Literature DB >> 2443001

Comparison of keratin monoclonal antibodies MAK-6, AE1:AE3, and CAM-5.2.

M B Listrom, L W Dalton.   

Abstract

Two routinely used antikeratin monoclonal antibodies, AE1:AE3 (Hybritech Inc., La Jolla, CA) and CAM-5.2 (Becton-Dickinson, Mountain View, CA), were compared with a new antikeratin monoclonal antibody mixture, MAK-6 (Triton Biosciences, Inc., Alameda, CA). Various poorly differentiated epithelial neoplasms, lymphomas, melanomas, and sarcomas were studied with the use of the avidin-biotin-peroxidase technic. All three antibodies had similar staining profiles, however, some differences were noted. The MAK-6 and CAM-5.2 antibodies illustrated stronger staining for some grade III transitional cell carcinomas, whereas the AE1:AE3 was variably positive to negative in all cases. Three renal cell carcinomas were positive with all three antibodies, two were negative with all three, and one had scattered positive cells with MAK-6 only. All lymphomas and plasmacytomas were negative with MAK-6 and CAM-5.2, however, AE1:AE3 faintly stained two of three plasmacytomas and two of the seven large cell lymphomas. Two out of three hepatomas evaluated were strongly positive with CAM-5.2 and MAK-6 and variably positive with AE1:AE3. The third case had both positive and negative cells with all three antibodies. In conclusion, MAK-6 antikeratin antibody is as useful as AE1:AE3 and CAM-5.2 for identification of poorly differentiated epithelial neoplasms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2443001     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/88.3.297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  8 in total

1.  Immunohistochemistry of cytokeratin proteins in squamous and transitional cell lesions of the urinary tract.

Authors:  M F Tungekar; K C Gatter; M S Al-Adnani
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Immunohistochemical analysis of E-cadherin, alpha-catenin, beta-catenin, gamma-catenin, and neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) in chordoma.

Authors:  T Naka; Y Oda; Y Iwamoto; N Shinohara; H Chuman; M Fukui; M Tsuneyoshi
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Renal collecting duct carcinoma in an 8-year-old child.

Authors:  R D Craver; H Correa; J P Crapanzano; S R Kumar; R V Gardner
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  Are we ready for the use of intraoperative salvaged blood in metastatic spine tumour surgery?

Authors:  Naresh Kumar; Qasim Ahmed; Victor K M Lee; Aye Sandar Zaw; Raymond Goy; Hee Kit Wong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor-C correlates with lymph node micrometastasis in submucosal esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Masataka Matsumoto; Shoji Natsugoe; Hiroshi Okumura; Hideo Arima; Shigehiro Yanagita; Yasuto Uchikado; Naoya Yokomakura; Tetsuro Setoyama; Sumiya Ishigami; Sonshin Takao; Takashi Aikou
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Micrometastases from squamous cell carcinoma in neck dissection specimens.

Authors:  M W van den Brekel; H V Stel; P van der Valk; I van der Waal; C J Meyer; G B Snow
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  An immunohistochemical and prognostic analysis of cytokeratin expression in malignant uveal melanoma.

Authors:  U Fuchs; T Kivelä; P Summanen; I Immonen; A Tarkkanen
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  The distribution of immunomodulatory cells in the lungs of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Authors:  Gerard J Nuovo; James S Hagood; Cynthia M Magro; Nena Chin; Rubina Kapil; Luke Davis; Clay B Marsh; Virginia A Folcik
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 7.842

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.