| Literature DB >> 24436871 |
D Purmessur1, M C Cornejo1, S K Cho1, A C Hecht1, J C Iatridis1.
Abstract
An understanding of the processes that occur during development of the intervertebral disk can help inform therapeutic strategies for discogenic pain. This article reviews the literature to identify candidates that are found in or derived from the notochord or notochordal cells and evaluates the theory that such factors could be isolated and used as biologics to target the structural disruption, inflammation, and neurovascular ingrowth often associated with discogenic back pain. A systematic review using PubMed was performed with a primary search using keywords "(notochordal OR notochord) And (nerves OR blood vessels OR SHH OR chondroitin sulfate OR notch OR CTGF) NOT chordoma." Secondary searches involved keywords associated with the intervertebral disk and pain. Several potential therapeutic candidates from the notochord and their possible targets were identified. Studies are needed to further identify candidates, explore mechanisms for effect, and to validate the theory that these candidates can promote structural restoration and limit or inhibit neurovascular ingrowth using in vivo studies.Entities:
Keywords: CTGF; Notch; Semaphorin 3A; chondroitin sulfate; intervertebral; notochord; notochordal cells; sonic hedgehog
Year: 2013 PMID: 24436871 PMCID: PMC3854597 DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1350053
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Global Spine J ISSN: 2192-5682
Fig. 1Schematic of primary and secondary systematic searches used to identify key publications with PubMed as the principal search engine. A primary search of “(notochordal OR notochord) And (nerves OR blood vessels OR SHH OR chondroitin sulfate OR notch OR CTGF) NOT chordoma” identified 390 articles. Of these publications, 37 were considered relevant to the review and were written in the English language. Secondary searches were performed to ensure key areas were not excluded, yielding 49 addition publications.
Notochordal therapeutic candidates and targets associated with IDD
| Candidates | Targets | References for identification of targets |
|---|---|---|
| Structure-modifying factors | ||
| Notochordal cell conditioned media and notochordal cells | Degenerate SNPCs and MSCs | Gantenbein-Ritter and Chan 2012, |
| Matricellular proteins (CTGF/Tenascin/Clusterin) | Degenerate SNPCs and MSCs | Purmessur et al 2011, |
| Hedgehog family | Degenerate SNPCs and MSCs | Bruggeman et al 2012, |
| TGFβ family (TGFβ/BMP/Nodal/Activin) | Degenerate SNPCs and MSCs | Abbott et al 2012, |
| FGF family | Degenerate SNPCs and MSCs | Winzi et al 2011, |
| Wnt/β-catenin pathway | Degenerate SNPCs and MSCs | Smolders et al 2013, |
| Notch pathway | Degenerate SNPCs and MSCs | Yamamoto et al 2010, |
| Transcription factors (T, Foxa1/2, Noto, SOX5/6, and Jun) | Degenerate SNPCs and MSCs | Harrelson et al 2012, |
| Symptom-modifying factors | ||
| Notochordal cell conditioned media and notochordal cells | Nerves | Larsson et al 2012, |
| Degenerate AF cells, SNPCs and MSCs | Kim et al 2012, | |
| Semaphorin 3E | Blood vessels | Meadows et al 2012 |
| Semaphorin 3A | Nerves | Tolofari et al 2010, |
| Noggin | Blood vessels | Bressan et al 2009, |
| Chordin | Blood vessels | Garriock et al 2010, |
| Proteoglycans and GAGs (aggrecan, decorin) and (chondroitin sulfate, dermatan sulfate) | Nerves | Conrad et al 2010, |
| Blood vessels | Johnson et al 2005 | |
Abbreviations: AF, annulus fibrosus; BMP, bone morphogenetic protein; CTGF, connective tissue growth factor; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; GAG, glycosaminoglycan; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; SNPC, small nucleus pulposus cell; TGFβ, transforming growth factor-β; Wnt, wingless-int.
