Environmentally persistent free radicals (EPFRs) are formed by the chemisorption of substituted aromatics on metal oxide surfaces in both combustion sources and superfund sites. The current study reports the dependency of EPFR yields and their persistency on metal loading in particles (0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, and 5% CuO/silica). The EPFRs were generated through exposure of particles to three adsorbate vapors at 230 °C: phenol, 2-monochlorophenol (2-MCP), and dichlorobenzene (DCBz). Adsorption resulted in the formation of surface-bound phenoxyl- and semiquinoine-type radicals with characteristic EPR spectra displaying a g value ranging from ∼ 2.0037 to 2.006. The highest EPFR yield was observed for CuO concentrations between 1 and 3% in relation to MCP and phenol adsorption. However, radical density, which is expressed as the number of radicals per copper atom, was highest at 0.75-1% CuO loading. For 1,2-dichlorobenzene adsorption, radical concentration increased linearly with decreasing copper content. At the same time, a qualitative change in the radicals formed was observed--from semiquinone to chlorophenoxyl radicals. The two longest lifetimes, 25 and 23 h, were observed for phenoxyl-type radicals on 0.5% CuO and chlorophenoxyl-type radicals on 0.75% CuO, respectively.
Environmentally persistent free radicals (EPFRs) are formed by the chemisorption of substituted aromatics on metal oxide surfaces in both combustion sources and superfund sites. The current study reports the dependency of EPFR yields and their persistency on metal loading in particles (0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, and 5% CuO/silica). The EPFRs were generated through exposure of particles to three adsorbate vapors at 230 °C: phenol, 2-monochlorophenol (2-MCP), and dichlorobenzene (DCBz). Adsorption resulted in the formation of surface-bound phenoxyl- and semiquinoine-type radicals with characteristic EPR spectra displaying a g value ranging from ∼ 2.0037 to 2.006. The highest EPFR yield was observed for CuO concentrations between 1 and 3% in relation to MCP and phenol adsorption. However, radical density, which is expressed as the number of radicals per copper atom, was highest at 0.75-1% CuO loading. For 1,2-dichlorobenzene adsorption, radical concentration increased linearly with decreasing copper content. At the same time, a qualitative change in the radicals formed was observed--from semiquinone to chlorophenoxyl radicals. The two longest lifetimes, 25 and 23 h, were observed for phenoxyl-type radicals on 0.5% CuO and chlorophenoxyl-type radicals on 0.75% CuO, respectively.
There is overwhelming evidence from animal
experimental models,
cell culture experiments, and cell free systems that exposure to particulate
matter (PM) causes oxidative stress (OS)[1,2] leading to
acute and chronic diseases.[3−6] OS results from excessive generation of reactive
oxygen species (ROS) such as hydroxyl and superoxide radicals[7,8] under physiological conditions. Although a plethora of studies exist
on the mortality and morbidity of PM, the components that are responsible
for its toxicity and the observed adverse effects remain a quagmire.[9−11] However, many researchers agree that the level of PM toxicity depends
on the chemical composition,[12] particle
size,[13] and shape.[14,15] Recently, we reported that the presence of EPFRs on particulate
matter reduces molecular O2 to superoxide followed by dismutation
in aprotic media to form hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radicals.[16,17] EPFRs on PM are formed through interaction of transition metal oxides
(such iron, copper, zinc, and nickel) with aromatic compounds via
surface mediated processes.[18−21] This results in the formation of surface-bound radical
species which are stable enough to persist in the atmospheric environment
for days, and which are also reactive in aquatic media to produce
ROS.The concentration of metals in particulate matter may vary
greatly.
In fine particulate matter (aerodynamic diameter <2.5 μm,
PM2.5), 1–5 × 103, 0.1–0.3, ∼2.0,
and 0.5–20 × 103 μg/g of Fe, Ni, Cu,
and Zn, respectively, have been reported.[22−25] The analysis and characterization
of transition metals from combustion systems and municipal incinerators
reveals 2.35% iron(III) oxide and 0.05% copper oxide.[26,27] Previous studies of EPFRs that used the same concentration of metals
(5% by weight as oxide) in particulates indicated that almost every
transition metal that was under study yielded EPFRs on particle surfaces.[28−31] The large distribution of metal concentration in particulate matter
raises the question of how the metal concentration affects yield,
lifetime, and chemical reactivity of the EPFRs. One can anticipate
that changing the concentration of metal in particulates will affect
the metal oxide cluster size and its reactivity. In fact, the size
of metal/metal oxide clusters has been reported to be a pivotal property
in the catalytic activity.[32−37] Changing catalytic properties may affect the propensity of the metal
oxides to form EPFRs, hence contributing to the different chemical
behavior of EPFRs. In this study, we are attempting to answer the
above question by using different concentrations of copper oxide nanoclusters.
