Joe D Piper1, Daniel B Hawcutt2, George K Verghese1, Stefan Spinty1, Paul Newland3, Richard Appleton4. 1. Department of Neurology, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, UK. 2. Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. 3. Department of Clinical Chemistry, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, UK. 4. Department of Neurology, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, UK Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Phenytoin has complex pharmacokinetics. The intravenous loading dose of phenytoin for children in status epilepticus has recently been increased from 18 to 20 mg/kg. There are no data on the clinical effectiveness and safety of this new dose. METHODS: The use of intravenous loading doses of phenytoin was audited over 27 months to evaluate the pharmacokinetic, clinical and toxic effects of the new dose in clinical practice. Serum phenytoin concentrations were compared with dose (weight-adjusted) and time. RESULTS: Serum phenytoin concentrations were measured on 48 occasions from 41 children (39 retrospective and 9 prospective), of which 24 were within 60-180 (median 105) minutes following completion of infusion of the loading dose. Use of estimated weights meant patients received between 15.5 and 27.5 mg/kg (78% to 138% expected dose). Supra-therapeutic serum concentrations >20 µg/mL were present in 5/24 (20.1%) (after doses based on actual weight in three and estimated weight in two patients). Three adverse effects consistent with phenytoin toxicity were noted in children with supra-therapeutic concentrations. Two errors in dose prescriptions were found. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of serum phenytoin concentrations were in the therapeutic range. Estimating weight in children for the 20 mg/kg intravenous loading dose of phenytoin is often clinically necessary but inaccurate, resulting in up to 138% of the expected and recommended dose in this cohort. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
INTRODUCTION:Phenytoin has complex pharmacokinetics. The intravenous loading dose of phenytoin for children in status epilepticus has recently been increased from 18 to 20 mg/kg. There are no data on the clinical effectiveness and safety of this new dose. METHODS: The use of intravenous loading doses of phenytoin was audited over 27 months to evaluate the pharmacokinetic, clinical and toxic effects of the new dose in clinical practice. Serum phenytoin concentrations were compared with dose (weight-adjusted) and time. RESULTS: Serum phenytoin concentrations were measured on 48 occasions from 41 children (39 retrospective and 9 prospective), of which 24 were within 60-180 (median 105) minutes following completion of infusion of the loading dose. Use of estimated weights meant patients received between 15.5 and 27.5 mg/kg (78% to 138% expected dose). Supra-therapeutic serum concentrations >20 µg/mL were present in 5/24 (20.1%) (after doses based on actual weight in three and estimated weight in two patients). Three adverse effects consistent with phenytointoxicity were noted in children with supra-therapeutic concentrations. Two errors in dose prescriptions were found. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of serum phenytoin concentrations were in the therapeutic range. Estimating weight in children for the 20 mg/kg intravenous loading dose of phenytoin is often clinically necessary but inaccurate, resulting in up to 138% of the expected and recommended dose in this cohort. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Authors: Richard E Appleton; Naomi Ea Rainford; Carrol Gamble; Shrouk Messahel; Amy Humphreys; Helen Hickey; Kerry Woolfall; Louise Roper; Joanne Noblet; Elizabeth Lee; Sarah Potter; Paul Tate; Nadia Al Najjar; Anand Iyer; Vicki Evans; Mark D Lyttle Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Abhishek G Sathe; Usha Mishra; Vijay Ivaturi; Richard C Brundage; James C Cloyd; Jordan J Elm; James M Chamberlain; Robert Silbergleit; Jaideep Kapur; Daniel H Lowenstein; Shlomo Shinnar; Hannah R Cock; Nathan B Fountain; Lynn Babcock; Lisa D Coles Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Mark D Lyttle; Carrol Gamble; Shrouk Messahel; Helen Hickey; Anand Iyer; Kerry Woolfall; Amy Humphreys; Naomi E A Bacon; Louise Roper; Franz E Babl; Stuart R Dalziel; Mary Ryan; Richard E Appleton Journal: Trials Date: 2017-06-19 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Abhishek G Sathe; Richard C Brundage; Vijay Ivaturi; James C Cloyd; James M Chamberlain; Jordan J Elm; Robert Silbergleit; Jaideep Kapur; Lisa D Coles Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 4.689