Literature DB >> 24428735

Vertical profile measurements of soil air suggest immobilization of gaseous elemental mercury in mineral soil.

Daniel Obrist1, Ashok K Pokharel, Christopher Moore.   

Abstract

Evasion of gaseous elemental Hg (Hg(0)g) from soil surfaces is an important source of atmospheric Hg, but the volatility and solid-gas phase partitioning of Hg(0) within soils is poorly understood. We developed a novel system to continuously measure Hg(0)g concentrations in soil pores at multiple depths and locations, and present a total of 297 days of measurements spanning 14 months in two forests in the Sierra Nevada mountains, California, U.S. Temporal patterns showed consistent pore Hg(0)g concentrations below levels measured in the atmosphere (termed Hg(0)g immobilization), ranging from 66 to 94% below atmospheric concentrations throughout multiple seasons. The lowest pore Hg(0)g concentrations were observed in the deepest soil layers (40 cm), but significant immobilization was already present in the top 7 cm. In the absence of sinks or sources, pore Hg(0)g levels would be in equilibrium with atmospheric concentrations due to the porous nature of the soil matrix and gas diffusion. Therefore, we explain decreases in pore Hg(0)g in mineral soils below atmospheric concentrations--or below levels found in upper soils as observed in previous studies--with the presence of an Hg(0)g sink in mineral soils possibly related to Hg(0)g oxidation or other processes such as sorption or dissolution in soil water. Surface chamber measurements showing daytime Hg(0)g emissions and nighttime Hg(0)g deposition indicate that near-surface layers likely dominate net atmospheric Hg(0)g exchange resulting in typical diurnal cycles due to photochemcial reduction at the surface and possibly Hg(0)g evasion from litter layers. In contrast, mineral soils seem to be decoupled from this surface exchange, showing consistent Hg(0)g uptake and downward redistribution--although our calculations indicate these fluxes to be minor compared to other mass fluxes. A major implication is that once Hg is incorporated into mineral soils, it may be unlikely subjected to renewed Hg(0)g re-emission from undisturbed, background soils emphasizing the important role of soils in sequestering past and current Hg pollution loads.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24428735     DOI: 10.1021/es4048297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  Tundra uptake of atmospheric elemental mercury drives Arctic mercury pollution.

Authors:  Daniel Obrist; Yannick Agnan; Martin Jiskra; Christine L Olson; Dominique P Colegrove; Jacques Hueber; Christopher W Moore; Jeroen E Sonke; Detlev Helmig
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Organic horizon and mineral soil mercury along three clear-cut forest chronosequences across the northeastern USA.

Authors:  Justin B Richardson; Chelsea L Petrenko; Andrew J Friedland
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-08       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Nucleation of mercury sulfide by dealkylation.

Authors:  Mironel Enescu; Kathryn L Nagy; Alain Manceau
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  A review of global environmental mercury processes in response to human and natural perturbations: Changes of emissions, climate, and land use.

Authors:  Daniel Obrist; Jane L Kirk; Lei Zhang; Elsie M Sunderland; Martin Jiskra; Noelle E Selin
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  Mercury evasion from a boreal peatland shortens the timeline for recovery from legacy pollution.

Authors:  Stefan Osterwalder; Kevin Bishop; Christine Alewell; Johannes Fritsche; Hjalmar Laudon; Staffan Åkerblom; Mats B Nilsson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Previously unaccounted atmospheric mercury deposition in a midlatitude deciduous forest.

Authors:  Daniel Obrist; Eric M Roy; Jamie L Harrison; Charlotte F Kwong; J William Munger; Hans Moosmüller; Christ D Romero; Shiwei Sun; Jun Zhou; Róisín Commane
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.