Silica (Cabosil) based synthetic particulates containing varying concentrations
of CuO (0.25–5% by weight) were tested for EPFRs’ yield
and persistence.
Experimental Section
Particle Synthesis
Cabosil from Cabot (EH-5, 99+%,
88 m2/g BET surface area) was impregnated with a 0.1 M
solution of Cu(NO3)2·2.5H2O
to obtain particles with different copper oxide concentrations: 0.25,
0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, and 5 wt %. Samples were left to adsorb copper
nitrate for 24 h at room temperature and then dried in the air at
120 °C for 12 h before calcination in the air at 450 °C
for 5 h to form Cu(II)O.
EPFR Formation
The adsorbate chemicals,
phenol (PH,
Aldrich, 99+%), 2-monochlorophenol (2-MCP, Aldrich, 99+%), and 1,2-dichlorobenzene
(1,2-DCBz, Sigma-Aldrich, 99% HPLC grade) were used as received without
further purification.EPFRs were formed by exposing CuO/silica
particles to precursor vapors: phenol, 2-MCP, 1,2-DCBz. Prior to the
precursor’s exposure, the particles were heated in
situ in the air at 450 °C for 1 h to remove organics
on the surface. In addition, these particles were exposed to the selected
precursor vapors at 230 °C using a custom-made vacuum exposure
chamber for 5 min under vapor pressure conditions. After exposure,
samples were evacuated for 1 h to remove excess nonchemisorbed adsorbate
(20) at 10–2 Torr. The dosed particles were cooled
under vacuum conditions to room temperature before EPR spectra were
recorded. Each experiment was repeated 3×, and the results were
reproducible within radical deviation of <5%.
EPR Analysis
EPR spectra were recorded in a Suprasil
EPR tube at room temperature using a computer-controlled Bruker EMX
10/2.7 EPR spectrometer. Instrument parameters were as follows: center
field, 3470 G; sweep width, 100 G; microwave frequency, 9.7 GHz; microwave
power, 2.0 mW; modulation frequency, 4.0 G; modulation amplitude,
4.0 G; receiver gain, 3.54 × 104; time constant, 41.0
ms; and three scans. Radical concentration was calculated using the
DPPH standard due to the similarity between the spectral profiles
of DPPH and the radicals formed on CuO/silica.
Lifetime Analysis
The kinetic studies were performed
to determine the persistency and stability of the radicals in the
air. The samples were exposed to ambient air and EPR spectra obtained
regularly to determine the concentration of radicals as a function
of time until the sample had decayed and acquisition of the EPR spectra
was at the noise level of the instrument. The 1/e lifetimes (t1/) of
EPFRs were evaluated using the following mathematical expression for
the first-order decay:Rate constant k was found
from the slope of the correlation between logarithm of radical concentration
change (R/R0) vs time,
and 1/e lifetime was calculated.
Results and Discussion
Adsorption of aromatic precursors on
CuO supported on silica resulted in the appearance of an EPR signal
centered at ∼3400 G with a narrow line width ΔHp-p ∼ 5–7 G for phenol
and 2-MCP, and a broader line width ΔHp-p ∼ 8–16 G of 1,2-DCBz. Table 1 displays the spectral parameters of each adsorbate.
These paramagnetic signals arise due to the interaction between the
hydroxyl- and chlorine-substituted molecules with a metal oxide surface.
The general mechanism of EPFR formation has been established and confirmed
by our previous studies of copper, iron, nickel, zinc oxides, titania,
and alumina.[20,29,31,38] The molecular precursors react with the
surface-hydroxyl groups and chemisorbs via elimination of H2O/HCl, resulting in a surface-bound EPFR. This interaction result
in a 1-electron transfer to the metal cation center and a surface-stabilized
radical. The general scheme for the reaction is presented for 2-MCP
at Cu2+ sites on Cu(II)O/silica particle surface (cf. Scheme 1).
