BACKGROUND: Increasing utilization of genetic expression profiling (GEP) for thyroid nodules with indeterminate fine needle aspiration (FNA) results will potentially decrease the number of patients requiring diagnostic thyroidectomy. This study sought to determine the potential effects of GEP for indeterminate thyroid FNA results on thyroidectomy volume. METHODS: A retrospective review of thyroidectomy procedures performed over 1 year at the University of Michigan in the endocrine surgery division evaluated the indications for thyroidectomy, FNA Bethesda classification, and final surgical pathology to determine how application of GEP on indeterminate FNA results would affect decision for surgery and subsequent thyroidectomy volume. RESULTS: During the study period, 358 thyroidectomies were performed. The indication for procedure included: FNA findings, n = 122; symptomatic multinodular goiter, n = 85; nodule >4 cm, n = 30; Graves', n = 26; other, n = 95. FNA was performed in 231 patients. Bethesda classification included: benign, n = 69; malignant, n = 55; follicular lesion of undetermined significance, n = 59; follicular neoplasm, n = 20; suspicious for malignancy, n = 16; nondiagnostic, n = 12. If standard GEP was performed for all indeterminate FNA results, it would have influenced the decision for surgery in 68 (19 %) patients. Assuming 38 % of indeterminate FNA specimens will have benign results on genetic profiling, 27 patients would not have undergone thyroidectomy, translating into a 7.2 % decrease in overall thyroidectomy volume over a year. CONCLUSIONS: In an academic endocrine surgery program, the most common indication for thyroidectomy is an FNA result; however, standard application of GEP for all indeterminate thyroid FNAs would result in a minimal reduction in overall thyroidectomy volume.
BACKGROUND: Increasing utilization of genetic expression profiling (GEP) for thyroid nodules with indeterminate fine needle aspiration (FNA) results will potentially decrease the number of patients requiring diagnostic thyroidectomy. This study sought to determine the potential effects of GEP for indeterminate thyroid FNA results on thyroidectomy volume. METHODS: A retrospective review of thyroidectomy procedures performed over 1 year at the University of Michigan in the endocrine surgery division evaluated the indications for thyroidectomy, FNA Bethesda classification, and final surgical pathology to determine how application of GEP on indeterminate FNA results would affect decision for surgery and subsequent thyroidectomy volume. RESULTS: During the study period, 358 thyroidectomies were performed. The indication for procedure included: FNA findings, n = 122; symptomatic multinodular goiter, n = 85; nodule >4 cm, n = 30; Graves', n = 26; other, n = 95. FNA was performed in 231 patients. Bethesda classification included: benign, n = 69; malignant, n = 55; follicular lesion of undetermined significance, n = 59; follicular neoplasm, n = 20; suspicious for malignancy, n = 16; nondiagnostic, n = 12. If standard GEP was performed for all indeterminate FNA results, it would have influenced the decision for surgery in 68 (19 %) patients. Assuming 38 % of indeterminate FNA specimens will have benign results on genetic profiling, 27 patients would not have undergone thyroidectomy, translating into a 7.2 % decrease in overall thyroidectomy volume over a year. CONCLUSIONS: In an academic endocrine surgery program, the most common indication for thyroidectomy is an FNA result; however, standard application of GEP for all indeterminate thyroid FNAs would result in a minimal reduction in overall thyroidectomy volume.
Authors: Darya Chudova; Jonathan I Wilde; Eric T Wang; Hui Wang; Nusrat Rabbee; Camila M Egidio; Jessica Reynolds; Ed Tom; Moraima Pagan; C Ted Rigl; Lyssa Friedman; C Charles Wang; Richard B Lanman; Martha Zeiger; Electron Kebebew; Juan Rosai; Giovanni Fellegara; Virginia A LiVolsi; Giulia C Kennedy Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2010-09-08 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: David S Cooper; Gerard M Doherty; Bryan R Haugen; Bryan R Hauger; Richard T Kloos; Stephanie L Lee; Susan J Mandel; Ernest L Mazzaferri; Bryan McIver; Furio Pacini; Martin Schlumberger; Steven I Sherman; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle Journal: Thyroid Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Erik K Alexander; Giulia C Kennedy; Zubair W Baloch; Edmund S Cibas; Darya Chudova; James Diggans; Lyssa Friedman; Richard T Kloos; Virginia A LiVolsi; Susan J Mandel; Stephen S Raab; Juan Rosai; David L Steward; P Sean Walsh; Jonathan I Wilde; Martha A Zeiger; Richard B Lanman; Bryan R Haugen Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-06-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Daniel S Duick; Joshua P Klopper; James C Diggans; Lyssa Friedman; Giulia C Kennedy; Richard B Lanman; Bryan McIver Journal: Thyroid Date: 2012-08-08 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Leila Yassa; Edmund S Cibas; Carol B Benson; Mary C Frates; Peter M Doubilet; Atul A Gawande; Francis D Moore; Brian W Kim; Vânia Nosé; Ellen Marqusee; P Reed Larsen; Erik K Alexander Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-12-25 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Robert L Ferris; Zubair Baloch; Victor Bernet; Amy Chen; Thomas J Fahey; Ian Ganly; Steven P Hodak; Electron Kebebew; Kepal N Patel; Ashok Shaha; David L Steward; Ralph P Tufano; Sam M Wiseman; Sally E Carty Journal: Thyroid Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Connie Y Chang; Ambrose J Huang; Miriam A Bredella; Martin Torriani; Elkan F Halpern; Daniel I Rosenthal; Dempsey S Springfield Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2015-09-04 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Zeyad T Sahli; Philip W Smith; Christopher B Umbricht; Martha A Zeiger Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2018-04-18 Impact factor: 5.555