High feeding intensity increases the severity of fatty liver in the American mink (Neovison vison) with potential ameliorating role for long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids.

BACKGROUND: Rapid body fat mobilization, obesity, and an inadequate supply of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) have been suggested to play roles in the etiology of fatty liver in the American mink (Neovison vison). This study examined the effects of feeding intensity and dietary fat source on fatty liver induced by fasting. In a multi-factorial design, 3 different fat sources (herring oil, rich in n-3 PUFA, soya oil, rich in n-6 PUFA, and canola oil, rich in n-9 monounsaturated fatty acids) were fed to mink at a low and high feeding intensity for 10 weeks, followed by an overnight or a 5-day fasting treatment to induce fatty liver.
RESULTS: Fasting led to the development of fatty liver with increased severity in the mink fed at the high feeding intensity. The herring oil diet, high in long-chain n-3 PUFA, was found to decrease the severity of fatty liver in the mink at the high feeding intensity.
CONCLUSION: Preventing excessive weight gain and increasing dietary intake of n-3 long-chain PUFA may help prevent excessive lipid accumulation during prolonged periods of fasting or inappetence by promoting hepatic fatty acid oxidation.

Background

Fatty liver syndrome is a common metabolic disease in farmed American mink (Neovison vison) and it has been reported to develop during acute stressful periods, when mink may show a loss in appetite for a few days [1]. Hepatic fatty infiltration is also a common pathological finding in female mink with nursing sickness [2]. Experimentally, food withdrawal has been used to model the development of the disease, with hepatic lipid accumulation occurring in less than 5 days of fasting [3]. Food deprivation can also result in borderline steatohepatitis in a closely related species, the European polecat (Mustela putorius) [4]. Studies using the mink model have shown that fat depots, particularly intra-abdominal, are readily mobilized during fasting and there is selective mobilization of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) from the adipose tissue and depletion in the liver [5]. This suggests that causative factors in mustelid fatty liver could be the rapid mobilization of body fat during fasting, obesity, and loss of n-3 PUFA, with similarities to human non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and feline hepatic lipidosis [3,4,6].

Excessive body fat is a common risk factor for fatty liver in both mink and cats (Felis catus) [1,7], and it is correlated with the severity of fatty liver in humans [8]. Increased adiposity in mink can lead to elevated blood glucose levels and the development of hyperinsulinemia [9]; derangements which, in humans, are associated with the severity of hepatic steatosis [10]. Furthermore, increased adiposity may increase circulating levels of free fatty acids (FFA) and subsequently the quantity of FFA the liver is exposed to [11,12].

The composition of dietary fats may also influence fatty liver, with an association of low proportions of n-3 PUFA or a high n-6:n-3 PUFA ratio with hepatic lipid accumulation [13]. The long-chain n-3 PUFA, 20:5n-3 and 22:6n-3, are suggested to be the most effective in preventing or ameliorating the development of fatty liver [14-17]. Within the liver, increasing long-chain n-3 PUFA may alter the balance between fatty acid oxidation and lipid secretion vs. de novo lipogenesis, and thereby reduce overall lipid accumulation [2]. This could make dietary fat an important consideration for mink as they are probably unable to sufficiently synthesize the long-chain n-3 and n-6 PUFA from their precursors [18].

Fatty liver disease in mink is initially asymptomatic and develops rapidly to the severe stages, thus the focus needs to be on preventative measures rather than treatment. Studies have examined the effect of diet on hepatic lipid content under normal physiological conditions [18] and the relationship between body fat and hepatic lipid content in fasted mink [19], but neither has been investigated directly during the development of fatty liver. The aim of this study was to examine how feeding intensity (FI) and dietary fat sources varying in n-3 and n-6 PUFA affect the development of fasting-induced fatty liver in mink.

Methods

Seventy-two standard black five-month-old mink (36 male, 36 female) were used at the Canadian Centre for Fur Animal Research (Truro, NS). The mink were housed individually in pens (W × H × L: 30 cm × 45 cm × 75 cm) with wood chip-bedded nest boxes. The study was carried out in accordance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care [20] and approval of the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Dalhousie University, Faculty of Agriculture (formerly Nova Scotia Agricultural College, Truro; Permit ACUC#2007-041).