Table 1
Spectral Characteristics
of EPFRs
Formed on Different CuO Loading on Silica Matrix from Different Adsorbates
at 230 °C
g value
ΔHp-p
%
CuO
2-MCP
1,2-DCBz
PH
2-MCP
1,2-DCBz
PH
5
2.0042
2.0060
2.0039
6.7
16.0
5.2
3
2.0044
2.0057
2.0039
6.9
15.9
4.8
2
2.0039
2.0053
2.0039
5.5
15.3
5.4
1
2.0038
2.0050
2.0037
5.3
15.2
5.3
0.75
2.0040
2.0051
2.0039
5.6
14.2
5.2
0.5
2.0040
2.0048
2.0040
6.1
7.4
5.4
0.25
2.0040
2.0050
2.0038
6.0
7.7
4.6
Scheme 1
General Mechanism
of EPFR Formation from 2-Monochlorophenol at Cu2+ Sites
on a CuO/Silica Particle
Radical Speciation
The precursor–metal oxide
interaction may result in more than one type of EPFR depending on
the number and position of the substituent in the aromatic precursor[20] with the overall EPR spectrum being a superposition
of those species.[28−31] Deconvolution of the complex EPFRs’ spectra facilitated the
identification of three paramagnetic species, namely, F-center, superimposed
at 1.9970–2.0020, g2 (attributed to phenoxylradicals) superimposed
at 2.0035–2.0040, and g3 (attributed to semiquinoneradicals)
superimposed at <2.0050.[29,31] Depending on the relative
concentration of g2 and g3 types of radicals, an overall shift of g value of the EPR signal is observed. In the current study,
the overall g values for the EPFR species for phenol
and 2-MCP were similar (∼2.0037–2.0044) with a shift
toward the lower g values for phenol (cf. Figure 1). For phenol adsorption, the resultant radical
signals did not change either the position or the line width with
respect to concentration of copper oxide on silica (cf. Figures 1 and 2, Table 1). Thus, it is evident that no change of radical speciation
occurred with decreasing CuO content. On the basis of the spectral
parameters from previous studies of silica supported with 5% CuO,
Fe2O3, and NiO, together with the current results,
it can be concluded that a phenoxyl-type radical is formed on the
surface of all copper concentrations[20,29,31,39]
Figure 1
Overall g value of radical signal with changing
CuO content in particles.
Figure 2
Change of ΔHp-p of EPR
spectra with changing CuO content.
Overall g value of radical signal with changing
CuO content in particles.Change of ΔHp-p of EPR
spectra with changing CuO content.For the adsorption of 2-MCP, the overall g value
of spectra for all CuO concentrations changed only slightly with copper
content and is within the range of 2.0038–2.0044. On the basis
of the above finding, we conclude that the majority of radicals are
of the chlorophenoxyl type.[18] On the other
hand, the overall peak width, ΔHp-p, was larger on average by 1 gauss for the radical species, resulting
from adsorption of 2-MCP compared with phenol adsorption (cf. Table 1) at higher CuO concentrations. This indicates the
contribution of another radical species in the spectrum of 2-MCP exposed
samples, and it is believed to originate from semiquinone-type radicals
that are formed by the interaction between chlorine and hydroxyl groups
with the surface (cf. Scheme 1). This is similar
to the results obtained from other metal oxides.[20,29,31,40] Interestingly,
unlike in the case of phenol, the peak width broadens with an increase
in g value (vide infra).1,2-Dichlorobenzene
chemisorption on copper oxide-containing particles
resulted in highly asymmetric EPR spectra and higher g values (>2.0048) and larger line width (∼7.7–16
G)
than those resulting from the adsorption of phenol and 2-MCP (cf.
Figures 1 and 2 and
Table 1). A high contribution of the o-semiquinone radicals to the overall spectrum is anticipated
for 1,2-DCBz as it had been observed in other metals. Indeed, 1,2-DCBz
adsorption has been reported to proceed with simultaneous displacement
of both chlorine atoms, resulting in the formation of predominantly o-semiquinone radicals.[41] However,
a distinct spectral change can be seen with decreasing copper content
(cf. Figure 3) when the overall g values of the spectra are decreasing (cf. Figure 1). Observed dramatic spectral changes result from changing
speciation of the formed radicals from predominantly semiquinone species
to a more balanced ratio of chlorophenoxyl to o-semiquinoneradicals or even predominantly chlorophenoxyl species for 0.25 and
0.5% CuO. Decreasing spectral width also supports this conclusion
(cf. Figure 2). For 0.5% CuO, adsorption of
1,2-dichlorobenzene produces a spectrum that resembles more the spectrum
that results from adsorption of 2-monochlorophenol than the one that
results from higher concentrations of CuO exposed to 1,2-dichlorobenzene
(cf. Figure 3).
Figure 3
EPR spectra from the
adsorption of 1,2-dichlorobenzene and 2-monochlorophenol
on the particles containing different copper oxide concentrations.
EPR spectra from the
adsorption of 1,2-dichlorobenzene and 2-monochlorophenol
on the particles containing different copper oxide concentrations.
