Literature DB >> 24436375

The evolution of micro-cursoriality in mammals.

Barry G Lovegrove1, Metobor O Mowoe.   

Abstract

In this study we report on the evolution of micro-cursoriality, a unique case of cursoriality in mammals smaller than 1 kg. We obtained new running speed and limb morphology data for two species of elephant-shrews (Elephantulus spp., Macroscelidae) from Namaqualand, South Africa, which we compared with published data for other mammals. Elephantulus maximum running speeds were higher than those of most mammals smaller than 1 kg. Elephantulus also possess exceptionally high metatarsal:femur ratios (1.07) that are typically associated with fast unguligrade cursors. Cursoriality evolved in the Artiodactyla, Perissodactyla and Carnivora coincident with global cooling and the replacement of forests with open landscapes in the Oligocene and Miocene. The majority of mammal species, though, remained non-cursorial, plantigrade and small (<1 kg). The extraordinary running speed and digitigrady of elephant-shrews was established in the Early Eocene in the earliest macroscelid Prodiacodon, but was probably inherited from Paleocene, Holarctic stem macroscelids. Micro-cursoriality in macroscelids evolved from the plesiomorphic plantigrade foot of the possum-like ancestral mammal earlier than in other mammalian crown groups. Micro-cursoriality evolved first in forests, presumably in response to selection for rapid running speeds facilitated by local knowledge, in order to avoid predators. During the Miocene, micro-cursoriality was pre-adaptive to open, arid habitats, and became more derived in the newly evolved Elephantulus and Macroscelides elephant-shrews with trail running.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cursors; Elephant-shrews; Macroscelidae; Mammals; Running speed

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24436375     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.095737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  8 in total

1.  Transitions between foot postures are associated with elevated rates of body size evolution in mammals.

Authors:  Tai Kubo; Manabu Sakamoto; Andrew Meade; Chris Venditti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mammal survival at the Cretaceous-Palaeogene boundary: metabolic homeostasis in prolonged tropical hibernation in tenrecs.

Authors:  Barry G Lovegrove; Kerileigh D Lobban; Danielle L Levesque
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  No evidence for parallel evolution of cursorial limb adaptations among Neogene South American native ungulates (SANUs).

Authors:  Darin A Croft; Malena Lorente
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Vertical leaping mechanics of the Lesser Egyptian Jerboa reveal specialization for maneuverability rather than elastic energy storage.

Authors:  Talia Y Moore; Alberto M Rivera; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.172

5.  Where Have All the Giants Gone? How Animals Deal with the Problem of Size.

Authors:  Taylor J M Dick; Christofer J Clemente
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Maniraptoran pelvic musculature highlights evolutionary patterns in theropod locomotion on the line to birds.

Authors:  Matthew M Rhodes; Donald M Henderson; Philip J Currie
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Nonplantigrade Foot Posture: A Constraint on Dinosaur Body Size.

Authors:  Tai Kubo; Mugino O Kubo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Why are the fastest runners of intermediate size? Contrasting scaling of mechanical demands and muscle supply of work and power.

Authors:  J R Usherwood; N W Gladman
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.703

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.