In this multi-factorial study, each mink was assigned to an experimental diet containing herring oil (HO), soya oil (SO), or canola oil (CO) as the dietary fat source (Tables 1 and 2), and the diets were formulated to meet the nutritional recommendations for mink [21]. Fatty acid profiles of the diets were analyzed using gas–liquid chromatography (GC-FID and GC-MS, 6890 N network GC-system, Agilent Technologies Inc., Palo Alto, CA) [22]. Each diet was fed either at a low feeding intensity (LFI) of 80% recommended dietary allowance (RDA) or a high feeding intensity (HFI) of 120% RDA, with the RDA adjusted for sex, month, and metabolic body weight (BW0.75 kg) [21]. BW and feed intake were measured monthly over a three-day period by determining the amount of feed left uneaten.

Table 1

Ingredient formulation of the herring oil, soya oil, and canola oil experimental diets

	Diet
Ingredient, g/kg	Herring oil	Soya oil	Canola oil
Cod racks	525	525	525
Pork liver	135	135	135
Pork spleen	70	70	70
Extruded barley	144	144	144
Corn gluten meal	31	31	31
Herring oil	47	-	-
Soya oil	-	47	-
Canola oil	-	-	47
Vitamin mineral premixa	4	4	4
Water	44	44	44

aVitamin Mineral Premix growing/furring [(concentration/purity), amount per tonne of premix]: vitamin A (600 × 105 IU/kg), 600 IU; vitamin D (500 × 105 IU/kg), 600 IU; vitamin E (500 000 IU/kg), 150 IU; vitamin K (33%), 0.66 g; vitamin C (97.5%), 94.6 g; riboflavin (95%), 47.5 g; DL Ca-pantothenate (45%), 6.30 g; niacin (99%), 19.8 g; vitamin B12 (1000 mg/kg), 0.02 g; folic acid (3%), 0.45 g; biotin (2%), 0.1 g; choline chloride (60%), 600 g; thiamine (97 × 104 mg/kg), 3.88 g; pyridoxine (99 × 104 mg/kg), 4.95 g; manganous oxide (60%), 10.8 g; zinc oxide (80%), 30.4 g; cupric sulphate (25%), 5 g; cobalt carbonate (45%), 0.45 g; selenium premix (675 mg/kg), 0.22 g; ferrous sulphate (27%), 99.9 g; ground limestone (38%), 190 g; ethoxyquin (50%), 45 g; wheat middlings 3324 g.

Table 2

Nutrient composition and fatty acid profiles of the herring oil, soya oil, and canola oil experimental diets

		Experimental diet
		Herring oil	Soya oil	Canola oil
Composition	n	3	3	3
(as fed)	Dry Matter, %	39.1 ± 0.7	39.8 ± 0.9	39.5 ± 0.5
	Crude Protein, %	15.1 ± 0.3	15.6 ± 0.5	14.8 ± 0.3
	Crude Fat, %	6.7 ± 0.4	7.7 ± 0.9	6.5 ± 0.5
	Carbohydrate, %	12.5 ± 0.8	13.5 ± 1.2	13.86 ± 0.5
	Ash, %	4.0 ± 0.2	3.8 ± 0.2	3.8 ± 0.3
	ME1, kJ/kg	6364 ± 100	6904 ± 301	6414 ± 117
Fatty acid profile,	Total SFA	25.7 ± 0.5A	20.4 ± 0.4B	14.9 ± 0.5C
molar%	18:1n-9 + 11	10.6 ± 0.5C	17.4 ± 0.4B	48.3 ± 0.5A
	22:1n-11	17.34 ± 0.05A	0.13 ± 0.03B	0.08 ± 0.01C
	Total MUFA	53.17 ± 0.29A	20.99 ± 0.29B	53.85 ± 0.29A
	18:2n-6	8.86 ± 0.08C	45.98 ± 0.08A	21.18 ± 0.02B
	20:4n-6	1.47 ± 0.13	1.23 ± 0.13	1.08 ± 0.13
	Total n-6 PUFA	10.83 ± 0.55C	47.56 ± 0.55A	22.61 ± 0.55B
	18:3n-3	0.75 ± 0.14C	8.12 ±0.14A	6.65 ± 0.14B
	20:5n-3	4.05 ± 0.07A	0.82 ± 0.07B	0.54 ± 0.07C
	22:6n-3	3.40 ± 0.18A	1.52 ± 0.18B	1.03 ± 0.18B
	Total n-3 PUFA	10.29 ± 0.29A	10.97 ± 0.29A	8.57 ± 0.29B
	n-6:n-3 PUFA	1.05 ± 0.03C	4.35 ± 0.03A	2.63 ± 0.03B

Values are lsmeans ± SEM. Labeled means with no common letters differ within row (P ≤ 0.05). Metabolizable energy, ME; monounsaturated fatty acids, MUFA; polyunsaturated fatty acids, PUFA; saturated fatty acids, SFA.

