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alix L de Dieuleveult; Petra C Siemonsma; Jan B F van Erp; Anne-Marie Brouwer
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 5.750

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.