Colin Powell1, Ruwanthi Kolamunnage-Dona2, John Lowe3, Angela Boland4, Stavros Petrou5, Iolo Doull6, Kerenza Hood7, Paula Williamson2. 1. School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. Electronic address: powellc7@cardiff.ac.uk. 2. Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. 3. School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK; Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. 4. Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. 5. Department of Public Health, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK. 6. Department of Respiratory Paediatrics, Children's Hospital for Wales, Cardiff, UK. 7. School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little evidence is available for the effect of nebulised magnesium sulphate (MgSO(4)) in acute asthma in children. We assessed the effect of MgSO(4) treatment in children with severe acute asthma. METHODS: In this randomised placebo-controlled, multi-centre, parallel trial, we enrolled children (aged 2-16 years) with severe acute asthma who did not respond to standard inhaled treatment from 30 hospitals in the UK. Children were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive nebulised salbutamol and ipratropium bromide with either 2·5 mL of isotonic MgSO(4) (250 mmol/L; 151 mg per dose; MgSO(4) group) or 2·5 mL of isotonic saline (placebo group) on three occasions at 20-min intervals. Randomisation was done with a computer-generated randomisation sequence, with random block sizes of two to four. Both patients and researchers were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome measure was the Yung Asthma Severity Score (ASS) at 60 min post-randomisation. We used a statistical significance level of p<0·05 for a between-group difference, but regarded a between-group difference in ASS of 0·5 as the minimal clinically significant treatment effect. Analysis was done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with controlled-trials.com, number ISRCTN81456894. FINDINGS:Between Jan 3, 2009, and March 20, 2011, we recruited and randomly assigned 508 children to treatment: 252 to MgSO(4) and 256 toplacebo. Mean ASS at 60 min was lower in the MgSO(4) group (4·72 [SD 1·37]) than it was in the placebo group (4·95 [SD 1·40]; adjusted difference -0·25, 95% CI -0·48 to -0·02; p=0·03). This difference, however, was not clinically significant. The clinical effect was larger in children with more severe asthma exacerbation (p=0·03) and those with symptoms present for less than 6 h (p=0·049). We detected no difference in the occurrence of adverse events between groups. INTERPRETATION: Overall, nebulised isotonic MgSO(4), given as an adjuvant to standard treatment, did not show a clinically significant improvement in mean ASS in children with acute severe asthma. However, the greatest clinical response was seen in children with more severe attacks (SaO(2)<92%) at presentation and those with preceding symptoms lasting less than 6 h. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Little evidence is available for the effect of nebulised magnesium sulphate (MgSO(4)) in acute asthma in children. We assessed the effect of MgSO(4) treatment in children with severe acute asthma. METHODS: In this randomised placebo-controlled, multi-centre, parallel trial, we enrolled children (aged 2-16 years) with severe acute asthma who did not respond to standard inhaled treatment from 30 hospitals in the UK. Children were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive nebulised salbutamol and ipratropium bromide with either 2·5 mL of isotonic MgSO(4) (250 mmol/L; 151 mg per dose; MgSO(4) group) or 2·5 mL of isotonic saline (placebo group) on three occasions at 20-min intervals. Randomisation was done with a computer-generated randomisation sequence, with random block sizes of two to four. Both patients and researchers were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome measure was the Yung Asthma Severity Score (ASS) at 60 min post-randomisation. We used a statistical significance level of p<0·05 for a between-group difference, but regarded a between-group difference in ASS of 0·5 as the minimal clinically significant treatment effect. Analysis was done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with controlled-trials.com, number ISRCTN81456894. FINDINGS: Between Jan 3, 2009, and March 20, 2011, we recruited and randomly assigned 508 children to treatment: 252 to MgSO(4) and 256 to placebo. Mean ASS at 60 min was lower in the MgSO(4) group (4·72 [SD 1·37]) than it was in the placebo group (4·95 [SD 1·40]; adjusted difference -0·25, 95% CI -0·48 to -0·02; p=0·03). This difference, however, was not clinically significant. The clinical effect was larger in children with more severe asthma exacerbation (p=0·03) and those with symptoms present for less than 6 h (p=0·049). We detected no difference in the occurrence of adverse events between groups. INTERPRETATION: Overall, nebulised isotonic MgSO(4), given as an adjuvant to standard treatment, did not show a clinically significant improvement in mean ASS in children with acute severe asthma. However, the greatest clinical response was seen in children with more severe attacks (SaO(2)<92%) at presentation and those with preceding symptoms lasting less than 6 h. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme.
Authors: Rachel Knightly; Stephen J Milan; Rodney Hughes; Jennifer A Knopp-Sihota; Brian H Rowe; Rebecca Normansell; Colin Powell Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-11-28
Authors: Mohamed S Al-Moamary; Sami A Alhaider; Abdullah A Alangari; Mohammed O Al Ghobain; Mohammed O Zeitouni; Majdy M Idrees; Abdullah F Alanazi; Adel S Al-Harbi; Abdullah A Yousef; Hassan S Alorainy; Mohamed S Al-Hajjaj Journal: Ann Thorac Med Date: 2019 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 2.219
Authors: Suzanne Schuh; Judy Sweeney; Maggie Rumantir; Allan L Coates; Andrew R Willan; Derek Stephens; Eshetu G Atenafu; Yaron Finkelstein; Graham Thompson; Roger Zemek; Amy C Plint; Jocelyn Gravel; Francine M Ducharme; David W Johnson; Karen Black; Sarah Curtis; Darcy Beer; Terry P Klassen; Darcy Nicksy; Stephen B Freedman Journal: JAMA Date: 2020-11-24 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ruwanthi Kolamunnage-Dona; Sarah Berhane; Harry Potts; Edward H Williams; James Tanner; Tobias Janowitz; Matthew Hoare; Philip Johnson Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 30.083
Authors: James W Antoon; Matt Hall; Vineeta Mittal; Kavita Parikh; Rustin B Morse; Ronald J Teufel; Alexander H Hogan; Samir S Shah; Chén C Kenyon Journal: Hosp Pediatr Date: 2021-07-01
Authors: Suzanne Schuh; Stephen B Freedman; Roger Zemek; Amy C Plint; David W Johnson; Francine Ducharme; Jocelyn Gravel; Graham Thompson; Sarah Curtis; Derek Stephens; Allan L Coates; Karen J Black; Darcy Beer; Judy Sweeney; Maggie Rumantir; Yaron Finkelstein Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-07-01