1ME was calculated as the sum of each of the energy nutrients multiplied by their digestibility coefficients and energy values [(crude protein × 0.85 × 18.8 kJ/g) + (crude fat × 0.90 × 39.8 kJ/g) + (carbohydrate × 0.70 × 17.6 kJ/g)].

After feeding the dietary regimes for 10 weeks, the mink were divided further into two groups, the control group which was fasted overnight and the fasted group which was deprived of food for a 5-day period. Following the fasting treatments, the mink were anaesthetized with intramuscular injection of xylazine (3.4 mg/kg BW) and ketamine hydrochloride (8.5 mg/kg BW). A blood sample was taken by cardiac puncture (Vacutainer® EDTA tubes) and the mink were killed using an intra-cardiac injection of pentobarbital sodium (106 mg/kg BW). Immediately following euthanasia, a liver sample was flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C for later lipid extraction using the Folch method [23]. Hepato-somatic index (HSI) was calculated as follows: (liver weight, g/BW, g) × 100.

During the feeding trial, blood glucose measurements were taken postprandially using the Accu-Check Compact™ blood glucose monitor (Roche Diagnostics, Laval, QC). Clinical chemistry analyses were carried out on plasma (stored at −80°C) for urea, glucose, alanine transaminase (ALT), and alkaline phosphatase (AKPH) at the Diagnostic Services Laboratory of the Atlantic Veterinary College (Charlottetown, PEI). Further analyses were performed at the University of Eastern Finland (Joensuu, Finland) for plasma levels of triacylglycerols (TAG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and FFA as outlined by Mustonen et al. [5]. Plasma concentrations of insulin, leptin, triiodothyronine (T3), and thyroxine (T4) were determined using established validated methodology according to Mustonen et al. [24].

Statistical analysis was carried out using the Proc Mixed in SAS v.9 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) to determine significant effects and interactions, and significant differences within these interactions. The monthly BW, feed intake, and blood glucose levels were analyzed using a split-plot design, with the repeated measures option. A split-split-plot design was used for the final blood analyses. To simplify analysis, in cases of a 3-way interaction that included fasting as an effect or a 4-way interaction, comparisons were made within the control and fasted mink, and between the individual control and fasted treatments only. The Pearson’s correlation coefficients (rp) were calculated using SAS v.9. P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant and the P-values are included in the online additional documentation (Additional files 1, 2 and 3). Results are presented as lsmeans ± SEM.

Results

Feed intake and body weights

Feed intake was higher in the males compared to the females (1452 ± 25 kJ/day and 84.1 ± 1.5 g DM/day vs. 1038 ± 25 kJ/day and 60.0 ± 1.5 g DM/day). The mink fed at the LFI had a constant feed intake of 80% RDA throughout the trial, while intake increased in the HFI group over time, reaching 103% RDA at the end of the trial (Table 3). Diet also influenced feed intake, with increased caloric consumption from October to November only in the HO group.

Table 3

Feed intake of the mink fed at the LFI and HFI and fed the herring oil, soya oil, and canola oil experimental diets during the feeding trial period

	Feed intake, kJ/day		Feed intake, % RDA
	Feeding intensity		Feeding intensity
	LFI	HFI	LFI	HFI
October	1147 ± 33Ab	1223 ± 37Ba	80 ± 2Ab	89 ± 2Ba
November	1114 ± 29Ab	1495 ± 29Aa	80 ± 1Ab	103 ± 1Aa
	Feed intake, kJ/day
	Diet
	Herring oil	Soya oil	Canola oil
October	1193 ± 45B	1196 ± 45	1164 ± 45
November	1461 ± 36Aa	1285 ± 36b	1160 ± 36c

Values are lsmeans ± SEM. Labeled means with no common capital letters differ within the column, and means with no common lowercase letters differ within the row (P ≤ 0.05). High feeding intensity, HFI; low feeding intensity, LFI; recommended dietary allowance, RDA.

