Literature DB >> 24431752

Comparing the effect of a resin based sealer on crown retention for three types of cements: an in vitro study.

Pankaj Patel1, Mansukh Thummar2, Dipti Shah1, Varun Pitti1.   

Abstract

To determine the effect of resin based sealer on retention of casting cemented with three different luting agents. 55 extracted molar teeth were prepared with a flat occlusal surface, 20° taper and 4 mm axial height. The axial surface of each specimen was determined. The specimen were then distributed into five groups based on decreasing surface area, so each cementation group contained 11 specimens with similar mean axial surface area. A two-step, single bottle universal adhesive system (One-Step-Resinomer, Bisco) was used to seal dentin after the tooth preparation. Sealer was not used on the control specimens except for the modified-resin cement (Resinomer, Bisco) specimens that required use of adhesive with cementation. Using ceramometal (Wirobond(®), BEGO), a casting was produced for each specimen and cemented with either zinc phosphate (Harvard), glass ionomer (Vivaglass) or modified resin cement (Resinomer) with single bottle adhesive. All the castings were cemented with a force of 20 kg. Castings were thermal cycled at 5 and 55 °C for 2,500 cycles and were then removed along the path of insertion using a universal testing machine at 0.5 mm/min. A single-factor ANOVA was used with a = 0.05. The nature of failure was also recorded. The mean stress removal for non sealed zinc phosphate, sealed zinc phosphate, non sealed glass ionomer, sealed glass ionomer and modified resin cement was found to be 3.56, 1.92, 2.40, 4.26, 6.95 MPa respectively. Zinc phosphate cement remained principally on the castings when the tooth surface was treated with the sealer and was found on both the tooth and the casting when the sealer was not used. Fracture of root before dislodgement was seen in 9 of 11 specimens with modified resin cement. Resin sealer decreases the retention of the castings when used with zinc phosphate and increases it when used with glass ionomer cement. The highest mean dislodgement force was measured with modified resin cement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glass ionomer cement; Modified resin cement; Resin based sealer; Retention; Zinc phosphate cement

Year:  2013        PMID: 24431752      PMCID: PMC3732699          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-013-0269-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  20 in total

1.  High and low torque handpieces: cutting dynamics, enamel cracking and tooth temperature.

Authors:  T F Watson; D Flanagan; D G Stone
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2000-06-24       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Effect of the dentin cleansing techniques on dentin wetting and on the bond strength of a resin luting agent.

Authors:  Duygu Sarac; Y Sinasi Sarac; Safak Kulunk; Tolga Kulunk
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  The effects of primers on the sensitivity of dentin.

Authors:  T Watanabe; M Sano; K Itoh; S Wakumoto
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.304

4.  The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.

Authors:  Sillas Duarte; Claudia Regina Buanain de Freitas; José Roberto Cury Saad; Avishai Sadan
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Effect of two dentinal desensitizing agents on retention of complete cast coping using four cements.

Authors:  I K Mausner; G R Goldstein; M Georgescu
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  The taper of clinical preparations for fixed prosthodontics.

Authors:  J Nordlander; D Weir; W Stoffer; S Ochi
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  Inhibition of serum albumin flux across exposed dentine following conditioning with GLUMA primer, glutaraldehyde or potassium oxalates.

Authors:  G Bergenholtz; M Jontell; A Tuttle; G Knutsson
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Desensitizing effects of Gluma and Gluma 2000 on hypersensitive dentin.

Authors:  G Dondi dall'Orologio; S Malferrari
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.522

Review 9.  Dentinal hypersensitivity: a review.

Authors:  Patricia A Walters
Journal:  J Contemp Dent Pract       Date:  2005-05-15

10.  Evaluation of the desensitizing effect of Gluma Dentin Bond on teeth prepared for complete-coverage restorations.

Authors:  D A Felton; G Bergenholtz; B E Kanoy
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.681

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Immediate Dentin Sealing: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Theodora-Kalliopi Samartzi; Dimokritos Papalexopoulos; Aspasia Sarafianou; Stefanos Kourtis
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2021-06-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.