Literature DB >> 24435726

Effects of driver characteristics on seat belt fit.

Matthew P Reed1, Sheila M Ebert1, Jason J Hallman2.   

Abstract

A laboratory study of posture and belt fit was conducted with 46 men and 51 women, 61% of whom were age 60 years or older and 32% age 70 years or older. In addition, 28% of the 97 participants were obese, defined as body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m^2. A mockup of a passenger vehicle driver's station was created and five belt anchorage configurations were produced by moving the buckle, outboard-upper (D-ring), and outboard-lower anchorages. An investigator recorded the three-dimensional locations of landmarks on the belt and the participant's body using a coordinate measurement machine. The location of the belt with respect to the underlying skeletal structures was analyzed, along with the length of belt webbing. Using linear regression models, an increase in age from 20 to 80 years resulted in the lap belt positioned 18 mm further forward relative to the pelvis, 26 mm greater lap belt webbing length, and 19 mm greater shoulder belt length. An increase in stature of 350 mm (approximately the range from 5th-percentile female to 95th-percentile male in the U.S. population) was associated with the lap belt 14 mm further forward relative to the pelvis, the shoulder belt 37 mm more outboard relative to the body centerline, and 38 mm less shoulder belt webbing length. Among the driver factors considered, body mass index had the greatest effects. An increase of BMI in 20 kg/m^2, which spans approximately the central 90% of U.S. adults, was associated with the lap belt being placed 102 mm further forward and 94 mm higher, relative to the pelvis, and increases in lap and shoulder belt webbing length of 276 and 258 mm, respectively. Gender did not have important effects on the analyzed belt fit measures after taking into account stature and body mass index. These results offer important considerations for future crash safety assessments and suggest that further research is needed to consider belt fit for older and obese occupants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24435726     DOI: 10.4271/2013-22-0002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stapp Car Crash J        ISSN: 1532-8546


  3 in total

1.  Child Posture and Belt Fit in a Range of Booster Configurations.

Authors:  Monica L H Jones; Sheila Ebert; Miriam A Manary; Matthew P Reed; Kathleen D Klinich
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Can Age or Height Define Appropriate Thresholds for Transition to Adult Seat Belts? An Analysis of Observed Seat Belt Fit in Children Aged 7-12 Years.

Authors:  Anvay Parab; Tom Whyte; Bianca Albanese; Lynne Bilston; Sjaan Koppel; Judith L Charlton; Jake Olivier; Lisa Keay; Julie Brown
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  A numerical study on the safety belt-to-pelvis interaction.

Authors:  Hosein Naseri; Johan Iraeus; Håkan Johansson
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.648

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.