During the feeding trial, both sexes lost weight when fed at the LFI, however, in the HFI group, only males exhibited significant weight gain (Table 4). The feeding trial resulted in two distinct BW groups in both sexes. These BW distinctions remained after the fasting period and at final sampling. The difference in the final BW revealed the fasted mink to be generally lighter than the controls, with heavier males in the HO group.

Table 4

Mink body weight during the feeding trial, at the end of the fasting period, and final body weight and liver weight at sampling

		Body weight during feeding trial, g
		Sex × feeding intensity interaction
		Male			Female
		LFI	HFI		LFI	HFI
	Sep 27	2381 ± 47A	2376 ± 47B		1271 ± 47A	1287 ± 47
	Oct 25	2283 ± 47B*	2511 ± 47A		1202 ± 47B*	1326 ± 47
	Nov 22	2072 ± 47C*	2528 ± 47A		1096 ± 47C*	1324 ± 47
		Body weights during the 5-day fasting period, g
		Feeding intensity			Sex
		LFI	HFI		Male	Female
	24-hour fasting	1411 ± 64C	1851 ± 64A		2153 ± 75A	1108 ± 75C
	5-day fasting	1211 ± 64D	1640 ± 64B		1902 ± 75B	949 ± 75D
		Final weight at sampling, g
		Sex × feeding intensity interaction
		Male			Female
		LFI	HFI		LFI	HFI
	Body weight	1770 ± 78B	2338 ± 78A		909 ± 78D	1168 ± 78C
	Liver weight	41.9 ± 1.7B	55.1 ± 1.7A		25.2 ± 1.7D	30.9 ± 1.7C
		Sex × diet interaction
		Male			Female
		Herring oil	Soya oil	Canola oil	Herring oil	Soya oil	Canola oil
Body weight	Control	2504 ± 106A*	2117 ± 106B	1999 ± 106B	1085 ± 106C	1155 ± 106C	1143 ± 106C
	Fasted	1867 ± 106A	1884 ± 106A	1954 ± 106A	1025 ± 106B	928 ± 106B	895 ± 106B
Liver weight	Control	54.7 ± 2.4A*	45.6 ± 2.4B	44.8 ± 2.4B	27.6 ± 2.4C	27.4 ± 2.4C	28.7 ± 2.4C
	Fasted	47.0 ± 2.4A	48.3 ± 2.4A	49.5 ± 2.4A	30.4 ± 2.4B	27.3 ± 2.4B	26.8 ± 2.4B

Values are lsmeans ± SEM. For feeding trial weights, labeled means with no common letters differ within sex and feeding intensity, and means with * differ between feeding intensity within sex (P ≤ 0.05). For 5-day fasting group weights, labeled means with no common letters differ within treatment response. For final body and liver weights, labeled means with no common letters differ within fasting treatments, and means with * differ between fasting treatments. High feeding intensity, HFI; low feeding intensity, LFI.

Liver health

Liver lipid% was higher in the fasted mink, and it was the highest in the mink fed at the HFI (Table 5). A significant interaction between diet and FI was observed, with the highest liver lipid levels in the mink fed the SO and CO diets at the HFI, and the lowest in the mink fed the SO diet at the LFI, which did not differ significantly from the HO groups (Table 6). Liver weights were higher in the males than females, and within sex higher in the HFI groups. No differences were observed in the females with regard to diet or fasting in liver weight; however, in the males, the heaviest livers were found in the control HO group, and their average liver weights were higher than those of the fasted HO group and the control SO and CO mink. HSI was greater in the females (females: 2.76 ± 0.06, males: 2.38 ± 0.06), and an overall higher HSI was observed in the fasted mink (control: 2.37 ± 0.08, fasted: 2.77 ± 0.08). The mink of the LFI HO group had the highest HSI, which did not differ from the HFI SO group or the LFI and HFI CO groups.

