Literature DB >> 24432071

An evaluation of supracondylar humerus fractures: is there a correlation between postponing treatment and the need for open surgical intervention?

John M Kronner1, Julie E Legakis1, Natalia Kovacevic1, Ronald L Thomas2, Richard A K Reynolds1, Eric T Jones1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the treatment and recovery of patients treated for Gartland type III supracondylar humerus fractures in order to determine if postponing treatment leads to a higher rate of open surgical treatment or complications.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted examining the medical records of children with Gartland type III supracondylar humerus fractures at our institution for a two-year period. The patients included in the study were treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).
RESULTS: After exclusions, 134 patients were included in the study, with an average age of 5.6 years. The patients were grouped according to whether their treatment was postponed (39.6 %) or immediate (60.4 %). The majority of all patients were treated using CRPP: 46 (86.8 %) of the postponed patients and 75 (92.6 %) of the immediate patients. Very few postsurgical complications occurred in the patients; there was only one (1.6 %) case of iatrogenic nerve injury in a postponed patient as well as four (3.8 %) cases of loss of carrying angle: one (2.3 %) in postponed patients and three (4.8 %) in immediate patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Postponing treatment of type III supracondylar humerus fractures in children did not lead to an increase in open surgical treatment; nor did it lead to an increase in complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Closed reduction percutaneous pinning; Delayed fracture treatment; Pediatric; Supracondylar humerus fracture

Year:  2013        PMID: 24432071      PMCID: PMC3593016          DOI: 10.1007/s11832-013-0482-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Orthop        ISSN: 1863-2521            Impact factor:   1.548


  24 in total

1.  Displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children: results of a national survey of paediatric orthopaedic consultants.

Authors:  W Y Kim; R Chandru; A Bonshahi; R W Paton
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 2.  Review article: paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: emergency assessment and management.

Authors:  Stephen R Allen; Jacqueline R Hang; Raphael C Hau
Journal:  Emerg Med Australas       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 2.151

3.  Surgical approaches for open reduction and pinning in severely displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Juan Pretell Mazzini; Juan Rodriguez Martin; Eva María Andres Esteban
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 1.548

4.  The effects of surgical delay on the outcome of pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures.

Authors:  Joshua G Bales; Hillard T Spencer; Melissa A Wong; Yi-Jen Fong; Lewis E Zionts; Mauricio Silva
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.324

5.  An inconvenient truth: treatment of displaced paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures.

Authors:  M Donnelly; C Green; I P Kelly
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.392

6.  Effect of deferred treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures.

Authors:  James P Cashman; Shane M Guerin; Mascha Hemsing; Damian McCormack
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2010-02-07       Impact factor: 2.392

7.  Displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children: open reduction vs. closed reduction and pinning.

Authors:  Gürkan Ozkoc; Ugur Gonc; Asim Kayaalp; Kursat Teker; Tulay Tuncer Peker
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Use of the Gartland classification system for treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures.

Authors:  Gregory Mallo; Scott J C Stanat; John Gaffney
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.390

9.  Delaying treatment of supracondylar fractures in children: has the pendulum swung too far?

Authors:  M Ramachandran; D L Skaggs; H A Crawford; D M Eastwood; F D Lalonde; M G Vitale; T T Do; R M Kay
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-09

Review 10.  A systematic review of early versus delayed treatment for type III supracondylar humeral fractures in children.

Authors:  C L Loizou; C Simillis; J R Hutchinson
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 2.586

View more
  5 in total

1.  Factors associated with conversion to open reduction of type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures in children.

Authors:  Andrea Biaggi Ondina; Layla A Haidar; Braden Goldberg; Alfred Mansour; Shiraz Younas; Jacob Siahaan; Lindsay Crawford
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-05-25

2.  Timing of osteosynthesis of fractures in children changes the outcome.

Authors:  Danielle S Wendling-Keim; Marion Binder; Hans-Georg Dietz; Markus Lehner
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Emergency room closed reduction versus in situ splinting in the treatment of paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures.

Authors:  S M Sylvia; K J Maguire; D A Molho; B J Levens; M E Jr Stone; R Hanstein; J F Schulz; E D Fornari
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 1.548

4.  Postponing surgery of paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures to office hours increases consultant attendance in operations and saves operative room time.

Authors:  N Tuomilehto; A Sommarhem; P Salminen; A Y Nietosvaara
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 1.548

5.  Prognostic Factors for the Outcome of Supracondylar Humeral Fractures in Children.

Authors:  Danielle S Wendling-Keim; Marion Binder; Hans-Georg Dietz; Markus Lehner
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 2.071

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.