Literature DB >> 24431971

Comparison of unilateral squat strength between the dominant and non-dominant leg in men and women.

Kevin McCurdy1, George Langford1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare unilateral squat strength of the dominant and non-dominant leg in young adult men and women. Seventeen apparently healthy men (mean mass 90.5 ± 20.9 kg and age 21.7 ± 1.8 yrs) and 25 women (mean mass 62.2 ± 14.5 kg and age 21.9 ± 1.3 yrs) completed the study. To determine unilateral strength, the subjects completed a one repetition maximum (1RM) modified unilateral squat (MUS) on the dominant and non-dominant leg. The subjects completed the squat to a depth that attained a 90° angle at the knee. This exercise was executed by placing the top of the metatarsophalangeal area of the foot of the uninvolved leg on a support bar behind the subject to isolate the use of the lead leg. Paired samples t-test revealed no significant difference between the men's 1RM mean strength on the dominant (107.0 ± 21.4 kg) and non-dominant (106.0 ± 21.4 kg) leg with a mean side-to-side difference (comparing the stronger to the weaker leg) of 2.8 %. Leg strength symmetry was also found between the women's 1RM mean strength on the dominant (45.3 ± 12.5 kg) and non-dominant (45.0 ± 12.4 kg) leg with a mean side-to-side difference of 5.0 %. The data indicate that unilateral squat strength, measured in a weight bearing stance, is similar in the dominant and non-dominant leg in apparently healthy young adult men and women. Key PointsMUS strength was similar between the dominant and non-dominant leg in young adult men and women.Mean side-to-side differences (comparing the stronger to the weaker leg) resulted from higher dominant and non-dominant scores for the men and womenThe range of side-to-side differences warrants the practice of weight bearing strength assessment to identify those at risk for injury.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Closed Chain; limb symmetry; single-leg strength; unilateral assessment

Year:  2005        PMID: 24431971      PMCID: PMC3880882     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  23 in total

1.  Orientation and familiarization to 1RM strength testing in old and young women.

Authors:  L L Ploutz-Snyder; E L Giamis
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  The relationship between muscle cross-sectional area and strength in various isokinetic movements among soccer players.

Authors:  Kazumi Masuda; Nobuo Kikuhara; Hideyuki Takahashi; Kunio Yamanaka
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.337

3.  Concentric and eccentric quadriceps torque in pre-adolescent males.

Authors:  N G Mohtadi; G N Kiefer; K Tedford; S Watters
Journal:  Can J Sport Sci       Date:  1990-12

4.  A comparison of isokinetic and isotonic predictions of a functional task.

Authors:  M L Cordova; C D Ingersoll; J E Kovaleski; K L Knight
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Quantitative assessment of functional limitations in normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees.

Authors:  S D Barber; F R Noyes; R E Mangine; J W McCloskey; W Hartman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Effects of Speed and Limb Dominance on Eccentric and Concentric lsokinetic Testing of the Knee.

Authors:  P A Hageman; D M Gillaspie; L D Hill
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  Isokinetic knee extensor strength and functional performance in healthy female soccer players.

Authors:  A Ostenberg; E Roos; C Ekdahl; H Roos
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.221

8.  Relationship of knee extensor strength and hopping test performance in the assessment of lower extremity function.

Authors:  H B Greenberger; M V Paterno
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.751

9.  Isokinetic measurement in preadolescent males.

Authors:  J Burnie; D A Brodie
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.118

10.  Knee extensor performance of dominant and non-dominant limb throughout repeated isokinetic contractions, with special reference to peak torque and mean frequency of the EMG.

Authors:  B Lindström; S Karlsson; B Gerdle
Journal:  Clin Physiol       Date:  1995-05
View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparison of abdominal muscle activity during a single-legged hold in the hook-lying position on the floor and on a round foam roll.

Authors:  Su-Jung Kim; Oh-Yun Kwon; Chung-Hwi Yi; Hye-Seon Jeon; Jae-Seop Oh; Heon-Seock Cynn; Jong-Hyuck Weon
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Inter-limb asymmetry in youth elite soccer players: Effect of loading conditions.

Authors:  Giampiero Ascenzi; Cristoforo Filetti; Valter Di Salvo; F Javier Nuñez; Luis Suarez-Arrones; Bruno Ruscello; Fabio Massimo Francioni; Alberto Mendez Villanueva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Multiple sclerosis affects skeletal muscle characteristics.

Authors:  Inez Wens; Ulrik Dalgas; Frank Vandenabeele; Maartje Krekels; Lotte Grevendonk; Bert O Eijnde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The effect of Astym® Therapy on muscle strength: a blinded, randomized, clinically controlled trial.

Authors:  Benjamin R Kivlan; Christopher R Carcia; F Richard Clemente; Amy L Phelps; RobRoy L Martin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Lower Limb Neuromuscular Asymmetry in Volleyball and Basketball Players.

Authors:  Azahara Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe; Gabriel Gual; Daniel Romero-Rodriguez; Viswanath Unnitha
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 2.193

6.  Lower Limb Symmetry: Comparison of Muscular Power Between Dominant and Nondominant Legs in Healthy Young Adults Associated With Single-Leg-Dominant Sports.

Authors:  Alex Vaisman; Rodrigo Guiloff; Juan Rojas; Iris Delgado; David Figueroa; Rafael Calvo
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-12-21

7.  The effect of increasing heel height on lower limb symmetry during the back squat in trained and novice lifters.

Authors:  Mark G L Sayers; S H Hosseini Nasab; Caroline Bachem; William R Taylor; Renate List; Silvio Lorenzetti
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-07-25

8.  Leg dominancy in relation to fast isometric torque production and squat jump height.

Authors:  Cornelis Jo de Ruiter; Alex de Korte; Sander Schreven; Arnold de Haan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.078

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.