Table 5

Effect of fasting and feeding intensity on liver lipid%, plasma glucose, AKPH, and LDL-cholesterol

	Control		Fasted
	LFI	HFI	LFI	HFI
Liver Lipids, %	5.9 ± 1.1C	6.6 ± 1.1C	16.2 ± 1.1B	21.7 ± 1.1A
Glucose, mmol/L	8.3 ± 0.3A	8.5 ± 0.3A	6.5 ± 0.3C	7.6 ± 0.3B
AKPH, U/L	22 ± 3AB	21 ± 3AB	29 ± 3A	17 ± 3B
LDL-Cholesterol, mmol/L	0.58 ± 0.03A	0.41 ± 0.03B	0.28 ± 0.03C	0.26 ± 0.03C

Values are lsmeans ± SEM. Labeled means with no common letters differ within the response variable (P ≤ 0.05). Alkaline phosphatase, AKPH; high feeding intensity, HFI; low-density lipoprotein, LDL; low feeding intensity, LFI.

Table 6

Effect of the herring oil, soya oil, and canola oil experimental diets and feeding intensity on mink liver lipid%, liver weight, and HSI

	LFI			HFI
	Herring oil	Soya oil	Canola oil	Herring oil	Soya oil	Canola oil
Liver Lipids, %	11.7 ± 1.3BC	8.9 ± 1.3C	12.7 ± 1.3AB	12.0 ± 1.3BC	15.7 ± 1.3A	14.7 ± 1.3A
Liver Weight, g	37.0 ± 1.7B	30.4 ± 1.7C	33.2 ± 1.7BC	42.9 ± 1.7A	44.4 ± 1.7A	41.7 ± 1.7A
HSI	2.74 ± 0.09A	2.42 ± 0.09C	2.70 ± 0.09AB	2.43 ± 0.09BC	2.61 ± 0.09ABC	2.52 ± 0.09ABC

Values are lsmeans ± SEM. Labeled means with no common letters differ within the response variable (P ≤ 0.05). Hepato-somatic index, HSI; high feeding intensity, HFI; low feeding intensity, LFI.

Clinical chemistry and endocrinology

Blood glucose levels were the highest at the start of the feeding trial (September: 4.6 ± 0.1, October: 3.8 ± 0.1, November 3.7 ± 0.1 mmol/L). The final glucose concentrations, analyzed on plasma, were higher in the control mink, and within the fasted mink they were higher in the HFI group (Table 5). The fasted mink had higher plasma ALT activities (control: 139 ± 22, fasted: 299 ± 22 U/L). Plasma AKPH activities were higher in the fasted mink fed at the LFI compared to the HFI, but did not differ from the controls.

In the control groups, LDL-cholesterol was higher in the mink fed at the LFI than the HFI, and the levels were lower in the fasted mink where no effect of FI was found (Table 5). HDL-cholesterol was lower in the fasted mink (3.64 ± 0.08 vs. 3.32 ± 0.08 mmol/L), and the levels were also affected by FI and diet; the highest HDL-cholesterol levels were in the mink fed the SO diet at the LFI, with no differences among the other groups (Table 7). LDL- and HDL-cholesterol both showed a significant diet and sex interaction, with LDL-cholesterol being higher in the males fed the CO diet and the females fed the HO diet. The highest HDL-cholesterol levels were observed in the females fed the SO diet and the males fed the CO diet, and for both sexes the lowest concentrations were observed when fed the HO diet. Plasma FFA levels did not differ among the controls and were higher in the fasted mink, with the highest levels observed in the fasted LFI CO group (Table 8). Higher TAG levels were noted in the fasted mink, with the exception of the mink fed the SO diet at the HFI. Additionally, the males had lower TAG levels than the females (0.94 ± 0.04 vs. 1.13 ± 0.04 mmol/L).

