H Löffler1, K Neben, A Krämer. 1. Klinische Kooperationseinheit Molekulare Hämatologie/Onkologie des Deutschen Krebsforschungszentrums und der Medizinischen Klinik V, Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Abstract
DEFINITION: The term cancer of unknown primary (CUP) describes by definition epithelial malignancies for which no primary tumor can be found after primary diagnostics have been performed. EPIDEMIOLOGY: The CUP syndrome constitutes 2-3% of all fatal cases of malignancies in both men and women. The proportion of women has increased in parallel to the increase of tobacco consumption in women. PATHOGENESIS: The most frequent origin appears to lie in the lungs or upper abdominal organs, while notable differences can be found between older autopsy findings and recent gene expression data with respect to identified primary tumors or tissue assignation. The fact that a primary tumor cannot be identified is probably based on various reasons: a complete regression of a primary tumor in isolated cases seems to be just as plausible as the misclassification of a primary tumor as a metastasis. CONCLUSION: In combination with the fact that a primary tumor cannot be identified by autopsy in more than 20 % of cases, the important conclusion can be drawn that curative approaches seem appropriate for localized CUP cases.
DEFINITION: The term cancer of unknown primary (CUP) describes by definition epithelial malignancies for which no primary tumor can be found after primary diagnostics have been performed. EPIDEMIOLOGY: The CUP syndrome constitutes 2-3% of all fatal cases of malignancies in both men and women. The proportion of women has increased in parallel to the increase of tobacco consumption in women. PATHOGENESIS: The most frequent origin appears to lie in the lungs or upper abdominal organs, while notable differences can be found between older autopsy findings and recent gene expression data with respect to identified primary tumors or tissue assignation. The fact that a primary tumor cannot be identified is probably based on various reasons: a complete regression of a primary tumor in isolated cases seems to be just as plausible as the misclassification of a primary tumor as a metastasis. CONCLUSION: In combination with the fact that a primary tumor cannot be identified by autopsy in more than 20 % of cases, the important conclusion can be drawn that curative approaches seem appropriate for localized CUP cases.
Authors: Kyung Won Kim; Katherine M Krajewski; Jyothi P Jagannathan; Mizuki Nishino; Atul B Shinagare; Jason L Hornick; Nikhil H Ramaiya Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: J Califano; W H Westra; W Koch; G Meininger; A Reed; L Yip; J O Boyle; F Lonardo; D Sidransky Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1999-04-07 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: S Offner; W Schmaus; K Witter; G B Baretton; G Schlimok; B Passlick; G Riethmüller; K Pantel Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1999-06-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: I Petersen; A Hidalgo; S Petersen; K Schlüns; C Schewe; M Pacyna-Gengelbach; A Goeze; B Krebber; T Knösel; O Kaufmann; J Szymas; A von Deimling Journal: Brain Pathol Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 6.508
Authors: Jos Straetmans; Julia Vent; Martin Lacko; Ernst-Jan Speel; Christian Huebbers; Robert Semrau; Frank Hoebers; Zlatan Mujagic; Jens-Peter Klussmann; Simon F Preuss; Bernd Kremer Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2014-03-11 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Harald Löffler; Joe Puthenparambil; Thomas Hielscher; Kai Neben; Alwin Krämer Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2014-07-07 Impact factor: 5.594