Literature DB >> 24438984

Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humerus malunions.

Justin A Jacobson1, Thomas R Duquin1, Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo1, Cathy D Schleck1, John W Sperling1, Robert H Cofield2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Malunion of proximal humeral fractures complicated by damage to the glenohumeral cartilage and injury to the joint capsule and rotator cuff can include treatment requiring anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. This study defines results and complications of this procedure and identifies factors associated with success or failure.
METHODS: From 1976 to 2007, 109 patients underwent shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus malunions. Ninety-five met the criteria for analysis with a mean follow-up period of 9.2 years. Fracture types according to the Neer classification were two part in 20, three part in 37, four part in 31, and head splitting in 2, with 16 fracture-dislocations. Hemiarthroplasty was performed in 45 patients, with 50 undergoing total arthroplasty.
RESULTS: Pain scores improved from 7.8 to 3.1 (P < .001). The mean active elevation and external rotation improved from 69° to 109° and from 8° and 39°, respectively (P = .001). Of 31 patients with available radiographs, 20 had healed tuberosity osteotomies. Sixteen complications required 10 reoperations, including 6 of 9 patients with severe postoperative instability. There were 57 excellent or satisfactory results by use of the Neer rating. No patient, injury pattern, previous treatment, surgical, or radiologic variation was significantly associated with an increased risk of an unsatisfactory result, except for severe postoperative instability. Kaplan-Meier survivorship for reoperation, in 109 shoulders, was 94.8% (95% confidence interval, 90.5%-99.4%) at 5 years and 90.1% (95% confidence interval, 83.6%-97.1%) at 10 and 15 years.
CONCLUSION: Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty improves pain and motion. Surgery is complex. Tuberosity osteotomies often heal. Postoperative instability is the most common complication leading to reoperation and is usually associated with rotator cuff and shoulder capsule injury.
Copyright © 2014 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Proximal humerus malunion; shoulder arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24438984     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Posttraumatic arthrosis of the glenohumeral joint. From partial resurfacing to reverse shoulder arthroplasty].

Authors:  N Matis; R Ortmaier; P Moroder; H Resch; A Auffarth
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Treatment of fracture sequelae of the proximal humerus: anatomical vs reverse shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  Pierre Mansat; Nicolas Bonnevialle
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Chronic posterior dislocation of shoulder.

Authors:  Ravi Mittal; Siddharth Jain; Shivanand Gamanagatti
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-06-21

4.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture sequelae: How the initial fracture treatment influences the outcomes of joint replacement.

Authors:  Fernando Santana; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Pau Guirro; Carlos Torrens
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 1.511

5.  Rotator cuff to deltoid and pectoralis tendon to anatomic neck distances: methods for anatomic restoration of humeral height and tuberosity position in proximal humerus fractures for operative fixation and arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jonathan W Cheah; Edward L Baldwin; Jeffrey A O'Donnell; Gregory Pereira; Danica D Vance; Tally E Lassiter; Oke A Anakwenze
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-08-26

6.  Effectiveness of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for primary and secondary fracture care: mid-term outcomes in a single-centre experience.

Authors:  A M Schwarz; G M Hohenberger; M Sauerschnig; M Niks; G Lipnik; G Mattiassich; M Zacherl; F J Seibert; M Plecko
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.