OBJECTIVES: Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) strategies represent a new frontier in lung transplantation technology, and there have been many clinical studies of EVLP in lung transplantation. The establishment of a reliable EVLP model in small animals is crucial to facilitating translational research using an EVLP strategy. The main objective of this study was to develop a reproducible rat EVLP (R-EVLP) model that enables prolonged evaluation of the explanted lung during EVLP and successful transplantation after EVLP. METHODS: The donor heart-lung blocks were procured with cold low-potassium dextran solution and immersed in the solution for 1 h at 4 °C. And then, the heart-lung blocks were flushed retrogradely and warmed up to 37 °C in a circuit perfused antegradely with acellular perfusate. The perfusate was deoxygenated with a gas mixture (6% O2, 8% CO2, 86% N2). The perfusion flow was maintained at 20% of the entire cardiac output. At 37 °C, the lungs were mechanically ventilated and perfusion continued for 4 h. Every hour, the perfused lung was evaluated for gas exchange, dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). RESULTS: R-EVLP was performed for 4 h. Pulmonary oxygenation ability (pO2/pCO2) was stable for 4 h during EVLP. It was noted that Cdyn and PVR were also stable. After 4 h of EVLP, pO2 was 303 ± 19 mmHg, pCO2 was 39.6 ± 1.2 mmHg, PVR was 1.75 ± 0.10 mmHg/ml/min and Cdyn was 0.37 ± 0.03 ml/cmH2O. Lungs that were transplanted after 2 h of R-EVLP resulted in significantly better post-transplant oxygenation and compliance when compared with those after standard cold static preservation. CONCLUSIONS: Our R-EVLP model maintained stable lung oxygenation, compliance and vascular resistance for up to 4 h of perfusion duration. This reliable model should facilitate further advancement of experimental work using EVLP.
OBJECTIVES: Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) strategies represent a new frontier in lung transplantation technology, and there have been many clinical studies of EVLP in lung transplantation. The establishment of a reliable EVLP model in small animals is crucial to facilitating translational research using an EVLP strategy. The main objective of this study was to develop a reproducible ratEVLP (R-EVLP) model that enables prolonged evaluation of the explanted lung during EVLP and successful transplantation after EVLP. METHODS: The donorheart-lung blocks were procured with cold low-potassium dextran solution and immersed in the solution for 1 h at 4 °C. And then, the heart-lung blocks were flushed retrogradely and warmed up to 37 °C in a circuit perfused antegradely with acellular perfusate. The perfusate was deoxygenated with a gas mixture (6% O2, 8% CO2, 86% N2). The perfusion flow was maintained at 20% of the entire cardiac output. At 37 °C, the lungs were mechanically ventilated and perfusion continued for 4 h. Every hour, the perfused lung was evaluated for gas exchange, dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). RESULTS: R-EVLP was performed for 4 h. Pulmonary oxygenation ability (pO2/pCO2) was stable for 4 h during EVLP. It was noted that Cdyn and PVR were also stable. After 4 h of EVLP, pO2 was 303 ± 19 mmHg, pCO2 was 39.6 ± 1.2 mmHg, PVR was 1.75 ± 0.10 mmHg/ml/min and Cdyn was 0.37 ± 0.03 ml/cmH2O. Lungs that were transplanted after 2 h of R-EVLP resulted in significantly better post-transplant oxygenation and compliance when compared with those after standard cold static preservation. CONCLUSIONS: Our R-EVLP model maintained stable lung oxygenation, compliance and vascular resistance for up to 4 h of perfusion duration. This reliable model should facilitate further advancement of experimental work using EVLP.
Entities:
Keywords:
Ex vivo lung perfusion; Lung transplantation; Organ preservation
Authors: Jared P Beller; Matthew R Byler; Dustin T Money; William Z Chancellor; Aimee Zhang; Yunge Zhao; Mark H Stoler; Adishesh K Narahari; Alexander Shannon; J Hunter Mehaffey; Curtis G Tribble; Victor E Laubach; Irving L Kron; Mark E Roeser Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Vibha N Lama; John A Belperio; Jason D Christie; Souheil El-Chemaly; Michael C Fishbein; Andrew E Gelman; Wayne W Hancock; Shaf Keshavjee; Daniel Kreisel; Victor E Laubach; Mark R Looney; John F McDyer; Thalachallour Mohanakumar; Rebecca A Shilling; Angela Panoskaltsis-Mortari; David S Wilkes; Jerry P Eu; Mark R Nicolls Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2017-05-04
Authors: Judith E van Zanden; Henri G D Leuvenink; Erik A M Verschuuren; Zwanida J Veldhuis; Petra J Ottens; Michiel E Erasmus; Maximilia C Hottenrott Journal: Transplant Direct Date: 2021-03-16
Authors: Kevin Nelson; Christopher Bobba; Emre Eren; Tyler Spata; Malak Tadres; Don Hayes; Sylvester M Black; Samir Ghadiali; Bryan A Whitson Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Judith E van Zanden; Henri G D Leuvenink; Erik A M Verschuuren; Michiel E Erasmus; Maximilia C Hottenrott Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-12-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Robert P Davis; John Yerxa; Qimeng Gao; Jared Gloria; Uwe Scheuermann; Mingqing Song; Min Zhang; William Parker; Jaewoo Lee; Matthew G Hartwig; Andrew S Barbas Journal: Transplant Direct Date: 2020-02-10
Authors: Kentaro Noda; Brian J Philips; Mark E Snyder; Julie A Phillippi; Mara Sullivan; Donna B Stolz; Xi Ren; James D Luketich; Pablo G Sanchez Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 4.379