Literature DB >> 24437776

The accuracy of a voice vote.

Ingo R Titze1, Anil Palaparthi1.   

Abstract

The accuracy of a voice vote was addressed by systematically varying group size, individual voter loudness, and words that are typically used to express agreement or disagreement. Five judges rated the loudness of two competing groups in A-B comparison tasks. Acoustic analysis was performed to determine the sound energy level of each word uttered by each group. Results showed that individual voter differences in energy level can grossly alter group loudness and bias the vote. Unless some control is imposed on the sound level of individual voters, it is difficult to establish even a two-thirds majority, much less a simple majority. There is no symmetry in the bias created by unequal sound production of individuals. Soft voices do not bias the group loudness much, but loud voices do. The phonetic balance of the two words chosen (e.g., "yea" and "nay" as opposed to "aye" and "no") seems to be less of an issue.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24437776      PMCID: PMC3985892          DOI: 10.1121/1.4837236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Fourier descriptor analysis and unification of voice range profile contours: method and applications.

Authors:  Peter Pabon; Sten Ternström; Anick Lamarche
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Synergistic modes of vocal tract articulation for American English vowels.

Authors:  Brad H Story
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Behavioral discrimination of click intensity in cat.

Authors:  J C Saunders
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Sequential effects in judgments of loudness.

Authors:  W Jesteadt; R D Luce; D M Green
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Dynamic intensity variations of individual choral singers.

Authors:  R F Coleman
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Electrophysiological and acoustic correlates of stress and stress perception.

Authors:  I Fónagy
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1966-06

7.  Auditory intensity discrimination in the chinchilla.

Authors:  S S Saunders; B G Shivapuja; R J Salvi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 1.840

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Individualized Patient Vocal Priorities for Tailored Therapy.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; Tobias Riede; Anil Palaparthi; Linda S Hynan; Amy Hamilton; Laura Toles; Ted Mau
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.297

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.