OBJECTIVE: Emotional eating (EE) reflects an urge to eat in response to emotional rather than physical cues and is a risk factor for the development of binge eating. EE has been conceptualized as an attempt to regulate negative affect (NA), a posited maintenance factor for binge eating. However, no study has examined whether EE urges regulate affect. Further, no studies have examined longitudinal associations between EE urges and positive affect (PA). METHOD: We examined within-subject longitudinal associations between affect and EE urges in a community-based sample of female twins (mean age = 17.8 years). Participants (N = 239) completed ratings of affect and EE urges for 45 consecutive days. RESULTS: Greater NA was concurrently associated with greater EE urges. Additionally, greater EE urges predicted worse NA for both concurrent and prospective (next-day) analyses. Finally, lower PA was associated with greater EE urges in concurrent analyses, but there were no prospective associations between changes in PA and EE urges. DISCUSSION: EE urges do not appear to effectively regulate affect. EE urges in a community-based sample appear to have the same functional relationship with affect as binge eating in clinical samples, further supporting EE as a useful dimensional construct for examining processes related to binge eating.
OBJECTIVE:Emotional eating (EE) reflects an urge to eat in response to emotional rather than physical cues and is a risk factor for the development of binge eating. EE has been conceptualized as an attempt to regulate negative affect (NA), a posited maintenance factor for binge eating. However, no study has examined whether EE urges regulate affect. Further, no studies have examined longitudinal associations between EE urges and positive affect (PA). METHOD: We examined within-subject longitudinal associations between affect and EE urges in a community-based sample of female twins (mean age = 17.8 years). Participants (N = 239) completed ratings of affect and EE urges for 45 consecutive days. RESULTS: Greater NA was concurrently associated with greater EE urges. Additionally, greater EE urges predicted worse NA for both concurrent and prospective (next-day) analyses. Finally, lower PA was associated with greater EE urges in concurrent analyses, but there were no prospective associations between changes in PA and EE urges. DISCUSSION: EE urges do not appear to effectively regulate affect. EE urges in a community-based sample appear to have the same functional relationship with affect as binge eating in clinical samples, further supporting EE as a useful dimensional construct for examining processes related to binge eating.
Authors: Tyler B Mason; Carly R Pacanowski; Jason M Lavender; Ross D Crosby; Stephen A Wonderlich; Scott G Engel; James E Mitchell; Scott J Crow; Carol B Peterson Journal: Assessment Date: 2017-07-13
Authors: Megan E Mikhail; Pamela K Keel; S Alexandra Burt; Michael Neale; Steven Boker; Kelly L Klump Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Brittney C Evans; Julia W Felton; Madeline A Lagacey; Stephanie M Manasse; Carl W Lejuez; Adrienne S Juarascio Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Kelly L Klump; Pamela K Keel; S Alexandra Burt; Sarah E Racine; Michael C Neale; Cheryl L Sisk; Steven Boker Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2013-01-11 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Sarah E Racine; Pamela K Keel; S Alexandra Burt; Cheryl L Sisk; Michael Neale; Steven Boker; Kelly L Klump Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2013-01-28
Authors: Sarah E Racine; Pamela K Keel; S Alexandra Burt; Cheryl L Sisk; Michael Neale; Steven Boker; Kelly L Klump Journal: Eat Behav Date: 2013-02-26
Authors: Leqin Fang; Xiaoheng Xu; Xiaomin Lin; Yanlin Chen; Fuying Zheng; Yanrou Bei; Lu Zhang; Bin Zhang Journal: Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao Date: 2019-12-30