Literature DB >> 24435824

Insights into surgical trials: methodological challenges and solutions.

Colette Doerr-Harim1, Thomas Bruckner, Markus K Diener, Phillip Knebel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Novel surgical methods and procedures used to be introduced by experts and were established depending on the corresponding success that was noted. Surgical trials representing evidence level 1b were and still are called into question for different reasons. Prospective randomized controlled trials comparing various surgical strategies that were conducted over the past 11 years in the clinical trial unit in the department of general, visceral, and transplantation surgery of the University of Heidelberg pointed out problems as well as possible solutions for surgical trials' characteristics.
PURPOSE: When planning a study within a department of surgery, several aspects have to be considered. The article aims at outlining pitfalls that have to be dealt with as well as possible solutions by outlining experiences within several conducted trials.
CONCLUSIONS: The compilation of solutions announcing the challenges of surgical studies shows that valid high-quality trials are feasible.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24435824     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-013-1155-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  20 in total

Review 1.  Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  P J Devereaux; Mohit Bhandari; Mike Clarke; Victor M Montori; Deborah J Cook; Salim Yusuf; David L Sackett; Claudio S Cinà; S D Walter; Brian Haynes; Holger J Schünemann; Geoffrey R Norman; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-01-08

2.  Randomized clinical trial comparing venous cutdown with the Seldinger technique for placement of implantable venous access ports.

Authors:  A Nocito; S Wildi; K Rufibach; P-A Clavien; M Weber
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  The problem of the poor control arm in surgical randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  O Strobel; M W Büchler
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 4.  The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.

Authors:  J Bruce; E M Russell; J Mollison; Z H Krukowski
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.014

5.  Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial.

Authors:  Markus K Diener; Christoph M Seiler; Inga Rossion; Jörg Kleeff; Matthias Glanemann; Giovanni Butturini; Ales Tomazic; Christiane J Bruns; Olivier R C Busch; Stefan Farkas; Orlin Belyaev; John P Neoptolemos; Christopher Halloran; Tobias Keck; Marco Niedergethmann; Klaus Gellert; Helmut Witzigmann; Otto Kollmar; Peter Langer; Ulrich Steger; Jens Neudecker; Frederik Berrevoet; Silke Ganzera; Markus M Heiss; Steffen P Luntz; Thomas Bruckner; Meinhard Kieser; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  ChroPac-trial: duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for chronic pancreatitis. Trial protocol of a randomised controlled multicentre trial.

Authors:  Markus K Diener; Thomas Bruckner; Pietro Contin; Christopher Halloran; Matthias Glanemann; Hans Jürgen Schlitt; Joachim Mössner; Meinhard Kieser; Jens Werner; Markus W Büchler; Christoph M Seiler
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Midline versus transverse incision in major abdominal surgery: a randomized, double-blind equivalence trial (POVATI: ISRCTN60734227).

Authors:  Christoph M Seiler; Andreas Deckert; Markus K Diener; Hanns-Peter Knaebel; Markus A Weigand; Norbert Victor; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Pylorus resection or pylorus preservation in partial pancreatico-duodenectomy (PROPP study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thilo Hackert; Thomas Bruckner; Colette Dörr-Harim; Markus K Diener; Phillip Knebel; Werner Hartwig; Oliver Strobel; Stefan Fritz; Lutz Schneider; Jens Werner; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  LigaSure Impact™ versus conventional dissection technique in pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy in clinical suspicion of cancerous tumours on the head of the pancreas: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Tobias Gehrig; Phillip Knebel; Verena Scheel; Ulf Hinz; Christoph M Seiler; Beat P Müller-Stich; Markus W Büchler; Carsten N Gutt
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Protocol of an expertise based randomized trial comparing surgical Venae Sectio versus radiological puncture of Vena Subclavia for insertion of Totally Implantable Access Port in oncological patients.

Authors:  Philip Knebel; Lars Fischer; Eva Cremonese; Ruben Lopez-Benitez; Ulrike Stampfl; Boris Radeleff; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Markus W Büchler; Christoph M Seiler
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  6 in total

1.  [Transvaginal cholecystectomy: results of a randomized study].

Authors:  M Federlein; V A Müller; F Fritze-Büttner; J Burghardt; S Gräber; K Gellert; D H Borchert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Pylorus preservation pancreatectomy or not.

Authors:  Ulla Klaiber; Pascal Probst; Markus W Büchler; Thilo Hackert
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-12-04

3.  Gastrointestinal Complications After Pancreatoduodenectomy With Epidural vs Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Rosa Klotz; Jan Larmann; Christina Klose; Thomas Bruckner; Laura Benner; Colette Doerr-Harim; Solveig Tenckhoff; Johan F Lock; Elmar-Marc Brede; Roberto Salvia; Enrico Polati; Jörg Köninger; Jan-Henrik Schiff; Uwe A Wittel; Alexander Hötzel; Tobias Keck; Carla Nau; Anca-Laura Amati; Christian Koch; Thomas Eberl; Michael Zink; Ales Tomazic; Vesna Novak-Jankovic; Stefan Hofer; Markus K Diener; Markus A Weigand; Markus W Büchler; Phillip Knebel
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 14.766

4.  Frequency of pneumothorax and haemothorax after primary open versus closed implantation strategies for insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in oncological patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Felix J Hüttner; Tom Bruckner; Ingo Alldinger; Roland Hennes; Alexis Ulrich; Markus W Büchler; Markus K Diener; Phillip Knebel
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Impact of preoperative patient education on the prevention of postoperative complications after major visceral surgery: the cluster randomized controlled PEDUCAT trial.

Authors:  Ulla Klaiber; Lisa M Stephan-Paulsen; Thomas Bruckner; Gisela Müller; Silke Auer; Ingrid Farrenkopf; Christine Fink; Colette Dörr-Harim; Markus K Diener; Markus W Büchler; Phillip Knebel
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Pylorus resection versus pylorus preservation in pancreatoduodenectomy (PyloResPres): study protocol and statistical analysis plan for a German multicentre, single-blind, surgical, registry-based randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Bernhard W Renz; Christine Adrion; Carsten Klinger; Matthias Ilmer; Jan G D'Haese; Heinz-J Buhr; Ulrich Mansmann; Jens Werner
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.