Table 7

Effect of feeding intensity, sex, and the herring oil, soya oil, and canola oil experimental diets on plasma LDL- and HDL-cholesterol levels

	Feeding intensity × diet interaction
	LFI			HFI
	Herring oil	Soya oil	Canola oil	Herring oil	Soya oil	Canola oil
HDL-Cholesterol, mmol/L	3.35 ± 0.12B	4.05 ± 0.12A	3.52 ± 0.12B	3.13 ± 0.12B	3.22 ± 0.12B	3.51 ± 0.12B
	Sex × diet interaction
	Male			Female
	Herring oil	Soya oil	Canola oil	Herring oil	Soya oil	Canola oil
LDL-Cholesterol, mmol/L	0.35 ± 0.04AB	0.34 ± 0.04B	0.44 ± 0.04A	0.44 ± 0.04A	0.39 ± 0.04AB	0.34 ± 0.04B
HDL-Cholesterol, mmol/L	2.97 ± 0.13D	3.27 ± 0.13CD	3.45 ± 0.13BC	3.51 ± 0.13BC	4.01 ± 0.13A	3.58 ± 0.13B

Values are lsmeans ± SEM. Labeled means with no common letters differ within the response variable (P ≤ 0.05). High-density lipoprotein, HDL; high feeding intensity, HFI; low-density lipoprotein, LDL; low feeding intensity, LFI.

Table 8

Effect of the herring oil, soya oil, and canola oil experimental diets, LFI and HFI, and fasting on mink plasma levels of FFA and TAG

		FFA, mmol/L		TAG, mmol/L
		Control	Fasted	Control	Fasted
Herring oil	LFI	0.50 ± 0.14*	1.32 ± 0.14ABC	0.94 ± 0.09AB*	1.31 ± 0.09A
	HFI	0.58 ± 0.14	0.95 ± 0.14C	0.89 ± 0.0AB*	1.34 ± 0.09A
Soya oil	LFI	0.44 ± 0.14*	0.96 ± 0.14C	0.72 ± 0.09B*	1.15 ± 0.09AB
	HFI	0.46 ± 0.14*	1.52 ± 0.14AB	1.06 ± 0.09A	1.02 ± 0.09B
Canola oil	LFI	0.60 ± 0.14*	1.63 ± 0.14A	0.76 ± 0.09B*	1.11 ± 0.09AB
	HFI	0.57 ± 0.14*	1.10 ± 0.14ABC	0.85 ± 0.09AB*	1.25 ± 0.09AB

Values are lsmeans ± SEM. Labeled means with no common letters differ within the response variable column, and means with *differ within the response variable row (P ≤ 0.05). Free fatty acids, FFA; high feeding intensity, HFI; low feeding intensity, LFI; triacylglycerols, TAG.

Insulin levels were lower in the males than females (4.32 ± 0.35 vs. 5.98 ± 0.35 μU/mL), the mink fed at the HFI had higher insulin levels than those fed at the LFI (5.67 ± 0.36 vs. 4.63 ± 0.36 μU/mL), and the concentrations correlated significantly with the body fat% (%BF; rp = 0.26, P = 0.028). Overall, the fasted mink had lower insulin levels (4.34 ± 0.36 vs. 5.95 ± 0.36 μU/mL). Leptin levels in the control mink were higher when fed at the HFI (3.41 ± 0.19 ng/mL) compared to the LFI (1.91 ± 0.19 ng/mL) and correlated with %BF (rp = 0.58, P = 0.001). In the fasted mink, leptin levels were lower than in the controls and did not differ between the FI groups (LFI: 1.25 ± 0.19, HFI: 1.36 ± 0.19 ng/mL). T3 tended to be higher in the mink fed at the HFI, correlated with %BF (rp = 0.60, P = 0.001), and was lower in the fasted mink (Table 9). T4 did not correlate with %BF (rp = 0.36, P = 0.77). T4 levels differed significantly depending on the FI of the HO mink (LFI: 10.2 ± 0.8, HFI: 13.1 ± 0.8 nmol/L) but there were no other significant differences within diets or FI (SO; LFI: 11.7 ± 0.8, HFI: 10.0 ± 0.8, CO; LFI: 11.8 ± 0.8, HFI: 10.6 ± 0.8 nmol/L).

