| Literature DB >> 24428818 |
Ali H Pourasl, Mohammad Taghi Ahmadi, Meisam Rahmani, Huei Chaeng Chin, Cheng Siong Lim, Razali Ismail, Michael Loong Peng Tan1.
Abstract
In recent years, carbon nanotubes have received widespread attention as promising carbon-based nanoelectronic devices. Due to their exceptional physical, chemical, and electrical properties, namely a high surface-to-volume ratio, their enhanced electron transfer properties, and their high thermal conductivity, carbon nanotubes can be used effectively as electrochemical sensors. The integration of carbon nanotubes with a functional group provides a good and solid support for the immobilization of enzymes. The determination of glucose levels using biosensors, particularly in the medical diagnostics and food industries, is gaining mass appeal. Glucose biosensors detect the glucose molecule by catalyzing glucose to gluconic acid and hydrogen peroxide in the presence of oxygen. This action provides high accuracy and a quick detection rate. In this paper, a single-wall carbon nanotube field-effect transistor biosensor for glucose detection is analytically modeled. In the proposed model, the glucose concentration is presented as a function of gate voltage. Subsequently, the proposed model is compared with existing experimental data. A good consensus between the model and the experimental data is reported. The simulated data demonstrate that the analytical model can be employed with an electrochemical glucose sensor to predict the behavior of the sensing mechanism in biosensors.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24428818 PMCID: PMC3898395 DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-33
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Figure 1Schematic fabrication process and a field-effect sensor. (a) Schematic fabrication process of glucose sensor [24]. (b) Proposed combination of metal electrodes made of chromium or gold, a layer of GOx biomolecular assembly, and SWCNT channel in the form of FET.
Figure 2- characteristics of the SWCNT FET based on the proposed model for various gate voltages.
Figure 3Comparison of the -simulation output and the experimental data [[24]]. PBS concentration FPBS = 1 mg/mL, VGS(without PBS) = 1.5, and VPBS = 0.6 V.
Figure 4-comparison of the simulated output and measured data [[24]] for various glucose concentrations.F = 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 20, and 50 mM. The other parameters used in the simulation data are VGS(without PBS) = 1.5 V and VPBS = 0.6 V.
Average RMS errors (absolute and normalized) in drain current comparison to the simulated and measured data for various glucose concentration
| 0 (with PBS) | 19.24 | 5.66 |
| 2 | 57.55 | 12.22 |
| 4 | 49.05 | 9.75 |
| 6 | 59.47 | 11.23 |
| 8 | 53.99 | 9.80 |
| 10 | 55.60 | 9.53 |
| 20 | 69.18 | 11.17 |
| 50 | 75.07 | 11.60 |