Literature DB >> 24430800

Simulation of mammographic breast compression in 3D MR images using ICP-based B-spline deformation for multimodality breast cancer diagnosis.

Julia Krüger1, Jan Ehrhardt, Arpad Bischof, Heinz Handels.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Multimodality mammography using conventional 2D mammography and dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is frequently performed for breast cancer detection and diagnosis. Combination of both imaging modalities requires superimposition of corresponding structures in mammograms and MR images. This task is challenging due to large differences in (1) dimensionality and spatial resolution, (2) variations in tissue contrast, as well as (3) differences in breast orientation and deformation during the image acquisition. A new method for multimodality breast image registration was developed and tested.
METHODS: Combined diagnosis of mammograms and MRI datasets was achieved by simulation of mammographic breast compression to overcome large differences in breast deformation. Surface information was extracted from the 3D MR image, and back-projection of the 2D breast contour in the mammogram was done. B-spline-based 3D/3D surface-based registration was then used to approximate mammographic breast compression. This breast deformation simulation was performed on 14 MRI datasets with 19 corresponding mammograms. The results were evaluated by comparison with distances between corresponding structures identified by an expert observer.
RESULTS: The evaluation revealed an average distance of 6.46 mm between corresponding structures, when an optimized initial alignment between both image datasets is performed. Without the optimization, the accuracy is 9.12 mm.
CONCLUSION: A new surface-based method that approximates the mammographic deformation due to breast compression without using a specific complex model needed for finite-element-based methods was developed and tested with favorable results. The simulated compression can serve as foundation for a point-to-line correspondence between 2D mammograms and 3D MR image data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24430800     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-014-0976-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  9 in total

1.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  D Rueckert; L I Sonoda; C Hayes; D L Hill; M O Leach; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Volume-preserving nonrigid registration of MR breast images using free-form deformation with an incompressibility constraint.

Authors:  Torsten Rohlfing; Calvin R Maurer; David A Bluemke; Michael A Jacobs
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  MRI to X-ray mammography registration using a volume-preserving affine transformation.

Authors:  Thomy Mertzanidou; John Hipwell; M Jorge Cardoso; Xiying Zhang; Christine Tanner; Sebastien Ourselin; Ulrich Bick; Henkjan Huisman; Nico Karssemeijer; David Hawkes
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  A new validation method for X-ray mammogram registration algorithms using a projection model of breast X-ray compression.

Authors:  John H Hipwell; Christine Tanner; William R Crum; Julia A Schnabel; David J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Computer-aided identification of the pectoral muscle in digitized mammograms.

Authors:  K Santle Camilus; V K Govindan; P S Sathidevi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Automatic multimodal 2D/3D breast image registration using biomechanical FEM models and intensity-based optimization.

Authors:  T Hopp; M Dietzel; P A Baltzer; P Kreisel; W A Kaiser; H Gemmeke; N V Ruiter
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Segmentation of the pectoral muscle in breast MRI using atlas-based approaches.

Authors:  Albert Gubern-Mérida; Michiel Kallenberg; Robert Martí; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2012

8.  Fusion of contrast-enhanced breast MR and mammographic imaging data.

Authors:  Christian P Behrenbruch; Kostas Marias; Paul A Armitage; Margaret Yam; Niall Moore; Ruth E English; Jane Clarke; Michael Brady
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 8.545

9.  Semiautomated multimodal breast image registration.

Authors:  Charlotte Curtis; Richard Frayne; Elise Fear
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2012-02-01
  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Medical image computing and image-based simulation: recent developments and advances in Germany.

Authors:  Heinz Handels; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Thomas M Deserno; Thomas Tolxdorff
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  An Anthropometric-Based Subject-Specific Finite Element Model of the Human Breast for Predicting Large Deformations.

Authors:  Silvia Pianigiani; Leonardo Ruggiero; Bernardo Innocenti
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-12-24

Review 3.  Photoacoustic imaging of breast cancer: a mini review of system design and image features.

Authors:  Nikhila Nyayapathi; Jun Xia
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.170

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.