Table 9

Effect of fasting and feeding intensity combined with the herring oil, soya oil, and canola oil experimental diets on T concentrations

		T 3 , nmol/L
		Fasting treatment		Feeding intensity
		Control	Fasted	LFI	HFI
Herring oil	Male	0.81 ± 0.05C*	0.65 ± 0.05C	0.65 ± 0.06B*	0.82 ± 0.06C
	Female	0.98 ± 0.05AB*	0.85 ± 0.06AB	0.73 ± 0.06AB*	1.10 ± 0.06A
Soya oil	Male	0.86 ± 0.05BC*	0.70 ± 0.05BC	0.65 ± 0.06B*	0.91 ± 0.06BC
	Female	1.07 ± 0.05A*	0.71 ± 0.06BC	0.85 ± 0.06A	0.94 ± 0.06BC
Canola oil	Male	0.83 ± 0.05C*	0.70 ± 0.05BC	0.69 ± 0.06B*	0.84 ± 0.06C
	Female	0.92 ± 0.05BC	0.93 ± 0.07A	0.78 ± 0.06AB*	1.07 ± 0.07AB

Values are lsmeans ± SEM. Labeled means with no common letters differ within the response variable column and means with *differ within the response variable row (P ≤ 0.05). High feeding intensity, HFI; low feeding intensity, LFI; triiodothyronine, T3.

Discussion

By modifying the FI, we created two distinct BW groups of lighter and heavier mink. Dietary fat source also influenced the BW of the mink, as observed previously by Käkelä et al. [18]. According to our results, the control males fed the HO diet were significantly heavier than the males fed the SO or CO diets. This difference was possibly caused by the increased feed intake in the HO males.

Fasting expectedly caused weight loss and it is known to result in the development of fatty liver in carnivores [3-5,25]. A 5% liver TAG threshold is used for the diagnosis of fatty liver in cats [26]. Using this threshold, the results of previous studies examining both hepatic TAG and total lipid levels in mink suggest that the corresponding total liver lipid level threshold for fatty liver in mink would be between 9 to 12% [3,18]. Based on this threshold range, the control mink appeared to have healthy hepatic lipid levels. With fasting, hepatic lipid levels increased, exceeding 12%, along with plasma ALT activities, an indicator of liver dysfunction [27]. Higher liver lipid values in the mink fed at the HFI compared to the LFI revealed the negative implications of excessive adiposity on liver health. The severity of the hepatic lipid accumulation in the mink fed at the HFI was lower when the mink were fed the HO diet compared to the SO and CO diets, suggesting that n-3 long-chain PUFA may help ameliorate or slow the development of fatty liver in over-conditioned mink. The HSI results were not in agreement with the liver lipid%, unlike in a previous study [3]. Caution is needed when using HSI, as in the current study it was possible for lean mink without fatty liver to have higher HSI values than heavier mink with fatty liver.

Fasting causes lipolysis in body fat depots releasing fatty acids, and the liver may increase its fatty acid uptake from the blood in proportion to their concentration in circulation [12]. Plasma FFA levels were not affected by dietary treatment in the controls. Similar to previous studies [3,5], the FFA and TAG levels increased with fasting and the FFA levels were higher in the mink with higher liver lipid levels, with the exception of the mink fed the HO diet at the LFI. These results reflect the rapid mobilization of the body fat reserves [3], and are also observed in clinical cases of feline hepatic lipidosis [28]. An exception to this was the mink fed the SO diet at the HFI, where the high dietary n-6:n-3 PUFA ratio may decrease the liver secretion of TAG [29], contributing to the increased liver lipid content in these mink. The decreased secretion may also explain the lack of response to fasting compared to the other groups.

Plasma LDL-cholesterol levels were lower in the fasted and HFI groups, differing from Mustonen et al. [5] where fasting did not have an effect. Ibrahim et al. [30] reported increased LDL-cholesterol levels in cats with diet-induced obesity. No clear explanations are apparent for these differences in LDL-cholesterol. Decreases in HDL-cholesterol in the fasted mink are in agreement with Mustonen et al. [5], and could be related to increased clearance by the liver [30]. Whether this is a result of fasting or a consequence of fatty liver is not known, and no changes were evident in clinical cases of feline hepatic lipidosis [28].

Insulin resistance and hyperglycemia are associated with fatty liver, with the development of the two being able to further worsen each other [10]. Monthly blood glucose concentrations were within the normal range for mink [31], which differs from a previous study where high FI was associated with hyperglycemia [9]. The final plasma glucose values were elevated slightly in the control mink, but the results are difficult to interpret as handling stress and ketamine can also increase the blood glucose levels [32]. In the fasting model, mink maintain normoglycemia [5], and do not develop the severe derangement of glucose regulation that can be observed in nursing sickness in mink [33] and in feline hepatic lipidosis [28]. Insulin concentrations were not elevated either, and decreased during fasting, helping to spare glucose and increase fat mobilization [3,24]. Although the mink appear to have remained normoglycemic throughout the study, the positive correlation between insulin and %BF suggests that long-term monitoring of blood glucose concentrations may be interesting as there is evidence for impaired glycemic control in over-conditioned mink [9].

