Literature DB >> 24436379

Honeybee drones are attracted by groups of consexuals in a walking simulator.

Andreas Simon Brandstaetter1, Florian Bastin, Jean-Christophe Sandoz.   

Abstract

During the mating season, honeybee males, the drones, gather in congregation areas 10-40 m above ground. When a receptive female, a queen, enters the congregation, drones are attracted to her by queen-produced pheromones and visual cues and attempt to mate with the queen in mid-air. It is still unclear how drones and queens find the congregations. Visual cues on the horizon are most probably used for long-range orientation. For shorter-range orientation, however, attraction by a drone-produced aggregation pheromone has been proposed, yet so far its existence has not been confirmed conclusively. The low accessibility of congregation areas high up in the air is a major hurdle and precise control of experimental conditions often remains unsatisfactory in field studies. Here, we used a locomotion compensator-based walking simulator to investigate drones' innate odor preferences under controlled laboratory conditions. We tested behavioral responses of drones to 9-oxo-2-decenoic acid (9-ODA), the major queen-produced sexual attractant, and to queen mandibular pheromone (QMP), an artificial blend of 9-ODA and several other queen-derived components. While 9-ODA strongly dominates the odor bouquet of virgin queens, QMP rather resembles the bouquet of mated queens. In our assay, drones were attracted by 9-ODA, but not by QMP. We also investigated the potential attractiveness of male-derived odors by testing drones' orientation responses to the odor bouquet of groups of 10 living drones or workers. Our results demonstrate that honeybee drones are attracted by groups of other drones (but not by workers), which may indicate a role of drone-emitted cues for the formation of congregations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apis mellifera; Behavior; Congregation area; Mating; Orientation; Pheromone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24436379     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.094292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  7 in total

1.  Evaluating the Role of Drone-Produced Chemical Signals in Mediating Social Interactions in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Gabriel Villar; Megan D Wolfson; Abraham Hefetz; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 2.  The neuroethology of olfactory sex communication in the honeybee Apis mellifera L.

Authors:  Julia Mariette; Julie Carcaud; Jean-Christophe Sandoz
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 5.249

3.  Virgin queen attraction toward males in honey bees.

Authors:  Florian Bastin; Hanna Cholé; Grégory Lafon; Jean-Christophe Sandoz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Olfactory coding in honeybees.

Authors:  Marco Paoli; Giovanni C Galizia
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 5.249

5.  Neuroanatomical differentiation associated with alternative reproductive tactics in male arid land bees, Centris pallida and Amegilla dawsoni.

Authors:  Meghan Barrett; Sophi Schneider; Purnima Sachdeva; Angelina Gomez; Stephen Buchmann; Sean O'Donnell
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Age-specific olfactory attraction between Western honey bee drones (Apis mellifera) and its chemical basis.

Authors:  Florian Bastin; Fabrice Savarit; Grégory Lafon; Jean-Christophe Sandoz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Associative visual learning by tethered bees in a controlled visual environment.

Authors:  Alexis Buatois; Cécile Pichot; Patrick Schultheiss; Jean-Christophe Sandoz; Claudio R Lazzari; Lars Chittka; Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Martin Giurfa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.