Literature DB >> 24430718

Safety of pedicle screws and spinal instrumentation for pediatric patients: comparative analysis between 0- and 5-year-old, 5- and 10-year-old, and 10- and 15-year-old patients.

Takahito Fujimori1, Burt Yaszay, Carrie E Bartley, Tracey P Bastrom, Peter O Newton.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety of pedicle screws and constructs for infantile and juvenile patients with spinal deformity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few studies have examined the safety and complication rates associated with the usage of pedicle screw for children younger than 10 years.
METHODS: Radiographical and clinical data were collected of patients treated with pedicle screws at a single institution. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on age (0-5 yr old, 5-10 yr) and compared with an older cohort of 10- to 15-year-old patients. Patient demographics, screw adjustment, and complication data were collected for each group. Outcomes were analyzed using analysis of variance (P < 0.05).
RESULTS: In total, 5054 pedicle screws were analyzed: 176 in the 0- to 5-year-old group (31 patients), 659 in the 5- to 10-year-old group (68 patients), and 4219 in the 10- to 15-year-old group (234 patients). Mean follow-up was 3.1 ± 1.8 years (range, 3 mo-9 yr). There were 7 pedicle screw-associated complications (3 required revision surgery). Overall pedicle screw-associated complication rates were 2.1% per patient and 0.1% per screw. There were no neurological complications associated with misplacement of a pedicle screw. The pedicle screw-associated complication rates per patient and per screw were 3.2% and 0.6% in the 0- to 5-year-old group, 2.9% and 0.3% in the 5- to 10-year-old group, and 1.7% and 0.1% in the 10- to 15-year-old group (P > 0.05). The 5- to 10-year-old group had a significantly higher overall surgically related complication rate (34%) than the 0- to 5-year-old group (7%) and the 10- to 15-year-old group (6%) (P = 0.005), primarily due to the "growth friendly" constructs common in this age group.
CONCLUSION: Pedicle screws can be used for infantile or juvenile patients, although complication rates associated with pedicle screws tended to be slightly higher in the younger groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24430718     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  4 in total

1.  Comparative Analysis of Interval, Skipped, and Key-vertebral Pedicle Screw Strategies for Correction in Patients With Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Fei Wang; Xi-Ming Xu; Yanghu Lu; Xian-Zhao Wei; Xiao-Dong Zhu; Ming Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

2.  Increased Radiation but No Benefits in Pedicle Screw Accuracy With Navigation versus a Freehand Technique in Scoliosis Surgery.

Authors:  Wiktor Urbanski; Wojciech Jurasz; Michal Wolanczyk; Miroslaw Kulej; Piotr Morasiewicz; Szymon Lukasz Dragan; Rafal Zaluski; Grzegorz Miekisiak; Szymon Feliks Dragan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Three-dimensional digitizing and anatomic study of lumbar vertebral canal and pedicle in children.

Authors:  Xing Wang; Shao-Jie Zhang; Yuan-Zhi Zhang; Xiao-He Li; Zhi-Feng Zhang; Chao-Qun Wang; Shang Gao; Jun Shi; Zhi-Jun Li
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 1.195

4.  Pedicle Screw Placement in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Comparison between Robotics Coupled with Navigation versus the Freehand Technique.

Authors:  Gabriel S Linden; Semhal Ghessese; Danielle Cook; Daniel J Hedequist
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.847

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.