Literature DB >> 24439678

A higher d-dimer threshold safely rules-out pulmonary embolism in very elderly emergency department patients.

Hernan Polo Friz1, Lorenzo Pasciuti2, Dario Francesco Meloni2, Matteo Crippa2, Giulia Villa2, Mauro Molteni2, Laura Primitz2, Davide Del Sorbo2, Giovanni Delgrossi2, Claudio Cimminiello2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: D-dimer is commonly used in the workup of suspected Pulmonary Embolism (PE), but its specificity decreases with age. We evaluated whether using a higher cutoff value for D-dimer could increase the test specificity without reducing its sensitivity for ruling-out PE in elderly and very elderly patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients with D-dimer and pulmonary Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) performed in the ED of Vimercate Hospital, from 2010 through 2012 for clinical suspicion of PE were included in this retrospective cohort study.
RESULTS: Study population 481 patients (63.4% women, mean age 73.0 ± 16.1 years, confirmed PE 22.5%). In very elderly patients (aged 80 or more years, n=191), compared with standard 490 ng/mL D-dimer threshold, both higher fixed (1000 ng/mL) and age-adjusted cutoffs increase the specificity of D-dimer for the exclusion of PE maintaining a Negative Predictive Value of 100%. Potentially avoided CTAs were 12(6.3%) using 1000 ng/mL cutoff and 10(5.2%) age-adjusted. In very elderly patients the Number Needed to Test was incalculable for the standard cutoff (0 cases), 16 for 1000 ng/mL and 19 for age-adjusted. In patients with PE, index episode mortality was 6.5%, and death occurred only in subjects with D-dimer values above 1000ng/mL and age-adjusted thresholds.
CONCLUSION: For very elderly patients with suspected PE in ED, both higher fixed D-dimer (1000 ng/mL) and age-adjusted thresholds increase test specificity for excluding PE without reducing its sensitivity, leading to a safe reduction in the number of CTAs.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cutoff values; D-dimer; Pulmonary computed tomography angiography; Pulmonary embolism; Very elderly

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24439678     DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.12.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  4 in total

1.  Prognostic value of D-dimer in elderly patients with Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  Hernan Polo Friz; Chiara Buzzini; Annalisa Orenti; Veronica Punzi; Mauro Molteni; Laura Primitz; Luca Cavalieri d'Oro; Guido Arpaia; Patrizia Boracchi; Claudio Cimminiello
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Mortality at 30 and 90 days in elderly patients with pulmonary embolism: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hernan Polo Friz; Mauro Molteni; Davide Del Sorbo; Lorenzo Pasciuti; Matteo Crippa; Giulia Villa; Dario Francesco Meloni; Laura Primitz; Andrea Galli; Magda Rognoni; Luca Cavalieri d'Oro; Guido Arpaia; Claudio Cimminiello
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 3.  Impact of d-Dimers on the Differential Diagnosis of Acute Chest Pain: Current Aspects Besides the Widely Known.

Authors:  Kathrin Hahne; Pia Lebiedz; Frank Breuckmann
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-19

4.  Age-Adjusted D-Dimer in the Prediction of Pulmonary Embolism: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kenneth Iwuji; Hasan Almekdash; Kenneth M Nugent; Ebtesam Islam; Briget Hyde; Jonathan Kopel; Adaugo Opiegbe; Duke Appiah
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.