Under normal physiological conditions, plasma leptin levels in mink increase with increasing BW [34], and decrease during fasting [3,24]. This relationship between body fat and leptin levels was maintained in the control mink. However, the effect of body condition on leptin levels was not present in the fasted mink, with similar levels in the LFI and HFI groups, indicating that fasting has a stronger influence on leptin levels than adiposity. Although higher leptin levels are observed in clinical cases of feline hepatic lipidosis [28], they are likely to be related to increased adiposity. Regarding the T3 concentrations, a clear decrease was observed in the fasted mink. This was documented also previously [24] and probably represents an adaptation of energy saving.

The balance of lipid delivery and metabolism in the liver contributes to the net hepatic lipid accumulation. Obesity may aggravate the problem by increasing the amount of fat available for mobilization. Dietary fat may also influence lipid metabolism in the liver, with long-chain n-3 PUFA promoting hepatic lipid excretion and oxidation [29]. Ahlstrøm and Skrede [35] found a positive effect of fish oil, high in long-chain n-3 PUFA, on hepatic metabolism, with dietary levels correlating positively to liver peroxisomal β-oxidation activity. During periods of hepatic lipid accumulation, it would be beneficial to be able to increase fatty acid oxidation within the liver. This may help to explain why within the over-conditioned HFI group, the mink fed the HO diet had the lowest liver lipid levels. In addition, the beneficial role of HO could potentially be attributed to the higher levels of long-chain monounsaturated fatty acids, also shown to increase oxidative capacity of liver and muscle [36]. A longer-term controlled feeding experiment, accounting for the seasonal fluctuations in body condition, with a larger number of mink per sub-treatment, would be necessary to confirm the potential beneficial effects of dietary long-chain n-3 PUFA on liver health.

Despite the significant hepatic lipid accumulation as a result of fasting, the mink appeared alert and healthy. It remains unknown what can cause the relatively benign lipid accumulation to progress rapidly to the life-threatening stage in hypercarnivores, such as mink and cats [1,6]. Currently there are also no specific pharmaceutical therapies available. It is therefore evident that preventing the over-feeding and rapid slimming of mink throughout the year may help maintain liver health. It is noteworthy that the current RDA guidelines, used in this study [21], may exceed the mink’s energy requirements leading to obesity. The HFI mink consumed just over 100% RDA of what was offered but were still over-conditioned.

To conclude, by feeding the mink different dietary fat sources at the LFI and HFI we were able to examine the effects of FI and fatty acid nutrition on the development of fasting-induced fatty liver. FI had no effect on the hepatic lipid content of the control mink, whereas fasting caused the development of fatty liver in the mink with increasing severity in those fed at the HFI. Preventing over-conditioning and increasing dietary intake of long-chain n-3 PUFA were found to be beneficial in decreasing the severity of lipid accumulation.

Abbreviations

ALT: Alanine transaminase; AKPH: Alkaline phosphatase; %BF: Body fat%; BW: Body weight; CO: Canola oil; FI: Feeding intensity; FFA: Free fatty acid; HSI: Hepato-somatic index; HO: Herring oil; HDL: High-density lipoprotein; HFI: High feeding intensity; LDL: Low-density lipoprotein; LFI: Low feeding intensity; PUFA: Polyunsaturated fatty acid; RDA: Recommended dietary allowance; SO: Soya oil; T4: Thyroxine; TAG: Triacylglycerols; T3: Triiodothyronine.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

MFD, A-MM, PN, KR-W designed the research. MFD, JH, SL, A-MM, PN, KR-W conducted research. MFD analyzed data and led the writing of the paper. MFD and KR-W share primary responsibility for final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Additional file 1

P-values of the main effects and interactions for mink body weights, feed intake, and blood glucose during the feeding trial from September to November.

Click here for file

Additional file 2

P-values of the main effects and interactions for final body weight and liver responses.

Click here for file

Additional file 3

P-values of the main effects and interactions for the mink clinical chemistry and endocrinological responses.

Click here for file