Surface Radical Density
The surface concentration of
radicals formed upon the adsorption of precursors on CuO/silica samples
depends on the concentration of copper oxide (cf. Figures 4 and 5). In general, the
adsorption of 2-MCP resulted in the highest concentration of radicals
on the surface, with the maximum yield at ∼1% CuO content.
Above that concentration, the yield drops rapidly (cf. Figure 5). Chemisorption of 2-MCP occurs 11 times faster
than that of a DCBz.[41] This is expected
since chemisorption of 2-MCP requires scission of the phenolic O–H
bond, which has a bond dissociation energy of 82 kcal/mol[42] compared with 97 kcal/mol for the C–Cl
bond dissociation in 1,2-DCBz.[43]
Figure 4
Dependence of EPFR density with metal concentration dosed
with
1,2-Dichlorobenzene, 2-monochlorophenol, and phenol on various CuO
loadings on silica.
Figure 5
Concentrations of organic
EPFR adsorbed at 230 °C for different
CuO contents based on a sample mass basis.
Since only copper sites are active in the formation of radicals,
a linear correlation between the radical yield and copper content
should be expected. However, as presented in Figure 4, this is not the case. Data presented in Figure 4 have been fitted to exponential decrease expression
(solid lines). An exponential decrease in radical density per copper
atom was observed between 1% and 5% CuO content for 2-MCP adsorption,
with radical density drop-off below 1%. For copper oxide content below
1%, an exponential increase of radical concentration described the
observed trend the best, as marked by the dotted line in Figure 4. At the maximum observed radical concentration,
one radical is formed for every ∼two copper atoms in the samples.
One can imagine that once an adsorbed radical occupies a copper site,
the surface access to neighboring sites is hindered. Thus, we can
assume a complete saturation of the surface sites with adsorbates
for 1% CuO. The 1:2 ratio of EPFRs to copper (for 1% CuO loading)
is an indication that all copper atoms are surface available in this
case. Up to 1% CuO content CuO clusters are two-dimensional with all
copper atoms to be surface available. Increasing CuO content above
1% results in three-dimentional growths of the clusters and entrapment
of some of the copper atoms inside the clusters. We speculate that
this is the main reason for the radical yield drop for CuO content
above 1%, while the ratio of radicals to surface copper atoms (radical
density) remains unchanged. Below 1% CuO content, a drop of radical
density from the 2-MCP precursor can be observed (cf. Figure 4). We speculate that all copper sites are surface
available at the 1% CuO content, and a further decrease in copperoxide concentration results in even smaller CuO clusters limiting
the number of adsorbed species due to steric effects. At 1% CuO loading,
for every 10 copper atoms, four are associated with radicals (cf.
Figure 4). Assuming the decrease of cluster
size with decreasing CuO content, below 1% of CuO, the clusters become
smaller, limiting the number of adsorbed species (for example, a nine
Cu atom flat CuO cluster could fit only three radicals—a 0.3
coverage ratio etc.). At present, we consider steric effects as a
major cause of the radical yield decrease below 1% CuO content; however,
electronic effects such as a lack of stabilization of reduced copper
cannot be ruled out.Dependence of EPFR density with metal concentration dosed
with
1,2-Dichlorobenzene, 2-monochlorophenol, and phenol on various CuO
loadings on silica.Concentrations of organic
EPFR adsorbed at 230 °C for different
CuO contents based on a sample mass basis.Phenol adsorption over CuO-containing particles resulted
in both
lower EPFR yield and lower radical density, when compared with 2-monochlorophenol
(cf. Figures 4 and 5). In this case, a maximum yield of radicals is detected between
2 and 3% CuO content. The differences in the radical yield of 2-monochlorophenol
and phenol result from the effect of the ortho group
substituent,[29,31] ortho-substituted aromatics being
more reactive. Thus, the surface radical density increases exponentially
with decreasing copper oxide content. An increase in radical density
below 1% copper oxide content indicates a higher reactivity of small
clusters.The same conclusion is supported by an exponential
decrease in
radical density with increasing copper oxide content after 1,2-dichlorobenzene
adsorption (cf. Figure 4). As discussed earlier,
by decreasing the copper oxide content, radical species are gradually
changing from bidentate semiquinone to monodentate phenoxyl radicals.
This results in a “more closely” packed species on the
surface. Indeed, the adsorption of 1,2-dichlorobenzene is the only
case where a small linear increase of EPFR yield is detected with
decreasing copper oxide content (cf. Figure 5).