Fig. 2Stages of spine development through maturation and disease. (1) Assembly with the somites alongside the notochord with the sclerotome (orange/pink) situated toward the notochord. (2) Condensation of the sclerotome giving rise to regions of the future intervertebral disk (IVD; orange) and vertebral bodies (VB; pink). (3) Involution of the notochord that expands in the regions of the future IVDs to produce the notochordal cell (NC)-rich nucleus pulposus (NP) and the organized annulus fibrosus (AF) (4). The young NP is highly gelatinous and cellular with large vacuolated NCs. There is distinct demarcation between the NP and AF. (5) The mature IVD transitions with a more fibrous NP region with increased extracellular matrix and decreased cellularity; small nucleus pulposus cells are the predominant cell type in the NP. (6) The degenerate IVD is characterized by a loss of demarcation between the NP and AF, loss in cellularity, structural fissures (white), which provide a path for neurovascular ingrowth (red and brown lines). This figure and concepts are modified from Smith et al,33 Stemple,1 and Fleming et al.32
Fig. 3(A) Stitched image of the sagittal section of degenerated human intervertebral disk (IVD) tissue (Thompson grade IV) stained with FAST demonstrating the regions from which annulus fibrosus (AF), nucleus pulposus (NP), end plate (EP), and Schmorl node (SN) were sampled (circles). (B) Histology of human IVD tissue showing pathologic targets of nerves (top panel), blood vessels (middle panel), and decreased proteoglycan content (bottom panel) colocalized in similar areas of AF, NP, EP, and SN stained with PGP9.5 (Abcam no. ab109261, Cambridge, MA, USA), von Willebrand (Abcam no. ab6994), and FAST (red = collagen, blue = proteoglycan), respectively. Arrows indicate nerves and blood vessels and arrowhead indicates a large capillary network.
Fig. 4Hypothetical model describing therapeutic candidates and targets for painful disk degeneration. Candidates are identified from the notochord due to their importance in patterning the developing intervertebral disk (IVD) and can be isolated from either the notochord or young notochordal nucleus pulposus (NP). Candidates have structure and symptom-modifying potential to treat targets to limit matrix breakdown and neurovascular ingrowth present in the degenerate IVD. Abbreviations: AF, annulus fibrosus; IVD, intervertebral disk; NP, nucleus pulposus; VB, vertebral bodies.
Data extraction table from primary search
| Reference | Summary | Candidate → target | Study design | Species |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ando et al 2011 | • NT induces development of the FP before it degenerates. | Soluble factors from NT → SNPC | In vivo: genetic manipulation | Mouse |
| Bernhardt and Schachner 2000 | • CS at the interface of the somites and notochord. constrains the outgrowth of the ventral motor nerves. | CS → nerves | In vivo: embryo | Zebrafish |
| Bressan et al 2009 | • The NT suppresses EC generation and organization in the midline. | Noggin → blood vessels | In vivo: embryo ablation/ grafting; in vitro: monolayer | Chick/quail: embryo; human: aortic ECs |
| Bruggeman et al 2012 | • Suggests NPs are only present in mammals. | SHH → SNPC (signal for a healthy phenotype) | In vivo | Chick |
| Chamberlain et al 2008 | • SHH concentrates in a gradient near the apically positioned basal body of neural cells in the ventral neural tube. | SHH → anabolism (dose important as SHH patterns neurons) | In vivo: SHH::GFP mice | Mouse |
| Chiou et al 2006 | • CCN2/CTGF promoter-driven GFP transcripts appeared in the NT. | CTGF → SNPC (signal for an NC-like phenotype) | In vivo | Zebrafish |
| Choi et al 2012 | • SHH expression in the NT is sufficient for patterning the entire vertebral column; loss of expression in FP leads to normal IVD and vertebral columns. | SHH → SNPC (signal for a healthy phenotype) | In vivo: tamoxifen-inducible CRE mice | Mouse |
