David M Barrett1, Nathan Singh2, Xiaojun Liu2, Shuguang Jiang2, Carl H June2, Stephan A Grupp3, Yangbing Zhao2. 1. Division of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address: barrettd@email.chop.edu. 2. Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute, University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 3. Division of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Pathology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AIMS: Cytotoxic T lymphocytes modified with chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) for adoptive immunotherapy of hematologic malignancies are effective in pre-clinical models, and this efficacy has translated to success in several clinical trials. Many early trials were disappointing in large part because of the lack of proliferation and subsequent persistence of transferred cells. Recent investigations have pointed to the importance of delivering highly proliferative cells, whether of naive or early memory phenotypes. METHODS: We investigated the influence of two common cell culturing methods used in early trials and their relationship to T-cell phenotype and pre-clinical efficacy. RESULTS: We observed that stimulation with soluble anti-CD3 antibody OKT-3 and high-dose interleukin-2 produces more effector memory-type T cells with shorter average telomeres when compared with cells generated with the use of CD3/CD28 beads. When used in xenograft models of leukemia, bead-stimulated cells proliferated earlier and to a higher degree than those generated with the use of OKT-3/IL2 and resulted in better disease control despite no difference in distribution or migration throughout the mouse. Inclusion of the known successful clinical 4-1BB endodomain in the CAR could not rescue the function of OKT-3/IL-2-cultured cells. T cells isolated from animals that survived long-term (>120 days) retained a central memory-like phenotype and demonstrated a memory response to a large re-challenge of CD19-positive leukemia. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we confirm that cells with a younger phenotype or higher proliferative capacity perform better in pre-clinical models and that cell culturing influences cell phenotype seemingly independent of the 4-1BB endodomain in the CAR structure.
BACKGROUND AIMS: Cytotoxic T lymphocytes modified with chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) for adoptive immunotherapy of hematologic malignancies are effective in pre-clinical models, and this efficacy has translated to success in several clinical trials. Many early trials were disappointing in large part because of the lack of proliferation and subsequent persistence of transferred cells. Recent investigations have pointed to the importance of delivering highly proliferative cells, whether of naive or early memory phenotypes. METHODS: We investigated the influence of two common cell culturing methods used in early trials and their relationship to T-cell phenotype and pre-clinical efficacy. RESULTS: We observed that stimulation with soluble anti-CD3 antibody OKT-3 and high-dose interleukin-2 produces more effector memory-type T cells with shorter average telomeres when compared with cells generated with the use of CD3/CD28 beads. When used in xenograft models of leukemia, bead-stimulated cells proliferated earlier and to a higher degree than those generated with the use of OKT-3/IL2 and resulted in better disease control despite no difference in distribution or migration throughout the mouse. Inclusion of the known successful clinical 4-1BB endodomain in the CAR could not rescue the function of OKT-3/IL-2-cultured cells. T cells isolated from animals that survived long-term (>120 days) retained a central memory-like phenotype and demonstrated a memory response to a large re-challenge of CD19-positive leukemia. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we confirm that cells with a younger phenotype or higher proliferative capacity perform better in pre-clinical models and that cell culturing influences cell phenotype seemingly independent of the 4-1BB endodomain in the CAR structure.
Authors: Michael Kalos; Bruce L Levine; David L Porter; Sharyn Katz; Stephan A Grupp; Adam Bagg; Carl H June Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2011-08-10 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Christian Stemberger; Michael Neuenhahn; Friedemann E Gebhardt; Matthias Schiemann; Veit R Buchholz; Dirk H Busch Journal: Semin Immunol Date: 2009-03-09 Impact factor: 11.130
Authors: Chrystal U Louis; Barbara Savoldo; Gianpietro Dotti; Martin Pule; Eric Yvon; G Doug Myers; Claudia Rossig; Heidi V Russell; Oumar Diouf; Enli Liu; Hao Liu; Meng-Fen Wu; Adrian P Gee; Zhuyong Mei; Cliona M Rooney; Helen E Heslop; Malcolm K Brenner Journal: Blood Date: 2011-10-07 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Chrystal M Paulos; Carmine Carpenito; Gabriela Plesa; Megan M Suhoski; Angel Varela-Rohena; Tatiana N Golovina; Richard G Carroll; James L Riley; Carl H June Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2010-10-27 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: David M Barrett; Alix E Seif; Carmine Carpenito; David T Teachey; Jonathan D Fish; Carl H June; Stephan A Grupp; Gregor S D Reid Journal: Blood Date: 2011-08-19 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Renier J Brentjens; Isabelle Rivière; Jae H Park; Marco L Davila; Xiuyan Wang; Jolanta Stefanski; Clare Taylor; Raymond Yeh; Shirley Bartido; Oriana Borquez-Ojeda; Malgorzata Olszewska; Yvette Bernal; Hollie Pegram; Mark Przybylowski; Daniel Hollyman; Yelena Usachenko; Domenick Pirraglia; James Hosey; Elmer Santos; Elizabeth Halton; Peter Maslak; David Scheinberg; Joseph Jurcic; Mark Heaney; Glenn Heller; Mark Frattini; Michel Sadelain Journal: Blood Date: 2011-08-17 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Michael C Milone; Jonathan D Fish; Carmine Carpenito; Richard G Carroll; Gwendolyn K Binder; David Teachey; Minu Samanta; Mehdi Lakhal; Brian Gloss; Gwenn Danet-Desnoyers; Dario Campana; James L Riley; Stephan A Grupp; Carl H June Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2009-04-21 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Luca Gattinoni; Enrico Lugli; Yun Ji; Zoltan Pos; Chrystal M Paulos; Máire F Quigley; Jorge R Almeida; Emma Gostick; Zhiya Yu; Carmine Carpenito; Ena Wang; Daniel C Douek; David A Price; Carl H June; Francesco M Marincola; Mario Roederer; Nicholas P Restifo Journal: Nat Med Date: 2011-09-18 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Fei Yi; Nicholas Frazzette; Anthony C Cruz; Christopher A Klebanoff; Richard M Siegel Journal: Trends Mol Med Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 11.951
Authors: J Joseph Melenhorst; Michael C Milone; Saba Ghassemi; Selene Nunez-Cruz; Roddy S O'Connor; Joseph A Fraietta; Prachi R Patel; John Scholler; David M Barrett; Stefan M Lundh; Megan M Davis; Felipe Bedoya; Changfeng Zhang; John Leferovich; Simon F Lacey; Bruce L Levine; Stephan A Grupp; Carl H June Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 11.151
Authors: Christopher A Klebanoff; Joseph G Crompton; Anthony J Leonardi; Tori N Yamamoto; Smita S Chandran; Robert L Eil; Madhusudhanan Sukumar; Suman K Vodnala; Jinhui Hu; Yun Ji; David Clever; Mary A Black; Devikala Gurusamy; Michael J Kruhlak; Ping Jin; David F Stroncek; Luca Gattinoni; Steven A Feldman; Nicholas P Restifo Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2017-12-07