Literature DB >> 24431783

Pressure produced on the residual maxillary alveolar ridge by different impression materials and tray design: an in vivo study.

Subash M Reddy1, Chenthil Arun Mohan1, D Vijitha1, R Balasubramanian1, A Satish1, Mahendira Kumar1.   

Abstract

Increased ridge resorption may occur due to inappropriate pressure applied during final impression making phase of complete denture fabrication. This study was done to evaluate the pressure applied on the residual ridge while making impressions with two tray designs (with and without spacer) using, zinc oxide eugenol and light body polyvinyl siloxane impression material. Five edentulous subjects were randomly selected. For each of the five subjects four maxillary final impressions were made and were labelled as, Group A-Impression made with tray without spacer using zinc oxide eugenol impression, Group B-Impression made with tray with spacer using zinc oxide eugenol impression material, Group C-Impression made with tray without spacer using light body polyvinyl siloxane impression material, Group D-Impression made with tray with spacer using light body polyvinyl siloxane impression material. During the impression procedure a closed hydraulic system was used to remotely measure the pressures produced in three areas. The pressure produced were calibrated according to the micro strain record. Statistical comparisons of readings were done using t test and ANOVA. The acquired data revealed that ZOE produced an average pressures value of 26.534 and 72.05 microstrain, while light body PVS produced 11.430 and 37.584 microstrain value with and without spacer respectively. Significantly high values were recorded on the vault of the palate when using trays without spacer. The use of light body polyvinyl siloxane and zinc oxide eugenol impression material showed insignificant difference. Within the limitations of this study, tray design has a significantly effected on the pressures produced, while the impression materials does not have any significant difference.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Impression material; Impression pressure; Residual alveolar ridge; Strain gauge; Tray design

Year:  2012        PMID: 24431783      PMCID: PMC3792318          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-012-0201-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  7 in total

1.  Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs.

Authors:  Radi Masri; Carl F Driscoll; John Burkhardt; Anthony Von Fraunhofer; Elaine Romberg
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Effects of relief space and escape holes on pressure characteristics of maxillary edentulous impressions.

Authors:  Osamu Komiyama; Hiroyuki Saeki; Misao Kawara; Kihei Kobayashi; Shigeo Otake
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Pressure generated on a simulated mandibular oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different design.

Authors:  Adel Al-Ahmad; Radi Masri; Carl F Driscoll; Joseph von Fraunhofer; Elaine Romberg
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  A critical analysis of mid-century impression techniques for full dentures.

Authors:  C O BOUCHER
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1951-07       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Controlling pressures during complete denture impressions.

Authors:  R P Frank
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  1970-07

6.  Analysis of pressures produced during maxillary edentulous impression procedures.

Authors:  R P Frank
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  Pressures involved in making upper edentulous impressions.

Authors:  A Rihani
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 3.426

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Custom double tray for a special impression technique for flabby maxillary residual ridge: Case report.

Authors:  Aisha Zakaria Hashem Mostafa; Sarab Muzil Alanazi; Samaher Mohammad Almarshedy
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-03-17

2.  Microstrain Analysis of Selective Pressure Techniques for Mandibular Complete Denture Impression: An In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Ashish Dadarwal; Jyoti Paliwal; Vineet Sharma; Kamal K Meena; Ramjee L Raigar; Mohini Gaziwala
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.