Literature DB >> 24433247

Cardiopulmonary bypass standby avoids fatality due to vascular laceration in laser-assisted lead extraction.

Wei Wang1, Xiaowei Wang, Dennis Modry, Shaohua Wang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Vascular laceration is a rare but potentially fatal complication with excimer laser-assisted pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead extraction. We report our experience on management of vascular laceration during laser-assisted lead extraction.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 140 consecutive patients undergoing laser-assisted lead extraction from May 2004 to March 2011. Clinical outcomes were compared in patients with and without intraoperative vascular laceration. Risk factors were identified by multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: All cases were performed in the operating room with cardiopulmonary bypass standby. Complete lead removal was achieved in 118 (84.3%) patients. Potentially fatal complications occurred in five patients (3.6%) who had superior vena cava and/or innominate vein laceration. Lacerated veins were repaired under emergency sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. The mean time from vascular laceration to establishment of cardiopulmonary bypass was 6.0 ± 3.6 minutes. All five patients survived without neurological sequelae. The rates of dual-coil leads (80.0% vs. 31.9%, p=0.025) and history of lead revision (100.0% vs. 40.0%, p=0.008) were significantly higher in the five patients who had major vascular laceration than those who did not. Logistic regression showed that dual-coil implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead was an independent risk factor for vascular laceration (odds ratio 11.264, p=0.048).
CONCLUSION: Cardiopulmonary bypass standby is helpful when performing laser-assisted lead extraction to treat potentially fatal vascular laceration. Dual-coil lead is an independent risk factor to predict intraoperative vascular laceration.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24433247     DOI: 10.1111/jocs.12294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Surg        ISSN: 0886-0440            Impact factor:   1.620


  4 in total

1.  The role of cardiac surgery in transvenous lead extraction. A high-volume center experience with 3207 procedures.

Authors:  Łukasz Tułecki; Marek Czajkowski; Sylwia Targońska; Konrad Tomków; Dorota Nowosielecka; Wojciech Jacheć; Anna Polewczyk; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2022-10-08

2.  Analysis of Risk Factors for Major Complications of 1500 Transvenous Lead Extraction Procedures with Especial Attention to Tricuspid Valve Damage.

Authors:  Łukasz Tułecki; Anna Polewczyk; Wojciech Jacheć; Dorota Nowosielecka; Konrad Tomków; Paweł Stefańczyk; Jarosław Kosior; Krzysztof Duda; Maciej Polewczyk; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Comparison between laser sheaths, femoral approach and rotating mechanical sheaths for lead extraction.

Authors:  F A Bracke; N Rademakers; N Verberkmoes; M Van 't Veer; B M van Gelder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 2.854

4.  Is cardiopulmonary bypass standby still required for laser lead extractions?

Authors:  Lindsay Volk; Nina Verghis; Hirohisa Ikegami; Manabu Takebe; Mark J Russo; Leonard Y Lee; Anthony Lemaire
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 1.522

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.