Literature DB >> 24432872

Reduction in the length of stay with rivaroxaban as a single-drug regimen for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

Bonno van Bellen1, Luke Bamber, Francine Correa de Carvalho, Martin Prins, Maria Wang, Anthonie W A Lensing.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The phase III EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE trials demonstrated the potential of oral rivaroxaban for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). The length of initial hospitalization in patients presenting with either symptomatic DVT or PE was assessed using hospitalization records from these trials.
METHODS: Analyses were carried out in the intention-to-treat population, using non-parametric and parametric statistical methods.
RESULTS: Overall, 52% (1781/3434) of EINSTEIN DVT patients and 90% (4328/4821) of EINSTEIN PE patients were admitted to hospital. The proportion of hospitalized patients with a length of stay of five or fewer days receiving rivaroxaban was 54% compared with 31% for enoxaparin/vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in patients with DVT. For patients with PE, the corresponding values were 45% and 33%. Stays of 6-10 days were observed in 29% of rivaroxaban-treated patients compared with 45% of enoxaparin/VKA-treated patients for DVT. For patients with PE, these values were 39% and 46% in the rivaroxaban and enoxaparin/VKA groups, respectively. Overall, length of stay was significantly shorter in the rivaroxaban group, compared with the enoxaparin/VKA group across all analyses performed (p < 0.0001). Across regions, the observed admission rates and length of stay duration varied greatly: Asia had the longest overall hospitalization rates, whereas the lowest rates were reported in North America, Australia and New Zealand. Nevertheless, a consistent trend was observed: length of hospital stay in patients with DVT or PE receiving rivaroxaban was shorter than, or at least similar to, patients receiving enoxaparin/VKA.
CONCLUSION: A single-drug regimen with rivaroxaban may reduce the burden on healthcare systems and patients, and provides effective and well tolerated treatment. The studies shared an open-label design that allowed comparison of initial hospitalization, but limitations include the well monitored clinical trial setting in which decisions on admission and discharge could vary from real-world management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24432872     DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2013.879439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  24 in total

1.  Initiation of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for venous thromboembolism: impact on time to hospital discharge.

Authors:  Amanda N Basto; Nathan P Fewel; Kim Vo; Eileen M Stock; Mia Ta
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  The management of venous thromboembolism: A practical tool for the front-line clinician.

Authors:  Tammy J Bungard; William Semchuk
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2017-02-09

3.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban for Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism in Greece.

Authors:  George Gourzoulidis; Georgia Kourlaba; John Kakisis; Mitiadis Matsagkas; George Giannakoulas; Konstantinos I Gourgoulianis; Theodoros Vassilakopoulos; Nikos Maniadakis
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  Hospital length-of-stay and costs among pulmonary embolism patients treated with rivaroxaban versus parenteral bridging to warfarin.

Authors:  Erin R Weeda; Philip S Wells; W Frank Peacock; Gregory J Fermann; Christopher W Baugh; Veronica Ashton; Concetta Crivera; Peter Wildgoose; Jeff R Schein; Craig I Coleman
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.397

5.  Comparing Length of Stay Between Patients Taking Rivaroxaban and Conventional Anticoagulants for Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism.

Authors:  Anish Desai; Amishi Desai; Rose Calixte; Malaygiri Aparnath; Alexander Hindenburg; Steve Salzman; Joseph P Mathew
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 6.  Secondary prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism after initial oral anticoagulation therapy in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Lindsay Robertson; Su Ern Yeoh; Ahmad Ramli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-12-15

7.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment of venous thromboembolism with rivaroxaban compared with combined low molecular weight heparin/vitamin K antagonist.

Authors:  Luke Bamber; Dominic Muston; Euan McLeod; Anne Guillermin; Julia Lowin; Raj Patel
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2015-06-11

Review 8.  Direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of venous thromboembolism, with a focus on patients with pulmonary embolism: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Antonio Gómez-Outes; M Luisa Suárez-Gea; Ramón Lecumberri; Ana Isabel Terleira-Fernández; Emilio Vargas-Castrillón
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2014-11-07

Review 9.  Oral direct thrombin inhibitors or oral factor Xa inhibitors for the treatment of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Lindsay Robertson; Patrick Kesteven; James E McCaslin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-04

10.  Length of Stay Comparison between Rivaroxaban and Warfarin in the Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism: Results from a Real-World Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kirsten M Roberts; Tamara B Knight; Eimeira Padilla-Tolentino; Manasa Murthy; Evan J Peterson
Journal:  Thrombosis       Date:  2015-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.