Literature DB >> 24428586

Positioning-related complications of minimally invasive radical prostatectomies.

Timothy Wen1, Christopher M Deibert, Frank S Siringo, Benjamin A Spencer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Because of recent advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become the primary treatment option in prostate cancer. RARP, however, necessitates patients to be placed in a steep Trendelenberg position, which presents multiple opportunities for complications relating to the positioning of the patient. Our study aims to study the prevalence and demographic predictors of these positioning complications and assess their impacts on length of stay (LOS) and total cost. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included patients who underwent RP from 2008 to 2009 using data extracted from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Positioning complications (eye, nerve, compartment syndrome/rhabdomyolysis) were identified using patient-level diagnosis and procedural International Classification of Disease, 9th edition, Clinical Modification codes. Logistic regression models assessed relationships between demographic factors and occurrence of complications and the effects of them on prolonged LOS and total inpatient cost.
RESULTS: Positioning complications occurred in 0.4% of cases with eye complications contributing the most to this frequency. Laparoscopic RP procedure (odds ratio [OR]=2.88, P<0.01) and comorbidities (OR=2.34, P<0.01) were highly associated with increased odds of positioning complication occurrence, whereas RARP procedures (OR=0.93, P>0.4) were not associated with positioning complications. Having positioning complications increased a patient's odds of having increased inpatient costs and extended LOS by almost 400% and 300%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The steep Trendelenberg position used in RARP was not shown to be associated with patient positioning-related complications in this sample. The occurrence of positioning-related complications, however, places huge burdens on total inpatient costs and LOS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24428586     DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Specific complications of minimally invasive surgery].

Authors:  N Runkel; O Jurcovan
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Prostatic surgery associated acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Elerson Carlos Costalonga; Verônica Torres Costa E Silva; Renato Caires; James Hung; Luis Yu; Emmanuel A Burdmann
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2014-11-06

Review 3.  The Impact of Steep Trendelenburg Position on Intraocular Pressure.

Authors:  Matteo Ripa; Chiara Schipa; Nikolaos Kopsacheilis; Mikes Nomikarios; Gerardo Perrotta; Carlo De Rosa; Paola Aceto; Liliana Sollazzi; Pasquale De Rosa; Lorenzo Motta
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Postoperative pain and neuromuscular complications associated with patient positioning after robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective non-placebo and non-randomized study.

Authors:  Elif Gezginci; Orkunt Ozkaptan; Serdar Yalcin; Yigit Akin; Jens Rassweiler; Ali Serdar Gozen
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Incidence of "never events" among weekend admissions versus weekday admissions to US hospitals: national analysis.

Authors:  Frank J Attenello; Timothy Wen; Steven Y Cen; Alvin Ng; May Kim-Tenser; Nerses Sanossian; Arun P Amar; William J Mack
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-04-15

6.  Effects of 25- and 30-degree Trendelenburg positions on intraocular pressure changes during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Masatomo Nishikawa; Hiromitsu Watanabe; Tomofumi Kurahashi
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2017-04-07

Review 7.  Patient positioning during minimally invasive surgery: what is current best practice?

Authors:  Jacqueline M Zillioux; Tracey L Krupski
Journal:  Robot Surg       Date:  2017-07-14

8.  Neuropathic painful complications due to endopelvic nerve lesions after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: Three case reports.

Authors:  Marco Cascella; Giuseppe Quarto; Giovanni Grimaldi; Alessandro Izzo; Raffaele Muscariello; Luigi Castaldo; Barbara Di Caprio; Sabrina Bimonte; Paola Del Prete; Arturo Cuomo; Sisto Perdonà
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Trends in Positioning for Robotic Prostatectomy: Results From a Survey of the Endourological Society.

Authors:  George Wayne; Jeff Wei; Elias Atri; Vivian Wong; Maurilio Garcia-Gil; Jorge Pereira; Alan M Nieder; Akshay Bhandari
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-01-11

10.  Comparison of Acute Kidney Injury After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Versus Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Eun-Young Joo; Yeon-Jin Moon; Syn-Hae Yoon; Ji-Hyun Chin; Jai-Hyun Hwang; Young-Kug Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.889

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.