Literature DB >> 24431671

Efficacy, user acceptability, tolerability, and cycle control of a combined contraceptive vaginal ring: the Indian perspective.

Anita Soni1, Seeru Garg1, Rani Bangar1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the contraceptive efficacy, user acceptability, cycle control, and tolerability of a combined contraceptive vaginal ring for up to 13 cycles.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Healthy women coming to the OPD for contraceptive advice were enrolled in this one-year study. Each ring was used for three weeks followed by a one-week ring-free period.
RESULTS: A total of 184 women started treatment forming the intent to treat population. Subjects were followed for 13 cycles. Compliance was good with 99 % of cycles in full compliance with specified criteria. In the intent to treat population, no pregnancies occurred giving a Pearl Index of 0. The mean incidence of withdrawal bleeding was 99 % in all cycles. There was 0.16 % incidence of intermenstrual bleeding and 2 % incidence of early withdrawal bleeding. The ring was well tolerated with a low incidence of adverse events.
CONCLUSION: The ring is an effective contraceptive that is convenient, well tolerated with excellent cycle control, and highly acceptable to users.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Combined vaginal contraceptive ring; Cycle control; Efficacy

Year:  2013        PMID: 24431671      PMCID: PMC3798445          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-013-0391-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  14 in total

1.  Use of the novel combined contraceptive vaginal ring NuvaRing for ovulation inhibition.

Authors:  T M Mulders; T O Dieben
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Pharmacokinetics of etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol released from a combined contraceptive vaginal ring.

Authors:  C J Timmer; T M Mulders
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Effect on carbohydrate metabolism and analysis of acceptability (menstrual cycle control) of extended regimens of the vaginally inserted hormone-releasing system 'NuvaRing' as compared with the standard 21/7 regime in reproductive-age women with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Elena E Grodnitskaya; Olga R Grigoryan; Elena V Klinyshkova; Elena N Andreeva; Galina A Melnichenko; Ivan I Dedov
Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.260

4.  Effects on cycle control and bodyweight of the combined contraceptive ring, NuvaRing, versus an oral contraceptive containing 30 microg ethinyl estradiol and 3 mg drospirenone.

Authors:  I Milsom; I Lete; A Bjertnaes; K Rokstad; I Lindh; C J Gruber; M H Birkhäuser; E Aubeny; T Knudsen; C Bastianelli
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Efficacy and safety of a contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing) compared with a combined oral contraceptive: a 1-year randomized trial.

Authors:  Kristjan Oddsson; Beate Leifels-Fischer; Nilson Roberto de Melo; Dominique Wiel-Masson; Chiara Benedetto; Carole H J Verhoeven; Thom O M Dieben
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 6.  New progestogens in oral contraception.

Authors:  K Fotherby; A D Caldwell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Causes and consequences of oral contraceptive noncompliance.

Authors:  M Rosenberg; M S Waugh
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Efficacy, cycle control, and user acceptability of a novel combined contraceptive vaginal ring.

Authors:  Thom O M Dieben; Frans J M E Roumen; Dan Apter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  An open-label, multicentre trial to evaluate the vaginal bleeding pattern of the combined contraceptive vaginal ring NuvaRing.

Authors:  Vincenzina Bruni; Valentina Pontello; Stefano Luisi; Felice Petraglia
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 2.435

10.  Use and misuse of oral contraceptives: risk indicators for poor pill taking and discontinuation.

Authors:  M J Rosenberg; M S Waugh; T E Meehan
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  7 in total

1.  A Qualitative Systematic Review of Women's Experiences Using Contraceptive Vaginal Rings: Implications for New Technologies.

Authors:  Sara E Vargas; Miriam M Midoun; Melissa Guillen; Melissa L Getz; Kristen Underhill; Caroline Kuo; Kate M Guthrie
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2019-05-20

2.  Vaginal ring acceptability: A systematic review and meta-analysis of vaginal ring experiences from around the world.

Authors:  Kathleen Ridgeway; Elizabeth T Montgomery; Kevin Smith; Kristine Torjesen; Ariane van der Straten; Sharon L Achilles; Jennifer B Griffin
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2021-10-10       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Multicenter Study of Contraceptive Vaginal Ring (NuvaRing(®)) in Normal Daily Practice in Indian Women.

Authors:  Suchitra N Pandit; Anahita R Chauhan; Manjula Anagani; Sanjeeva Reddy; Ashish Birla; Subrat K Ray
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-05-15

4.  High acceptability of a contraceptive vaginal ring among women in Kigali, Rwanda.

Authors:  Evelyne Kestelyn; Jennifer Ilo Van Nuil; Marie Michelle Umulisa; Grace Umutoni; Alice Uwingabire; Lambert Mwambarangwe; Mireille Uwineza; Stephen Agaba; Tania Crucitti; Janneke van de Wijgert; Thérèse Delvaux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Vaginal ring acceptability and related preferences among women in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Jennifer B Griffin; Kathleen Ridgeway; Elizabeth Montgomery; Kristine Torjesen; Rachel Clark; Jill Peterson; Rachel Baggaley; Ariane van der Straten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Acceptability and Satisfaction of Contraceptive Vaginal Rings in Clinical Studies: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Authors:  Thérèse Delvaux; Vicky Jespers; Lenka Benova; Janneke van de Wijgert
Journal:  Front Glob Womens Health       Date:  2021-12-14

Review 7.  Barriers and Enablers Influencing Women's Adoption and Continuation of Vaginally Inserted Contraceptive Methods: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Danielle M Harris; Anita Dam; Kate Morrison; Chastain Mann; Ashley Jackson; Shannon M Bledsoe; Andrea Rowan; Kim Longfield
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2022-08-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.