EPFRs Persistency
One of the most important characteristics
of EPFRs from an environmental perspective is their persistency in
the environment. EPFRs have been reported to have a much longer lifetime
compared with other radicals such as acyl,hydroxyl, or superoxide,[44,45] which makes them environmentally hazardous when emitted from combustion
sources. As previously mentioned, particulate matter may contain a
varying concentration of metal oxides; therefore decay times have
to be evaluated relative to the metal concentration. The EPFR 1/e lifetime in ambient air which is associated with CuO is
depicted in Figure 6. It is evident that by
decreasing the copper oxide content, EPFRs 1/e lifetimes
increase to the maximum value at ∼0.5–0.75% CuO. Interestingly,
for 1,2-dichlorobenzene and 2-monochlorophenol precursors, their observed
maximum 1/e lifetimes are very similar (22–23
h), indicating again similar species dominating the surface at CuO
content–chlorophenoxyl species. At higher copper oxide contents,
a difference between 1/e lifetimes of those two samples
is notable. This is in line with the previous studies that demonstrated
longer lifetimes of phenoxyl compared with a semiquinone-type radical.
It is also worth it to note that small clusters do not stabilize radicals
as efficiently as indicated by the drop in the lifetime of EPFRs below
0.5% concentration. A word of caution is therefore necessary: −0.5%
CuO should not be taken as a limit for the highest stability of radicals
in environmental samples. In real life, a cluster size distribution
may not correlate with the concentration as in the case of those synthetic
samples.
Figure 6
EFPRs 1/e lifetimes in ambient air at room temperature
formed on different CuO loadings on silica at 230 °C.
EFPRs 1/e lifetimes in ambient air at room temperature
formed on different CuO loadings on silica at 230 °C.In summary, our results indicate that the reactivity
of aromatic
compounds on particulates is dependent on the concentrations of CuO.
The result of the interaction with the surfaces produces EPFRs that
are stable and persist for hours. Though we could not prove it directly,
it is inferred that the differences in reactivity result from different
cluster sizes of copper oxide affecting concentration, persistency,
and speciation of EPFRs. The smaller the size of the nanoclusters,
the higher is the ability to catalyze EPFRs’ formation/stabilization.
Changing the persistency of EPFRs with different CuO concentrations
is only partially correlated with changing radical speciation and
indicates the role of cluster size in radical stabilization. The consequence
of the higher stability of EPFRs on smaller clusters is transport
to long distances from the source. Another potential implication of
the presented studies is the potential of engineered nanomaterials
in consumer products to amplify EPFRs production.
Authors: Matthew C Patterson; Nathan D Keilbart; Lucy W Kiruri; Chad A Thibodeaux; Slawo Lomnicki; Richard L Kurtz; E D Poliakoff; Barry Dellinger; Phillip T Sprunger Journal: Chem Phys Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 2.348
Authors: Theo M de Kok; Janneke G Hogervorst; Jacco J Briedé; Marcel H van Herwijnen; Lou M Maas; Edwin J Moonen; Hermen A Driece; Jos C Kleinjans Journal: Environ Mol Mutagen Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 3.216
Authors: Michelle L Bell; Keita Ebisu; Roger D Peng; Jonathan M Samet; Francesca Dominici Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-03-19 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Roger D Peng; Michelle L Bell; Alison S Geyh; Aidan McDermott; Scott L Zeger; Jonathan M Samet; Francesca Dominici Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2009-02-11 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: G Leendert Bezemer; Johannes H Bitter; Herman P C E Kuipers; Heiko Oosterbeek; Johannes E Holewijn; Xiaoding Xu; Freek Kapteijn; A Jos van Dillen; Krijn P de Jong Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2006-03-29 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Peggy A O'Day; Ajith Pattammattel; Paul Aronstein; Valerie J Leppert; Henry Jay Forman Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 11.357
Authors: N I Sakr; Orhan Kizilkaya; Sierra F Carlson; Simon Chan; Reuben A Oumnov; Jaqueline Catano; Richard L Kurtz; Randall W Hall; E D Poliakoff; Phillip T Sprunger Journal: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces Date: 2021-10-04 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Chad A Thibodeaux; E D Poliakoff; Orhan Kizilkaya; Matthew C Patterson; Mark F DiTusa; Richard L Kurtz; P T Sprunger Journal: Chem Phys Lett Date: 2015-10-01 Impact factor: 2.328
Authors: Ugwumsinachi G Nwosu; Amitava Roy; Albert Leo N dela Cruz; Barry Dellinger; Robert Cook Journal: Environ Sci Process Impacts Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 4.238
Authors: Ugwumsinachi G Nwosu; Lavrent Khachatryan; Sang Gil Youm; Amitava Roy; Albert Leo N Dela Cruz; Evgueni E Nesterov; Barry Dellinger; Robert L Cook Journal: RSC Adv Date: 2016-04-28 Impact factor: 3.361