OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at determining if tumor-free distance (TFD) from outermost layer of cervix predicts surgicopathologic factors and outcome in surgically treated cervical cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred sixteen surgically treated cervical squamous cell carcinomas between 1991 and 2010 with FIGO stage IB/2A were identified and re-evaluated histologically regarding the TFD. TFD was defined as the distance between outermost layer of cervix and deepest cervical stromal invasion. Depth of invasion (DOI) and TFD were expressed as continuous variables and compared with traditional surgicopathologic variables and survival to determine their prognostic significance. RESULTS: The mean DOI was 10.3 mm and the mean TFD was 4.2 mm. The most common stage was IB1 (60 patients, 51.7 %). The mean number of removed pelvic lymph nodes was 32.2 (median 30; range 8-78). Positive pelvic lymph nodes were found in 27 (23 %) of the patients. Sixty-eight patients had lymphovascular space involvement (LVSI). Sixty-eight patients (59 %) received postoperative radiotherapy where the following items were present: tumor diameter >4 cm, positive lymph nodes, LVSI and positive surgical margins. With the median follow-up of 53 months (3-219 months); 14 patients had local and 13 patients had distant metastases (5 of the patients had both at the time of recurrence). With logistic regression analysis, TFD was a predictor of pelvic lymph involvement (p = 0.028) and LVSI (p = 0.008) while DOI was a predictor of LVSI (p = 0.044). In Cox regression analysis, increased TFD was associated with improved disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.007). DFS curves (for TFD cut off value 2.5 mm) according to Kaplan-Meier were found to be statistically significant (log rank test = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that TFD is predictive of pelvic lymph node involvement, LVSI and patient outcome in surgically treated cervical cancer patients. However, prospective measurement of TFD is still necessary to determine its value in clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at determining if tumor-free distance (TFD) from outermost layer of cervix predicts surgicopathologic factors and outcome in surgically treated cervical cancerpatients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred sixteen surgically treated cervical squamous cell carcinomas between 1991 and 2010 with FIGO stage IB/2A were identified and re-evaluated histologically regarding the TFD. TFD was defined as the distance between outermost layer of cervix and deepest cervical stromal invasion. Depth of invasion (DOI) and TFD were expressed as continuous variables and compared with traditional surgicopathologic variables and survival to determine their prognostic significance. RESULTS: The mean DOI was 10.3 mm and the mean TFD was 4.2 mm. The most common stage was IB1 (60 patients, 51.7 %). The mean number of removed pelvic lymph nodes was 32.2 (median 30; range 8-78). Positive pelvic lymph nodes were found in 27 (23 %) of the patients. Sixty-eight patients had lymphovascular space involvement (LVSI). Sixty-eight patients (59 %) received postoperative radiotherapy where the following items were present: tumor diameter >4 cm, positive lymph nodes, LVSI and positive surgical margins. With the median follow-up of 53 months (3-219 months); 14 patients had local and 13 patients had distant metastases (5 of the patients had both at the time of recurrence). With logistic regression analysis, TFD was a predictor of pelvic lymph involvement (p = 0.028) and LVSI (p = 0.008) while DOI was a predictor of LVSI (p = 0.044). In Cox regression analysis, increased TFD was associated with improved disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.007). DFS curves (for TFD cut off value 2.5 mm) according to Kaplan-Meier were found to be statistically significant (log rank test = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that TFD is predictive of pelvic lymph node involvement, LVSI and patient outcome in surgically treated cervical cancerpatients. However, prospective measurement of TFD is still necessary to determine its value in clinical practice.