| Conrad et al 2010 | • GAGs bind and could alter nerve growth cone behavior. | GAG → neurons | In vitro: proteomic analysis | Bovine: KS; sturgeon: CSA; chicken: HA |
| Dahia et al 2012 | • SHH expression is necessary for SNPC cell proliferation and IVD cell differentiation in the postnatal mouse. | SHH → SNPC | Ex vivo: IVD organ culture; in vivo: doxycycline-inducible CRE | Mouse |
| Domowicz et al 1995 | • CS proteoglycan from the notochord is biochemically and immunologically distinct from cartilage aggrecan. | CS → notochord | In vivo; embryo | Chick |
| Erwin et al 2006 | • IVD cells cultured with NCCM from canine NPs (either rich or depleted in NCs) or CTGF had increased aggrecan expression. NCCM increased versican and HAS-2 expression. | CTGF/CNN2 → SNPC (increase matrix production; anabolic factor) | In vitro | Dog: NCCM; bovine: disk-derived chondrocytes |
| Erwin et al 2008 | • Canines that retain increased number of NCs are protected from IDD and canines that retain few NCs develop IDD. | CTGF/CNN2 → SNPC (increase matrix production; anabolic factor) | In vitro | Dog: NCCM; bovine: SNPCs |
| Fan and Tessier-Lavigne 1994 | • Notochord and floor plate pattern the somites by inducing the induction of sclerotome markers. | SHH → somites | In vitro | Mouse |
| Fujita and Nagata 2005 | • Contactin-AP bound CS in the NT and its proximal regions. | CSPG → nerves (CSPG recognizes contactin on neurons) | In vivo: embryo; ex vivo: spinal cord and NT explant coculture | Frog |
| Garriock et al 2010 | • During aortae fusion, the NT down regulates expression vessel inhibitors, such as Chordin. | Chordin → blood vessels (inhibits overpositive signals) | In vivo: embryo | Chick/quail |
| Gray and Dale 2010 | • Notch signaling promotes axial progenitor cells to contribute to the FP and inhibits contribution to the NT. | Inhibit Notch → SNPC (signal NC-like phenotype) | In vivo | Chick |
| Harrelson et al 2012 | • Foxa2 is required for NT morphogenesis, axial patterning, and patterning of the dorsal foregut endoderm and expression of markers SHH, T, and Hlxb9. | Foxa2 → SNPC (signal NC-like phenotype) | In vivo: Foxa2(loxP/loxP); Isl1-Cre mutants | Mouse |
| Hayes et al 2011 | • Distributions of CS epitopes are associated with changes during development, maturation, and aging. | CS → SNPC (to bind molecules to proliferate SNPCs) | In vivo: histology, immunohistochemistry microscopy | Rat |
| Hikino et al 2003 | • Oversulfated DS exert neurite outgrowth, promoting activities that were eliminated with chondroitinase B. | Inhibit DS → nerves | In vitro: monolayer | Hagfish/porcine: DS; mouse: neurons |
| Imai et al 2002 | • FoxD is essential for notochord differentiation or induction. | FoxD → notochord | In vivo: embryo | Ciona embryos |
| Lemons et al 2005 | • Hyalectin and decorin CSPG families inhibit neurite outgrowth but neurons adapt by upregulating select integrin α subunits. | Downregulate integrin α subunits → nerves | In vitro: monolayer | Chick: DRGs |
| Liang et al 2001 | • Notochord patterns formation of the dorsal aorta by stimulating adjacent somites to express VEGF. | Notochord → VEGF from somites | In vivo: embryo | Zebrafish |
| Lopez et al 2003 | • Notch activation favors FP development over the NT and requires presenilin. | Inhibit Notch → SNPC (signal NC-like phenotype) | In vivo: embryo | Frog |
| Maier et al 2013 | • Foxa1 and Foxa2 null mice had deformed NP, increased cell death (tail), decreased SHH signaling, defects in the NT sheath, and unusual dorsal-ventral patterning of the neural tube. Single mutants saw no changes. | Foxa1 and Foxa2 → SNPC (healthy NP) | In vivo: Foxa1(−/−); Foxa2(c/c); SHHcreER(T2) | Mouse |
