Literature DB >> 24432970

Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus multiport laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: analysis of 80 cases in a single center.

Robert Sucher1, Thomas Resch, Elisabeth Mohr, Alexander Perathoner, Matthias Biebl, Johann Pratschke, Reinhard Mittermair.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Through efficacy and improved safety, multiport laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LAPS-G) has emerged as an important and broadly available treatment option for people with severe and complex obesity. Because a single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SILS-G) would be less invasive, we applied this novel surgical technique for a selected number of patients enrolled into our minimally invasive bariatric program. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from 80 morbidly obese patients who qualified for SILS-G or LAPS-G was performed from January 2011 to May 2012.
RESULTS: SILS-G and LAPS-G were performed in 40 patients, respectively. All patients were female. Mean age was 41 (range, 19-73) years (SILS-G, 37 [19-62] years; LAPS-G, 43 [24-73] years; P=not significant). Preoperative body mass index was 40.8 (35.1-45.0) kg/m(2) in the SILS-G group and 43.8 (35.0-47.8) kg/m(2) in the LAPS-G group (P=not significant). Total operative time was significantly lower in the SILS-G group (85±21 minutes) compared with the LAPS-G group (97±26 minutes) (P<.05). Median percentage excess weight loss was comparable in both groups (SILS-G, 57.2%; LAPS-G, 53.7%) at 6.6 months after surgery. Mean hospital stay was 5 days (SILS-G, 5 [4-24] days; LAPS-G, 6 [4-14] days; P=not significant). Complication rates were low in both groups: leakage, 2.5% in SILS-G and 0% in LAPS-G; bleeding, 2.5% in SILS-G and 2.5% in LAPS-G; and trocar-site hernia, 0% in both groups. Patients operated on with single-incision laparoscopy had a significantly better cosmetic outcome as assessed by a scar satisfaction assessment questionnaire (P<.01).
CONCLUSIONS: SILS-G is a feasible and safe operative procedure that leads to a significant reduction of total operative time compared with a multiport access procedure. Further potential benefits associated with single-incision laparoscopic surgery remain to be investigated objectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24432970     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2013.0250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  8 in total

1.  Postoperative Bleeding and Leakage After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Mousa Khoursheed; Ibtisam Al-Bader; Ali Mouzannar; Aqeel Ashraf; Yousef Bahzad; Abdulla Al-Haddad; Ali Sayed; Abe Fingerhut
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Impact of Routine 12 mm Epigastric Trocar Site Closure on Incisional Hernia After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Prospective Before/After Study.

Authors:  Lionel Rebibo; Marion Demouron; Jeanne Dembinski; Abdennaceur Dhahri; Thierry Yzet; Jean-Marc Regimbeau
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Reduced-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbidly Obese Japanese Patients: a Retrospective Case-Matched Study.

Authors:  Manabu Amiki; Yosuke Seki; Kazunori Kasama; Srinivasulu Pachimatla; Michiko Kitagawa; Akiko Umezawa; Yoshimochi Kurokawa
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Retrospective Comparison of Single-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Three-Port Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Propensity Score Adjustment Analysis.

Authors:  Claudio Mauriello; Elie Chouillard; Antonio d'alessandro; Gianpaolo Marte; Argyri Papadimitriou; Elias Chahine; Radwan Kassir
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 5.  Single Incision Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Review.

Authors:  Anastasios Stefanopoulos; Konstantinos P Economopoulos; Vasileios Kalles
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Prospective Comparison and Quality of Life for Single-Incision and Conventional Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in a Series of Morbidly Obese Patients.

Authors:  Andrea Porta; Alberto Aiolfi; Cinzia Musolino; Ilaria Antonini; Marco Antonio Zappa
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Comparison of Early Results and Complications between Multi-and Single-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomized Clinical Study.

Authors:  Seyed Vahid Hosseini; Seyed Ali Hosseini; Ahmed Mohammed Ali Hussein Al-Hurry; Hajar Khazraei; Fatemeh Ganji; Fatemeh Sadeghi
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2017-05

8.  Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in five staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michel Gagner; Paul Kemmeter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 4.584

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.