Literature DB >> 24431970

Kinetic consequences of constraining running behavior.

John A Mercer1, Neil E Bezodis2, Mike Russell1, Andy Purdy1, David Delion1.   

Abstract

It is known that impact forces increase with running velocity as well as when stride length increases. Since stride length naturally changes with changes in submaximal running velocity, it was not clear which factor, running velocity or stride length, played a critical role in determining impact characteristics. The aim of the study was to investigate whether or not stride length influences the relationship between running velocity and impact characteristics. Eight volunteers (mass=72.4 ± 8.9 kg; height = 1.7 ± 0.1 m; age = 25 ± 3.4 years) completed two running conditions: preferred stride length (PSL) and stride length constrained at 2.5 m (SL2.5). During each condition, participants ran at a variety of speeds with the intent that the range of speeds would be similar between conditions. During PSL, participants were given no instructions regarding stride length. During SL2.5, participants were required to strike targets placed on the floor that resulted in a stride length of 2.5 m. Ground reaction forces were recorded (1080 Hz) as well as leg and head accelerations (uni-axial accelerometers). Impact force and impact attenuation (calculated as the ratio of head and leg impact accelerations) were recorded for each running trial. Scatter plots were generated plotting each parameter against running velocity. Lines of best fit were calculated with the slopes recorded for analysis. The slopes were compared between conditions using paired t-tests. Data from two subjects were dropped from analysis since the velocity ranges were not similar between conditions resulting in the analysis of six subjects. The slope of impact force vs. velocity relationship was different between conditions (PSL: 0.178 ± 0.16 BW/m·s(-1); SL2.5: -0.003 ± 0.14 BW/m·s(-1); p < 0.05). The slope of the impact attenuation vs. velocity relationship was different between conditions (PSL: 5.12 ± 2.88 %/m·s(-1); SL2.5: 1.39 ± 1.51 %/m·s(-1); p < 0.05). Stride length was an important factor that determined impact force magnitude. It is likely that lower extremity posture is a determining factor influencing impact characteristics. Key PointsAs running velocity increased, the magnitude of the vertical ground reaction impact force increased as expected.As running velocity increased, stride length increased as expected.When stride length was constrained to be 2.5 m for all running velocities, the magnitude of the vertical ground reaction impact force did not increase as expected.When running different velocities, the changes in the magnitude of the vertical ground reaction impact force was related to stride length changes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ground reaction force; impact attenuation; shock

Year:  2005        PMID: 24431970      PMCID: PMC3880881     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  14 in total

1.  Impacts and kinematic adjustments during an exhaustive run.

Authors:  Timothy R Derrick; Darrin Dereu; Scott P McLean
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Individual effects of stride length and frequency on shock attenuation during running.

Authors:  John A Mercer; Paul Devita; Tim R Derrick; Barry T Bates
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Relationship between shock attenuation and stride length during running at different velocities.

Authors:  John A Mercer; Jason Vance; Alan Hreljac; Joseph Hamill
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2002-06-14       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  The effects of knee contact angle on impact forces and accelerations.

Authors:  Timothy R Derrick
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Evaluation of lower extremity overuse injury potential in runners.

Authors:  A Hreljac; R N Marshall; P A Hume
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Energy absorption of impacts during running at various stride lengths.

Authors:  T R Derrick; J Hamill; G E Caldwell
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Lower-limb actions while running at different velocities.

Authors:  W E Sinning; H L Forsyth
Journal:  Med Sci Sports       Date:  1970

8.  Ground reaction forces in running: a reexamination.

Authors:  C F Munro; D I Miller; A J Fuglevand
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Direct dynamics simulation of the impact phase in heel-toe running.

Authors:  K G Gerritsen; A J van den Bogert; B M Nigg
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Characteristics of shock attenuation during fatigued running.

Authors:  J A Mercer; B T Bates; J S Dufek; A Hreljac
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.337

View more
  8 in total

1.  Determining if muscle activity is related to preferred stride frequency during running in the water and on land.

Authors:  Kenji Masumoto; Joshua P Bailey; John A Mercer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Wearables for Running Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rachel Mason; Liam T Pearson; Gillian Barry; Fraser Young; Oisin Lennon; Alan Godfrey; Samuel Stuart
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 11.928

3.  Muscle contributions to fore-aft and vertical body mass center accelerations over a range of running speeds.

Authors:  Samuel R Hamner; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Increased vertical impact forces and altered running mechanics with softer midsole shoes.

Authors:  Jennifer Baltich; Christian Maurer; Benno M Nigg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Coupling of Stride Length and Foot Strike in Running.

Authors:  Missy Thompson; Kristine Hoffman; Lindsay Blythe; Rachel Hasler; Megan Longtain
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-04-12

6.  Heel-toe running: A new look at the influence of foot strike pattern on impact force.

Authors:  John A Mercer; Sarah Horsch
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 3.103

7.  The Effect of a Curved Non-Motorized Treadmill on Running Gait Length, Imbalance and Stride Angle.

Authors:  Andrew Hatchett; Kaitlyn Armstrong; Brian Parr; Mallory Crews; Charlie Tant
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-29

Review 8.  Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis.

Authors:  Lauren C Benson; Anu M Räisänen; Christian A Clermont; Reed Ferber
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.576

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.