Sarita Sonalkar1, Sheila Mody2, Mary E Gaffield3. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, USA. Electronic address: sarita.sonalkar@bmc.org. 2. Department of Reproductive Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA. 3. Department of Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: WHO recommends birth spacing to improve the health of the mother and child. One strategy to facilitate birth spacing is to improve the use of family planning during the first year postpartum. OBJECTIVES: To determine from the literature the effectiveness of postpartum family-planning programs and to identify research gaps. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched for articles published between database inception and March 2013. Abstracts of conference presentations, dissertations, and unpublished studies were also considered. SELECTION CRITERIA: Published studies with birth spacing or contraceptive use outcomes were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Standard abstract forms and the US Preventive Services Task Force grading system were used to summarize and assess the quality of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-four studies were included. Prenatal care, home visitation programs, and educational interventions were associated with improved family-planning outcomes, but should be further studied in low-resource settings. Mother-infant care integration, multidisciplinary interventions, and cash transfer/microfinance interventions need further investigation. CONCLUSIONS: Programmatic interventions may improve birth spacing and contraceptive uptake. Larger well-designed studies in international settings are needed to determine the most effective ways to deliver family-planning interventions.
BACKGROUND: WHO recommends birth spacing to improve the health of the mother and child. One strategy to facilitate birth spacing is to improve the use of family planning during the first year postpartum. OBJECTIVES: To determine from the literature the effectiveness of postpartum family-planning programs and to identify research gaps. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched for articles published between database inception and March 2013. Abstracts of conference presentations, dissertations, and unpublished studies were also considered. SELECTION CRITERIA: Published studies with birth spacing or contraceptive use outcomes were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Standard abstract forms and the US Preventive Services Task Force grading system were used to summarize and assess the quality of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-four studies were included. Prenatal care, home visitation programs, and educational interventions were associated with improved family-planning outcomes, but should be further studied in low-resource settings. Mother-infant care integration, multidisciplinary interventions, and cash transfer/microfinance interventions need further investigation. CONCLUSIONS: Programmatic interventions may improve birth spacing and contraceptive uptake. Larger well-designed studies in international settings are needed to determine the most effective ways to deliver family-planning interventions.
Authors: Maureen M Black; Margaret E Bentley; Mia A Papas; Sarah Oberlander; Laureen O Teti; Scot McNary; Katherine Le; Melissa O'Connell Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Kathy S Katz; Margaret Rodan; Renee Milligan; Sylvia Tan; Lauren Courtney; Marie Gantz; Susan M Blake; Lenora McClain; Maurice Davis; Michele Kiely; Siva Subramanian Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2011-12
Authors: H Kitzman; D L Olds; K Sidora; C R Henderson; C Hanks; R Cole; D W Luckey; J Bondy; K Cole; J Glazner Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-04-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Kathleen F Norr; Kathleen S Crittenden; Evelyn L Lehrer; Olga Reyes; Cynthia B Boyd; Karla W Nacion; Kaoru Watanabe Journal: Public Health Nurs Date: 2003 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.462