Literature DB >> 24431721

An In vitro Evaluation of Flexural Bond Strength of Indirect Composites Fused to Metal.

N Sunitha1, Padma Ariga1, Ashish R Jain2, Jacob Mathew Philip1.   

Abstract

With the advent of newer indirect composite resin materials for crown and bridge prosthesis, it has become imperative to evaluate their strength to serve as long term replacements as a substitute to metal ceramic restorations. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the flexural bond strength of three composite resin veneering material to metal, cured by different methods. Specimen were fabricated with pattern resin by duplicating it with machined metal die and divided into three groups. Three composite resin materials were used in this study. Group (A) received Adoro, Group (B) received Targis and Group (C) received Tescera. The bond strength of all specimens was tested with Lloyd's universal testing machine under three point loading. The highest values for fracture resistance were displayed by light, heat and pressure cured composites followed by composites cured using a temperature of 104 °C and composites with curing temperature of 95 °C. The results indicate that there is a significant difference between the three groups, with the Tescera group specimens exhibiting the highest flexural bond strength. Of the other two groups, Adoro group exhibited higher flexural bond strength than Targis group. The results of this study suggest that Tescera group with curing temperature of 130 °C and pressure of 80 Psi, cured with metal halide unit exhibited the highest flexural bond strength when compared to Adoro and Targis groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crown and bridge; Flexural bond strength; Indirect composites

Year:  2013        PMID: 24431721      PMCID: PMC3634948          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-013-0271-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  25 in total

1.  The effect of various surface treatments and bonding agents on the repaired strength of heat-treated composites.

Authors:  C Lucena-Martín; S González-López; J M Navajas-Rodríguez de Mondelo
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Marginal adaptation of indirect composites and ceramic inlay systems.

Authors:  Carlos José Soares; Luis Roberto Marcondes Martins; Alfredo Júlio Fernandes Neto; Marcelo Giannini
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.440

Review 3.  Silane based concepts on bonding resin composite to metals.

Authors:  Jukka P Matinlinna; Pekka K Vallittu
Journal:  J Contemp Dent Pract       Date:  2007-02-01

Review 4.  Second generation laboratory composite resins for indirect restorations.

Authors:  B Touati; N Aidan
Journal:  J Esthet Dent       Date:  1997

5.  Effect of surface treatments of laboratory-fabricated composites on the microtensile bond strength to a luting resin cement.

Authors:  Carlos José Soares; Marcelo Giannini; Marcelo Tavares de Oliveira; Luis Alexandre Maffei Sartini Paulillo; Luis Roberto Marcondes Martins
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Hardness and compressive strength of indirect composite resins: effects of immersion in distilled water.

Authors:  A Da Fonte Porto Carreiro; C A Dos Santos Cruz; C E Vergani
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.837

7.  Edge strength of indirect restorative materials.

Authors:  Nadia Ereifej; Nick Silikas; David C Watts
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Effect of surface characteristics on adherence of S. mutans biofilms to indirect resin composites.

Authors:  Masaomi Ikeda; Khairul Matin; Toru Nikaido; Richard M Foxton; Junji Tagami
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Relationship between sandblasting and composite resin-alloy bond strength by a silica coating.

Authors:  M Mukai; H Fukui; J Hasegawa
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Bond strength of photocured composite resin facings: clinical versus laboratory procedures.

Authors:  M Zalkind; J Slavik; E Raviv; N Stern
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.837

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.