Literature DB >> 24438049

Impact of geographic location on surgical outcomes of women with breast cancer.

Jonathan Azzopardi1, David Walsh, Chilton Chong, Corey Taylor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to use the Breast Surgeons of Australia and New Zealand Quality Audit to evaluate the diagnostic work up and surgical treatment path for Australian women with early breast cancer in relation to geographic location.
METHODS: We accessed data on patient geographic demographics, diagnostic and surgical procedures and cancer characteristics in 115,872 episodes of early breast cancer reported to the Quality Audit between 1998 and 2012. Tumour size, grade and number, lymph node positivity and lymphovascular invasion are the major prognostic factors adjusted for.
RESULTS: Core biopsy is the most frequently performed diagnostic method and open biopsy the least (P=0.001). Remote locations have the highest proportion of open biopsies and cities the lowest (13.8 versus 9.8%, P=0.001). The outer regional/remote patient group has a higher likelihood of an open biopsy than city patients (odds ratio 1.5; 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.2 P=0.02). Reconstruction rates are low throughout ranging from 3 to 4% (P=0.001). Cities have the highest proportion of no surgery (1.5%, P=0.001). Cities have the highest proportion of breast conserving surgery and the remote the lowest (64.5% versus 29.9%, P=0.001). Outer regional locations have the highest proportion of mastectomies and cities the lowest (38 versus 29.9%, P=0.001). The likelihood of receiving radiotherapy is associated with geographic location of residence and geographic distribution of the radiotherapy facility (P=0.002, P=0.001).
CONCLUSION: Geographic location of residence is associated with the diagnostic work up and surgical treatment of Australian women with early breast cancer.
© 2014 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; diagnostic method; geographic location; outcome; surgical treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24438049     DOI: 10.1111/ans.12514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  10 in total

Review 1.  Making decisions about breast reconstruction: A systematic review of patient-reported factors influencing choice.

Authors:  Kathy Flitcroft; Meagan Brennan; Andrew Spillane
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Trends in surgery and adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: a population-based study in Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  Philippa Youl; Shoni Philpot; Julie Moore; Michelle Morris; David E Theile
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Influencers of Immediate Postmastectomy Reconstruction: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

Authors:  Dora Danko; Yuan Liu; Feifei Geng; Theresa W Gillespie
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.283

4.  Quantifying the hospital and emergency department costs for women diagnosed with breast cancer in Queensland.

Authors:  Daniel Lindsay; Nicole Bates; Abbey Diaz; Kerrianne Watt; Emily Callander
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Achieving High Breast Cancer Survival for Women in Rural and Remote Areas.

Authors:  Albert Hoang Nguyen Ho-Huynh; Timothy J Elston; Ronny K Gunnarsson; Alan De Costa
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2022-01-01

6.  Variations in outcomes by residential location for women with breast cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paramita Dasgupta; Peter D Baade; Danny R Youlden; Gail Garvey; Joanne F Aitken; Isabella Wallington; Jennifer Chynoweth; Helen Zorbas; Philippa H Youl
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-29       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Patterns of immediate breast reconstruction in New South Wales, Australia: a population-based study.

Authors:  Yingyu Feng; Kathy Flitcroft; Marina T van Leeuwen; Adam G Elshaug; Andrew Spillane; Sallie-Anne Pearson
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 1.872

8.  Geographical Inequalities in Surgical Treatment for Localized Female Breast Cancer, Queensland, Australia 1997-2011: Improvements over Time but Inequalities Remain.

Authors:  Peter D Baade; Paramita Dasgupta; Philippa H Youl; Christopher Pyke; Joanne F Aitken
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Reoperation after breast-conserving surgery for cancer in Australia: statewide cohort study of linked hospital data.

Authors:  Marina T van Leeuwen; Michael O Falster; Claire M Vajdic; Philip J Crowe; Sanja Lujic; Elizabeth Klaes; Louisa Jorm; Art Sedrakyan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Regional variation in immediate breast reconstruction in Australia.

Authors:  K L Flitcroft; M E Brennan; D S J Costa; A J Spillane
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2017-10-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.