BACKGROUND: Mindfulness has been identified as a promising strategy for managing cravings for alcohol and other drugs, but little controlled experimental research has directly studied whether this approach is effective. The current study systematically examined the effects of an acute mindfulness manipulation on craving for alcohol during prolonged exposure to alcohol cues. METHODS: Heavy drinkers (N = 84, 50% male) underwent a prolonged alcohol cue exposure paradigm in a simulated bar environment and received either a mindfulness-based strategy, a distraction (DST)-based strategy (active control), or no strategy (passive control) to cope with alcohol cravings and discomfort associated with craving. RESULTS: No baseline differences were present between conditions. Manipulation checks revealed that participants in the 2 active conditions reported using the recommended strategies. Across groups, the initial exposure to alcohol cues was associated with significant increases in craving, urge distress, and heart rate. Mixed analyses of variance on these indices following the experimental manipulation revealed significant differences based on condition over the course of the bar laboratory protocol. The DST strategy was significantly more effective at acutely reducing craving and urge distress than the other 2 conditions, which did not significantly differ from each other. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our prediction, these findings suggest that an acute DSTstrategy is beneficial for coping with alcohol cravings. The potential importance of protracted mindfulness training to detect significant effects on in vivo craving, additional implications, and methodological considerations are discussed.
BACKGROUND: Mindfulness has been identified as a promising strategy for managing cravings for alcohol and other drugs, but little controlled experimental research has directly studied whether this approach is effective. The current study systematically examined the effects of an acute mindfulness manipulation on craving for alcohol during prolonged exposure to alcohol cues. METHODS: Heavy drinkers (N = 84, 50% male) underwent a prolonged alcohol cue exposure paradigm in a simulated bar environment and received either a mindfulness-based strategy, a distraction (DST)-based strategy (active control), or no strategy (passive control) to cope with alcohol cravings and discomfort associated with craving. RESULTS: No baseline differences were present between conditions. Manipulation checks revealed that participants in the 2 active conditions reported using the recommended strategies. Across groups, the initial exposure to alcohol cues was associated with significant increases in craving, urge distress, and heart rate. Mixed analyses of variance on these indices following the experimental manipulation revealed significant differences based on condition over the course of the bar laboratory protocol. The DST strategy was significantly more effective at acutely reducing craving and urge distress than the other 2 conditions, which did not significantly differ from each other. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our prediction, these findings suggest that an acute DSTstrategy is beneficial for coping with alcohol cravings. The potential importance of protracted mindfulness training to detect significant effects on in vivo craving, additional implications, and methodological considerations are discussed.
Authors: Aleksandra Zgierska; David Rabago; Megan Zuelsdorff; Christopher Coe; Michael Miller; Michael Fleming Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 3.702
Authors: Sarah Bowen; Neharika Chawla; Susan E Collins; Katie Witkiewitz; Sharon Hsu; Joel Grow; Seema Clifasefi; Michelle Garner; Anne Douglass; Mary E Larimer; Alan Marlatt Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2009 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 3.716
Authors: Kimber Paschall Richter; Robert M McCool; Kolawole S Okuyemi; Matthew S Mayo; Jasjit S Ahluwalia Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2002 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Samuel J DeWitt; Ariel Ketcherside; Tim M McQueeny; Joseph P Dunlop; Francesca M Filbey Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2015 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: Matthew C Enkema; Kevin A Hallgren; Elizabeth C Neilson; Sarah Bowen; Elizabeth R Bird; Mary E Larimer Journal: Psychol Addict Behav Date: 2020-03-05
Authors: Simon B Goldberg; Brian Pace; Matas Griskaitis; Reinhard Willutzki; Nicole Skoetz; Sven Thoenes; Aleksandra E Zgierska; Susanne Rösner Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-10-20