| Masuda et al 2004 | • CSPGs are involved in NT repulsion and perinotochordal sheath repulsion of DRGs during different stages of development. | CSPG → nerves | In vivo: embryo; ex vivo: NT and DRG culture; in vitro: DRG cell culture | Chick: embryo, DRGs, NT; mouse: DRGs |
| Masuda and Shiga 2005 | • In early development the dermamyotome, NT, and ventral spinal cord repulse DRGs; chondroitinase ABC inhibits NT repulsion. | Sema3A and CSPG → nerves | In vitro | Mouse: DRG; chick: NT, dermamyotome, spinal cord |
| Meadows et al 2012 | • Sema3E is an EC repulsive guidance cue that patterns the dorsal aortae in mammals. | Sema3E → blood vessels | In vivo: Sema3a −/−; in vitro: monolayer | Mouse: notochord/ Sem3E; human: ECs |
| Nagase et al 2005 | • VEGF and Ang-1 are expressed in motor neurons located near infiltrating vessels. | SHH → anabolism (dose/time are important as SHH also promotes angiogenesis) | In vivo: embryos immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization | Mouse |
| Nimmagadda et al 2005 | • BMP4 increases VEGFR-2(Quek1) and the number of blood vessels. The NT suppresses Quek1 in the medial somite. | Noggin → blood vessels | In vivo: embryo; CHO B3 cells expressing noggin protein | Chick/quail: embryo |
| Reese et al 2004 | • BMP4 activates EC migration and vessel formation and the NT inhibits of vessel formation along the embryonic midline. | Chordin and Noggin → blood vessels | In vivo: embryo; in vitro: cell migration assays | Quail: embryo, ECs; human: ECs |
| Resende et al 2010 | • NT ablation or SHH inhibitors causes a delay in somite formation. This is rescued by exogenous SHH or RA (suggests pathways converge to inhibit mesoderm Gli activity). | SHH → SNPC and AF cells | In vivo: embryo | Chick |
| Risbud et al 2010 | • All cells in mature NP derived from NCs. | T → SNPC | In vivo | Mouse |
| Stevens et al 2000 | • CD44 is expressed only on NCs during embryonic development of the rat IVD. | NCs → CD44 | In vivo: embryo | Rat |
| Tosney and Oakley 1990 | • Perinotochordal mesenchyme acts as a barrier for axonal growth and patterning. | Notochord → nerves | In vivo: embryo | Chick |
| Vasan et al 1986 | • Notochord increases synthesis of cartilage-specific proteoglycans in somites. | Notochord → CS | In vitro: explants | Chick |
| Winzi et al 2011 | • Used a Noto-GFP reporter to isolate node/NT cells derived from ESCs. | Activin A and inhibition of BMP, Wnt, RA → SNPC (create NC-like cells) | In vitro: monolayer; in vivo: node grafting | Mouse: ESCs; chick: embryo |
| Yamamoto et al 2010 | • Mind bomb ubiquitylates Jagged1 and leads to activation of Notch. Mib-Jag1-Notch signaling favors development of nonvacuolated cells over vacuolated cells. | Inhibit Notch → SNPC (signal NC-like phenotype) | in vitro; in vivo | Zebrafish |
| Abbreviations: Ang-1, angiopoietin-1; AP, alkaline phosphatase fusion protein; BMP, bone morphogenetic protein; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; CS, chondroitin sulfate; HA, hyaluronic acid; CSA, chondroitin sulphate A; CSPG, chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans; CTGF, connective tissue growth factor; DRG, dorsal root ganglia; DS, dermatan sulfate; EC, endothelial cells; ECM, extracellular matrix; FP, floor plate; GAG, glycosaminoglycan; GFP, green fluorescent protein; HAS-2, hyaluronan synthase 2; IDD, intervertebral disk degeneration; IVD, intervertebral disk; KS, keratin sulfate; NC, notochordal cell; NCCM, notochordal cell conditioned media; NP, nucleus pulposus; NT, notochord; RA, retinoic acid; Sem3A, Semaphorin 3A; Sem3E, Semaphorin 3E; SHH, Sonic Hedgehog; SNPC, small nucleus pulposus cell; T, Brachyury; TGFβ, transforming growth factor-β; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; VEGFR, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor; Wnt, wingless-int; ZO, tight junction protein-1. | ||||